Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Common mate you know ,you guys should be the last to teach honor to indians.There is no such thing as honor in the vocabulary of Indians.
The infamous Indian proverb: Bagal Mein Churi, Muh Mein Ram
Are we not in the worst sanction a country caould ever experience since Trump era?at best would impose economic sanctions on China
May Pakistan have such game changers on every visit.Imran khan Moscow visit was a game changer, india now has no other option other then getting 100 lashes or eating 100 onions
You just burst the bubble of fantasy Pakistani kids here on this forum.
I think this is why Pakistan's foreign policy sucks as their establishment think same as these chhote jungi momins here on PDF.
Of course, India can have some negative consequences of this action. But the positive thing for India is, it can afford the after effects.
But I don't think, it's very easy for the US and the west to punish India.
US is much needed of India to exists in Asia.
And after 2 years, i think everyone is gonna forget and start the same thing as it was before the Ukraine crisis. Interests matters.
India is like "gale ki faans' for the west. Naa khaaye jaaye, na bahar nikaala jaaye!
Dude seriously why would need India for Pakistan, all they need is a couple of dollars to make a phone call.Delusional Indian hindu rat, allow me to educate you.
American led group of nations chose India to be nuisance for Pakistan and China, a role of their regional pet dog, which you gladly accepted. But when push came to shove, got b!tch slapped by Pakistan, and China, well, it just clubbed you to death and conquered 1200 sq kms of your claimed territory without firing a single bullet. In nutshell, geopolitically India value is now close to zero. You are not capable for the task that your western masters assigned you. Now when your masters ask you to atleast support them with numbers in UN, all it took was a phone call from Putin to Modi. LOL.
Being a cheap labour source, is what your worth is now.
non Aligned my foot.This conflict really has been the toughest test of India's non aligned foreign policy.
Dude seriously why would need India for Pakistan, all they need is a couple of dollars to make a phone call.
USSR and Russia's past veto in favour of India
In the early years, USSR used to use the veto power frequently, so much so that as per reports, the then Soviet ambassador Andrei Gromyko earned the nickname Mr Nyet and Vyacheslav Molotov was known as Mr Veto. Over the years, the USSR/Russia has cast a total of 146 vetoes, or close to half of all vetoes. Since 1946, when the USSR used the veto power on a draft resolution regarding the withdrawal of foreign troops from Lebanon and Syria, the veto has been recorded 294 times.
Over the years, USSR/Russia has used the veto power in favour of India as well. In all, the permanent member of the UNSC has used the veto power four times in support of India.
1957
The USSR first used the veto power for India in 1957 over the Kashmir issue. When Nikita Khrushchev, the then leader of the Soviet Union, visited India in 1955, he said that Moscow was just 'across the border' and in case of any trouble in Kashmir, Delhi should just give a shout to the USSR. He stayed true to his words, and when Pakistan proposed the use of a temporary UN force in connection the demilitarisation and the bilateral issue was close to becoming an international issue, USSR used the veto power in favour of India.
1961
In 1961, Portugal sent a letter to the UNSC concerning Goa. At that time, Goa was still under the power of Portugal and India was trying to liberate the region and make it a part of our nation. Unlike France, Portugal refused to let go of its territories in India and even opened fire on the protesters in Goa.
As per reports, Nikita Khrushchev sent a telegram to former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in which he said India's actions "to do away with outposts of colonialism in its territory were absolutely lawful and justified".
Portugal tried to invoke the UN Charter and proposed a resolution that India should withdraw their forces from Goa. The proposal was supported by the United States, the United Kingdom and France. But USSR came to India's rescue and blew away the proposal by using the veto power. It strengthened India's cause, and on December 19, 1961, Goa was finally liberated from the rule of Portugal.
It is important to note that it was USSR's 99th veto.
1962
USSR used its 100th veto in 1962, and this time again, in favour of India. An Irish Resolution in the UNSC urged India and Pakistan to directly negotiate with one another to settle the Kashmir issue. Seven UNSC members supported it, and among them were four permanent members - the US, France, UK and China. The Indian delegation refused to accept the resolution and then, the Russian delegate Platon Dmitrievich Morozov used the veto power to make the resolution null and void.
1971
In 1965, after the India-Pakistan War began, the then Pakistani foreign minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto raised the Kashmir issue at the UN, and the Indian delegation walked out in protest. According to reports, Kunwar Natwar Singh, the former Minister of External Affairs termed the walkout as a 'turning point' for the UN regarding the Kashmir issue. The Kashmir issue became dormant in the UNSC except in 1971 when resolutions were proposed over the Kashmir issue, but in December 1971, when India was engaged in a war against Pakistan to liberate Bangladesh, the USSR used its veto power thrice to ensure that the issue remains a bilateral one instead of becoming a global concern that could attract interference from third-party nations.
Veto power: What is it and how many times Russia has used it in favour of India
If a permanent member does not fully agree with a proposed resolution but does not wish to cast a veto, it may choose to abstain, thus allowing the resolution to be adopted if it obtains the required number of nine favourable votes.www.google.com
I don’t get it. Either India is a US lapdog or we’re a Russian lapdog. Make up your minds.
I don’t like realpolitik beyond a certain limit. I had hoped we would stand with Ukraine in some shape or form. But I understand why this is the course of action we chose. It is in our interest.
Oh boy you seriously believe Imran Russian visit was a success.How did any of the stuff you mentioned stopped PMIK meeting Putin bang in the middle when Russia invaded Ukraine?
India is America regional pet dog. Has been spreading terrorism in Pakistan right under American nose with yanks looking the other way. We all understand this without any ambiguity.
What you have done in UNSC is showing your lack of spine and pissed off your main sponsors, anyone who think that its Indian sovereign independent decision is living in cuckooland. It's the result of Putin call to Modi. India is sh!t scared that in midest of Pakistan and China breathing down its neck, having angry Russia on top of that might be last nail in the coffin.
As to what will be the consequences of ditching a Zionist Zalinsky , well , you should be clever enough and let your mind run wild.
Oh boy you seriously believe Imran Russian visit was a success.
The dust still has to settle to see what tangible benefits will come. The Russians will switch to the yuan based swift alternative which Pakistan will have no problems accessing. Time will tell if any trade benefits emerge.Oh boy you seriously believe Imran Russian visit was a success.