What's new

In Rotterdam, posters of Jewish man and Muslim woman kissing spark a scandal

anyway back on topic this is what usually happens when jewish men meet muslim women


video_image_5161412688c93.jpg
 
. . . . .
Welcome to the Caliphate, in the heart of Europe. Europeans have no one to blame but themselves.
 
. . . .
Seems like message is dont have muslim children very Devilish mind
as typically folks who are in mixed relations don't really have a cultural or religious identity

Not completely unexpected from Europeans, they have a higher moral ground on all matters

Their morality just sinks once immigrants start to show up on boats to their borders
But quite a twisted poster campaign against Muslims

Personally I don't worry about such matter but I really don't expect a advertisement campaign running around promoting who should be dating or having relation with who

Becasue , you don't normally see a campaign forexample showing a man from Africa kissing a white european women and then the advertisement goes, well this is to promote some cause that have more babies with African immigrant person

Again let me rephrase nothing wrong with someone marrying their own choice but please don't run advertisement which are fiarly one sided which have political agenda when people marry or settle down it is a private choice

Lets discuss Hypocrassy

Normally in western Media /News outlets it is quite common to see themes of white man , with white women in advertisement and black women with black man. Not sure why all of sudden they had an impulse to worry about who Muslims should be marrying. I don't recall a movie with Asian guy with white girl either rare


Really when was last time you saw Harrison Ford with Black actress kissing on movie?
Or When Will Smith was in some movies why was he always paired with Black Actress.
Or Tom Cruise mostly comes in movies with white girls


May be Europeans should worry about ROMA people why don't they give them citizenship cards ? or Why don't they kiss them more often ? They are living in your society for quite sometime

Hey Holland if you listening Immigrants coming your way
a04_16975333.jpg


And please you don't need to wear a facemask , they are human beings as well

Some serious double standard when you really dig some shit on how ROMA people are kicked out city to city or country to country
ff4df5f6d1229cece56c06dc30e88fda.jpg


I don't know may be do a poster ROMA guys with European women kissing

I find ROMA people and folks from Africa to be very unique and beautiful in their own way

article-2194704-14B7F155000005DC-662_634x422.jpg


These kind of forced eviction are part of present age European culture don't give the folks citizenship or equal rights and then send in police to abuse them kicking people out region to region

How about you do a poster , where the Immigrant is kissing a Police women from Europe ?:smitten:Perhaps it is not twisted enough for European liking
 
Last edited:
.
The earth belongs to no nation, borders are on maps alone. Once you have citizenship you own that country as much as any other mongrol.
Its not against the law in NL...Is it. So as a NL citizen, everyone follows the law of the land....NL does not object to Muslim/Jew kissing...so whats the problem here!
 
.
The earth belongs to no nation, borders are on maps alone. Once you have citizenship you own that country as much as any other mongrol.


That is only the opinion of rootless subjects like you. You have no home, no roots, no cultue. No past and no future.
 
.
That is only the opinion of rootless subjects like you. You have no home, no roots, no cultue. No past and no future.

We have roots, we also have ambition. We don't fear laying new roots. Our message will take hold this way.
 
.
We have roots, we also have ambition. We don't fear laying new roots. Our message will take hold this way.


You have nothing. And your ambitions are as worthless as the ambitions we enslaved before.

Those who tried to find a new future in Italy too had "ambitions". And are hold like slaves now and work without payments 10hours a day / 7 days per week on the fields until they are worn off and cast aside.

Its important that weed doesnt grow too much roots amigo. And there is nothing better than crushing hope and ambitions of unwanted subjects.
 
.
thetimesofisrael-529x60.png

In Rotterdam, posters of Jewish man and Muslim woman kissing spark a scandal
Netherlands campaign encouraging free choice of romantic partners triggers fierce backlash, vandalism, threats

BY CNAAN LIPHSHIZ July 21, 2017, 2:27 am

Cnaan Liphshiz

AMSTERDAM (JTA) — In a country where sex toys are displayed in shop windows and television commercials often feature nudity, a picture of a clothed, heterosexual couple kissing may not seem like the stuff of scandal.

But precisely such an image — part of a poster campaign celebrating diversity in the Netherlands — has triggered acrimonious debate, charges of racism, acts of vandalism and even threats by those who found it offensive.
The reason: The women pictured in a series of posters were wearing Muslim headscarves – including one woman who was shown kissing a man wearing a kippah.

To some of the detractors, the poster campaign was a provocation designed to upset the sensibilities of Dutch Muslims and other non-white minorities. But to campaign supporters — including some prominent members of the Dutch Jewish community — it was an important statement about the need to counter radicalism and coercion in the Netherlands’ growing Muslim minority.

Initiated by a Muslim activist for women’s rights, Shirin Musa, the posters are part of a municipal initiative in support of women, mostly Muslim, who face abuse if they choose spouses their communities disapprove of. Bearing the slogan “In the Netherlands, you choose your own partner,” the posters were placed in bus stops and on signposts across Rotterdam. Supporters of the initiative also handed out fliers with the images on the streets.

The campaign features four couples locking lips against a background featuring the port city’s iconic Erasmus Bridge: the Jewish-Muslim couple; a Muslim woman kissing a blond man; two women, one in a South Asian dress, and a black man with a woman who appears to be of South Asian descent. (Leefbaar Rotterdam, the rightist faction that led the municipally sponsored campaign, did not immediately answer JTA’s query as to whether the people in the posters were real-life couples or actors posing as lovers.)



Shirin Musa handing out fliers in Rotterdam featuring images from the poster campaign on free choice of partners, May 25, 2017. (Courtesy of Femme for Freedom)

The campaign is in support of “women with an immigrant background from patriarchal communities,” Musa said in an interview on Dutch television last month. Such women, she said, are subjected to violence and coercion over their choice of romantic partners.

Citing a 2014 study by the Verwey Jonker Institue, a social policy research group, Dutch officials say there are between 600 and 1,900 victims of forced marriage in the Netherlands. The report also describes wives who are held captive or abandoned.

Virtually all of the major media in the Netherlands have reported on the controversy around the poster campaign. On the prime-time talk show “Pauw,” the head of the Dutch Labour Party, Lodweijk Asscher, praised the campaign as “beautiful.”

But the posters triggered a backlash among some Muslims, including within Asscher’s own party. One of Labour’s representatives on the Rotterdam City Council, Fatima Talbi, wrote in an op-ed that she was “furious” about the campaign, which she said treats Muslims as though they are “backward” by turning the matter of forced marriage into “an integration issue.”

Tunahan Kuzu, a lawmaker in the Dutch parliament for the radical pro-Islam, pro-immigration party Denk, which in the March elections won three seats in the parliament’s lower house, called the campaign “provocative, discriminating and patronizing.” Several of the posters were vandalized, hateful rhetoric was directed at their supporters on social media and activists distributing campaign fliers reported threats of violence. Police assigned officers to watch over some of the activists following several incidents.

One man told an activist from Musa’s Femme for Freedom organization: “I’m going to thump you on your f***ing head if you give me this flier,” Tanya Hoogwerf, a Rotterdam councilwoman, told the PowNed television channel last month.

Two men filmed themselves destroying a poster that was placed on a bus shelter.

“Choose your own freedom, they say,” one of the men said. “Rip it all the way out.”

Musa Movi, a well-known Muslim comedian, in a video called the campaign’s initiators “mosquitoes that you don’t see coming, but when they get you – it’s over.” He then slapped his own neck as one does when killing a mosquito.

The poster featuring the man wearing a kippah was the image that “drew the most attention and criticism” by Muslims, according to Ronny Naftaniel, the executive vice chairman of the Brussels-based CEJI group, a Jewish organization that promotes tolerance in Europe, and a former director of the CIDI Dutch Jewish watchdog on anti-Semitism.

On Maroc.nl, a news site and forum popular with many Dutch Muslims, a moderator called the campaign the work of “racists and feminists who … provoke Muslims during Ramadan with posters of a Jew kissing a Muslim woman.”

But, Naftaniel added, Muslim detractors were more likely to focus on the depiction of Muslim women and less on the man wearing a kippah.

“The criticism by Muslims was that the campaign tries to enforce social norms on the Muslim minority,” Naftaniel said. “And I think we can debate this issue: Is the campaign saying that it’s good if people lose their identity, intermarry into one big mishmash?”

Although the campaign provoked no negative reactions in Jewish public circles, Naftaniel said, “many Dutch Jews would not like to see their child marry a Muslim, though they don’t feel the need to say it.”

Despite his doubts about how the campaign can be interpreted, Naftaniel ultimately supports its message promoting freedom in choosing romantic partners.

“You can choose someone from a different ethnicity to yours. But you don’t have to. And I think the campaign could have been clearer about this distinction,” he said.

To Esther Voet, the editor-in-chief of the Dutch Jewish Nieuw Israelietisch Weekblad weekly, the “intensity of opposition that this campaign generated is the best proof of how necessary it is.”

It showed that in the Netherlands today, “for many Muslims, seeing a member of their own community kissing a Jew is an image that crosses a line, and that creates resistance,” she told JTA. “And that sentiment is precisely at the heart of the reason that this campaign was started in the first place.”
this is actually very lovely but unrealistic since such happening might be objected by both communities regardless of whatever the gender is of the couple.
on the face of it, the picture is very inspiring and promotes piece and hands down wins over pictures of gun totting men or women with blowhard phrases against each other.

Deviant lady.
what if it was a Jewish lady and Muslim man?
ok then? if so then why? lets not be gender specific and hypocrite
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom