Because talibans rule was imposed on people against their will ..simple fact.. Few Jihadi molvi can come to Islambad hijacked it and would declare themselves calipha then would you accept state within state ?
Saudia arabia has kinship and dictatorship which is also against Islamci principles but still Saudia is well organised ahd have legal due process unlike talibans
So you can that religious Iran regime was imposed on their people?
Or Saudi Kingdom is imposed on their people.
We read too much of a western accounts that paints such a bleak picture, to justify their occupation.
The same was said for Iraq and Syria?
Taliban may have opposition, yes.
But they have double the support.
Isn't democracy meant majority is authority?
My only point is, if afghan taliban government is rich, they would have some setup like Iran or Saudi Arabia. Better managing their country.
But they are poor, uneducated and in short they stayed barbarians.
If they are rich Kingdom, all their faults were happily hushed up.
Pakistani society is different, it is used to be very Liberal society, though Liberal is an abuse for the masses. Zia destroyed it, but still the society is becoming tolerant day by day.we have proper system of governance in place. Such large and powerful army that we are not in danger of any invasion. And no such invasion can happen without the support or people. And Pakistani society about majority rejects them. They even don't vote religious parties.
In Afghanistan situation is opposite. In kabul you may hear different views and in coutryside very different.
