Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
so what you are proposing is essentially the elimination of caste based positive discrimination?
so answer me sir, who should be helped ? ---
a kid (scored 60%) - whose illiterate father is a sweeper and barely feeds his family
- who helps his family in earning daily bread
- cant afford to buy books.
or a kid (scored 70%) - who belongs to a family owning huge family fortunes
Always the 70% has to be given priority over a 60% scorer at every education entrance system.*
With free market there is enough supply so it really doesn't matter what you score since there will be education supply to give to you anyway to gain a decent livelihood.
For example one system can be:
So 90% - 100% is needed for top tier university
75% - 90% needed for regular college/university
50 - 75% vocational education top tier
under 50% vocational education regular
Loan arrangements can be made for each to help financing.
Everyone also given access to a basic loan on completing high school that one can use for startup purposes or injection into a family business etc if they do not want to go for further studies. This loan has to be provided by the private sector however so it meets the efficiency/solvency criteria....but more banking deregulation will help the supply of this as well.
So some system like this if ideal imo, the precise barriers will be determined by the market and companies (job providers) should have a strong influence in determining where the exact boundaries should lie (and local market effects should be allowed to operate as well at say district level or even higher resolution).
But the overall main important thing is that demand for tertiary and vocational education is met and even surpassed (by provision of simple supply-side subsidy if needed). The govt has no involvement in the running of educational institutes....only in the creation and monitoring of standards. This will save money to the taxpayer and also promote better quality education given privately run institutes have to compete with each other for students and thus have to be efficient to survive, expand and prosper like any other business.
Right now the main problem is the involvement of the govt has created a really nasty bottleneck in the supply because of govt ineptness in running any business compared to the private sector. If the supply is allowed to mushroom, thats most of the problem solved right there.....as it means your 60% kid with the tough background and upbringing does not hit a dead end and nor does he need to be nurtured by essentially govt theft, inefficiency and divisive vote-banking.
*A Score need not be 100% based on final marks either. It can be a composition of final tests, extra curricular performance, athletics, proof of improvement coefficients and a host of other scores that can form a weighted composite final score that will be a more well rounded measure of merit of a student. There can even be different scores with different weights so that one can gleam where the best fit for a student is quite quickly in future programs and institutes. The important thing however is that such a system is applied EQUALLY across all students.
Last edited: