and whats the possible solution to this, according to you?
also, i find "reservation on the basis of financial status" cannot be implemented in a socially fractured place as india. remember, our solution needs to simple. it cant have 'n' no. of ends which can be bent and exploited.
the way i see it, financial reservation will not only increase "anti-meritocracy" and rampant corruption (its still there, but the magnitude will increase manifold as number of ppl encompassed will be much more than the no. of SC/STs today), it will be the 8itch of whoever can afford money to make themselves a shining new "BPL" certificate.
now, the above anomalies can be countered if the state machinery does its job properly. but then, this will solve the present situation as well.
i believe our founding fathers, esp ambedkar, foresaw it and modelled as you have said "1-1 narrative".
the only viable solution i see is - stop the eligibles (SC/STs) from availing the "help" if their father/mother (previous generation) had already availed the same. this way, the deserving ones get the "help" and the greedy ones are kept out, thereby, eliminating the quota system as time progresses (will take hell lot of a time though, considering rampant illiteracy and misinformation in interior parts).
however, i am at loss to find a viable (in this case, non exploitable) solution for the ppl who belong to castes others than SC/STs.
Over to you.
this is very true. i happened to see an (incomplete) interview in NDTV, in which Mira Kumar (LS Speaker) mentioned this same anomaly.
i ll try to post that interview .
Decades ago SC/ST got reservation as per their percentage... now the population grown, they have the competition within themselves... Economic conditions is not only parameter for the reservation but the Social identity... even upper higher class from Dalits are being discriminated...
An example :
On this day, twenty two years ago, the remote village of Tsunduru in Tenali revenue division was witness to a brutal massacre of Dalits in a carnage unleashed by socially-dominant communities.
On Tuesday, families residing in the village converged at ‘Raktha Sketharam’, the place where the bodies of Dalits were buried, and offered their homage to the departed souls. A meeting was held in which Dalit Bahujan Front convener Korivi Vinaya Kumar and others spoke.
But years after the incident, Dalit associations say justice is still eluding them. An appeal seeking life imprisonment to 35 persons who were convicted and awarded simple imprisonment by Special Court Judge Anis in the year 2007 is still pending in the High Court. The special court awarded life imprisonment to 21 persons. The State government had not appointed a successor to special public prosecutor B. Chandrasekhar, who died in January this year.
Jaladi Wilson, convener of Tsunduru Dalit Victims’ Association, told The Hindu they had requested the government to appoint Bojja Tarakam as Special Public Prosecutor to present the case. Back on August 6, 1991, the savage attack on Dalits left eight persons dead but had many more wounded. In a planned attack, the Dalits fleeing for safety were lynched, their bodies pierced into pieces, stuffed into gunny bags and thrown in the Tungabhadra drain. One more youth, Anil Kumar, was killed in police firing in the village. The gory incident galvanised the Dalits into launching a nationwide crusade seeking social justice and emancipation of Dalits. Dalits in towns and villages poured on the streets protesting the massacre. The State government doled out welfare schemes in a bid to contain the anger but was forced to act firmly against the perpetrators of the most heinous attack on Dalits in India’s modern history. Police filed charge-sheets against 219 people belonging to Tsunduru and neighbouring villages.
Under pressure from Dalit associations, the State government established a special court under the provisions of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Tsunduru to try the accused. On a tense day on August 1, 2007, special court judge Anis convicted 56 accused, out of which 21 were awarded life imprisonment and 35 simple imprisonments. It let off 115 others citing lack of evidence.
Everyone saying atrocity act are being misused, but the fact majority or incident are not reported... that is due to political influence or by threatening them...