Ajaxpaul
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 4,412
- Reaction score
- -5
I merely reply to your post #124, you think that one is on topic?
Haha..The topic was india china and Bhutan. It was you who bought pakistan and CPEC into it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I merely reply to your post #124, you think that one is on topic?
Pakistani soldiers are brave.Pakistan and India posses weapons of similar strength. The difference is Pakistan does not have the landmass or strategic depth India has, so hence it has produced more weapons. But yes the same argument does apply.
Yes it didn't go well, but that was years ago, the Chinese still went in and captured territory and occupied regions to force the main Vietnamese army to fight, which didn't and had to be held back to defend the capital. They used mostly guerrilla attacks which were effective and China left. Not because it was forced out but due to a lack of forward thinking.
Well, if Pakistan and China want, this 0.5 front can become 5.0 and that will be more than their army chief ever thought of in his wildest dreams.Lol even with Maoist and ULFA, Indian government are running and panicking like an headless chicken...the 0.5 front will keep India busy for long long time.
I wonder that when China could Not fight in the 1987 stand off
when India's economy was Nothing ; what can it do now
And that time too India was facing a Two Front situation
With Operation BrassStacks against Pakistan and operation Falcon
against China at the SAME time in 1987
Well, if Pakistan and China want, this 0.5 front can become 5.0 and that will be more than their army chief ever thought of in his wildest dreams.
wake me up.. wen we have a war
Neither do you champ...You probably are mentioning Sunny LeoneDude, you have no idea who Sunny Deol is, she has natural assets
Why did you not include sri lanka in this gang, They must be feeling left out!Theoretically, both sides have chance, however, China has nothing to lose, India can't take the risk of lose, four tigers are staring at India, China, Pakistan, BD and Mynamar, if India lose a major war, Punjab and Kashmir will go to Pakistan, West Bangli and part of NE will go to BD, Myanmar will also get part of NE (Yes, Myanmar! I know you can't believe it). The simple issue here is, the chicken neck will not last very long in history, it's completely counter-intuitive. That's why India always feel insecure and have a strong desire to expand to protect their chicken neck. Most important, lose a war is probably the start of disintegration of India union, Indian union is only slightly solid than EU.
U again ... errr ... lets stay conventional. in the end ,wat will stop 1.3 billion marching towards a megre 200 million... dont worry we will always have border wars.. china is different more than 2 billion ppl will be directly affected..... Dream on there will no war.. let alone both shld start with fencing first if they can.. nothing will win the Himalayas.How long can you be asleep? You'll have to wake up anyway since there isn't going to be any war.
Indian policymakers don't have the balls to commit such blunder even in their wildest dreams. The fact is India's ability to win a conventional war from Pakistan comes with a question mark. Add China to that equation and India simply disintegrates into several countries.
Pakistan can never overtly do anything about India-China offensive stances...the best that they can do is to heat up the loc.With Bhutan affair, China and Pakistan can get closer for common cause, we will support Pakistan over J&K as India to Bhutan, and Pakistan can do us some favor too over South Tibet...so don't rule out that we will sit idle in the future.
yea , on PDF 100 % china will win, BTW do wear panties while cheerleading , bye for now 62
India doesn't have the 1.3 billion on their side, the Sanghi Policies have ensured that. India in the Kargil war, which is just one peak in the Himalayas, had to run to USA for help to end the takeover. Now that the Pakistani reliance on USA have changed a bit and the hatred of Himalayan People towards India has gone up manifolds, the outcome would be totally different.U again ... errr ... lets stay conventional. in the end ,wat will stop 1.3 billion marching towards a megre 200 million... dont worry we will always have border wars.. china is different more than 2 billion ppl will be directly affected..... Dream on there will no war.. let alone both shld start with fencing first if they can.. nothing will win the Himalayas.
By multiplying it with 10.how to turn .5 to 5? can you explain
Perspective .. if my mother wants me to fight, ill be there waitingIndia doesn't have the 1.3 billion on their side, the Sanghi Policies have ensured that. India in the Kargil war, which is just one peak in the Himalayas, had to run to USA for help to end the takeover. Now that the Pakistani reliance on USA have changed a bit and the hatred of Himalayan People towards India has gone up manifolds, the outcome would be totally different.