What's new

IAF deploys Sukhoi fighters in Punjab

.
I think its too close to pakistan and to put our best asset in the striking distance is not a good idea.
in the past war PAF have attack HAlwara airbase and they destroyed lots of Plane in the hanger ,so i think we should put su-30 MKI in central india .
 
.
I think its too close to pakistan and to put our best asset in the striking distance is not a good idea.
in the past war PAF have attack HAlwara airbase and they destroyed lots of Plane in the hanger ,so i think we should put su-30 MKI in central india .

Those old days are far gone.

We are getting the best in the world and we will deploy them across India be it north, south or central.

Soon India will have best of the world, the latest and most advance fighter jets deployed all over. :devil:
 
.
Those old days are far gone.

We are getting the best in the world and we will deploy them across India be it north, south or central.

Soon India will have best of the world, the latest and most advance fighter jets deployed all over. :devil:

You are right old days are gone that's why we have to be more careful.
In Old days pakistan's only option to attack air base was Fighter aircraft now the time has change they have Babur cruise missile ,Raad and ballistic missile can be use to target our bases .
Sam or air defence battery are not that much capable to defend against these new thread.
 
. .
In our immediate neighborhood, there aren't any AESA capable fighters right now, but will be soon-
Dassault Rafale
J 10
Super Su 30 MKI
J 20
FGFA
T-50
J 21 or J 31 (whatever the name is)
Tejas Mk II
JF 17 Mk. II
AMCA
Tejas Mk.III
JF 17 Mk. III
can be more, no idea about them.........

I was asking who is the first to use AESA in our region so it means currantly even china doesnt have any fighter with AESAS rite ...
 
.
You are right old days are gone that's why we have to be more careful.
In Old days pakistan's only option to attack air base was Fighter aircraft now the time has change they have Babur cruise missile ,Raad and ballistic missile can be use to target our bases .
Sam or air defence battery are not that much capable to defend against these new thread.

Surely MKI piloted by Rajni Kaant will destroy Cruise and Ballistic missiles all together!

On a serious note, Cruise missiles have changed the geometry of future wars. No need to send Our fighters across the border when we got intelligent systems flying at less than 100 meters giving very little time to you people to react.
 
.
I was asking who is the first to use AESA in our region so it means currantly even china doesnt have any fighter with AESAS rite ...

For J-10B, the nose cone is modified to accommodate an active phased array airborne radar (AESA) radar.[25][26] The general designer of AESA for J-10B is Mr. Zhang Kunhui (张昆辉, 1963 -), the head of 607 Research Institute in Neijiang, Sichuan. Mr. Zhang Kunhui became the deputy head of 607th Research Institute in 1997, and four years later in 2001, he became the head of the institute, when the AESA program for J-10B started. The primary contractor of this AESA is the Radar and Electronic Equipment Research Academy of Aviation Industry Corporation of China located in Sichuan, formed in March 2004 by combining the 607th Research Institute and 171st Factory together with Mr. Zhang Kunhui was named as the head of the research academy. According to Chinese governmental media, the AESA for J-10B took 8 years to develop, finally completed in 2008, and Chinese fighter radars hence achieved a quantum leap in that it went from mechanically scanned planar slotted array directly into AESA, skipping the passive phased array PESA radar. Many suspected the radar is a PESA, but during its brief debuts in the 7th China International Defense Electronics Exhibition (CIDEX) in May 2010 and the 6th International Conference on Radar held in Beijing in Sept 2011, Chinese official sources have claimed it is an AESA.[27] The AESA on J-10B incorporates design features of other countries in that it has a fixed array like Israeli and American AESA for fighters, but in the same time, it also adopts the practice of directly embedding IFF dipole antenna in the main array, a design feature common to Russian and Swedish airborne radars, and embedding of IFF is what caused many to erroneously identify the radar for J-10B is PESA instead AESA. A total of 8 IFF dipoles are shown, with the typical capability of handling two targets at the same time, the AESA for J-10B would be able to track 16 targets simultaneously.

Chengdu J-10 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
International Assessment and Strategy Center > Research > China’s Maturing Fighter Force
 
.
Just wanna know from anyone.what would happen if war broke out & Pakistani F16 & Su 30 MKI are confronted head to head???

This has been discussed many times to death of the topic and no one had come to any solution in the end.
Currently, the best AMRAAM missile is Aim-120C5 which is operated by PAF. On head to head, F-16C and F-16D stand more chances than Su-30. The radar and EW suite of Block-52+ gives more stronger reasons to place your bets on it over Su-30. After the MLU process of F-16A/B Block-15, they have chances to survive too but lesser than Block-52+.

You can learn more on it over here. It's an excellent thread given that you ignore low-quality posts.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistan-air-force/160130-how-paf-should-counter-su-30-mki.html
 
.
Surely MKI piloted by Rajni Kaant will destroy Cruise and Ballistic missiles all together!

On a serious note, Cruise missiles have changed the geometry of future wars. No need to send Our fighters across the border when you have a intelligent systems flying at less than 100 meters giving very little time to you people to react.

Sunny deol is enough for you don't worry about Su 30 Mki.

imgres
 
.
Does Su30MKI have any real combat experience with any western fighter please let me know if not then it's of no use to compare with F-16 which is proven aircraft
 
.
Does Su30MKI have any real combat experience with any western fighter please let me know if not then it's of no use to compare with F-16 which is proven aircraft

Going by the same argument, the F16 has never fought a Su 30 MKI or even a Su 27 flanker for that matter. You cant really say its "combat proven" when the majority of the operations that the F16s have taken part in, was against countries with inferior or no air force.

But I remember seeing a video on youtube, where Mirage 2000s from the Hellenic air force, shot down the F16s from Turkey.

BTW I have a question: When will the Su 30 MKIs have the AESA radars?
 
. .
You nailed it mate,but trust me it's not gonna work, cause if worked on that breed then why would the world call them indians.

Actually, you are wrong. Each MKI has 10 BVR's, each of which contains 10 warheads that it can deploy. Each missile has enough fuel that it can chase a space shuttle to the moon. So 1 MKI with full load, 10 milles = 100 PAF jets. Damn, you guys over spent the money. All you needed was 4 MKI total with 40 BVR's (and 4 MKI and 40 BVR's as spares)....PAF would be done with those :). I have a feeling that the 4 spare MKI's and the 40 bvr's will never be put to use as no PAF plane would be left. The ones that might escape will default to India. India will have air supremacy with 4 MKI's over entire Pakistan.
Similarly, 10 MKI's with 100 missiles will take care of the Chinese. India will always live long and the rest of the world is doomed and bowing in front of the Indian might!!! New world order after 3013.
 
.
Thorough Pro, doesnt seem to be so thorough with his history. :P 60 years earlier you were called Indians too :P
 
.
Back
Top Bottom