I don't believe in Democracy.

[saynow]

democracy is a system
one of systems to run country by
agree or disagree but it has been proving itself as successful system
but not many understand it well

 

[Major d1]

democracy is a system
one of systems to run country by
agree or disagree but it has been proving itself as successful system
but not many understand it well

Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others. Democracy gave us nothing.
Democracy destroys itself because it abuses its right to freedom and equality. Because it teaches its citizens to consider audacity as a right, lawlessness as a freedom, abrasive speech as equality, and anarchy as progress.

• A falsified quote invented during the 2010 financial crisis. Isocrates' actual, more nuanced, quote runs as follows:
• Those who directed the state in the time of Solon and Cleisthenes did not establish a polity which … trained the citizens in such fashion that they looked upon insolence as democracy, lawlessness as liberty, impudence of speech as equality, and licence to do what they pleased as happiness, but rather a polity which detested and punished such men and by so doing made all the citizens better and wiser.

Democracy gave you what ?

 

[T-72M1]

wow, so he's actually for real.

 

[Major d1]

wow, so he's actually for real.

excuse me. didn't get ur point-

 

[T-72M1]

excuse me. didn't get ur point-

given the insane nature of your postings here, I thought you were a troll but it looks like you are for real.

what's with the really bad grammar, did you go to a madrassa instead of proper school for your education ?

 

[Major d1]

Thanks for for ur nice compliment. After all u understood my language.

 

[scorpionx]

I don't believe in democracy , and this is MY Democratic rights . Whatever- Democracy gave me nothing.

Please move to North Korea and practise your democratic rights as much as you want.

 

[T-72M1]

 

[cocomo]

I like (conceptually) Ottomon millet system. It is arguably more tolerant than secular democracies. It allows different courts for people of different faith groups, it doesn't just tolerate different faith groups but acknowledges the differences as well.

Wikipedia.
"
People were bound to their millets by their religious affiliations (or their confessional communities), rather than their ethnic origins, according to the millet concept.[3] The head of a millet – most often a religious hierarch such as the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople or, in earlier times, the Patriarch of the East – reported directly to the Ottoman Sultan or the Sassanid king, respectively. The millets had a great deal of power – they set their own laws and collected and distributed their own taxes. All that was required was loyalty to the Empire. When a member of one millet committed a crime against a member of another, the law of the injured party applied, but the ruling Islamic majority being paramount, any dispute involving a Muslim fell under their sharia−based law.
"

 

[Hellfire]

@Arsalan @Joe Shearer @nair @Spectre

You will enjoy this one though

 

[Joe Shearer]

@Arsalan @Joe Shearer @nair @Spectre

You will enjoy this one though

I hope so; I REALLY hope so. I just did a @hellfire and lost fifteen minutes worth of reply.

 

[Grevion]

What is this

 

[Khanate]

Republic means wish of the people. But Khilafah is not republic, the main reason is what khilafah will declare people have to bound to do so.

Pakistan and Iran is a republic country . But we can't say pplz of PK and iran living under khilafah state.

Again, you're creating your own definition.

A republic is simply a representative form of governance where citizens elect their representative. This what you own Khilafah model is based on, voting to elect representatives.

Pakistan and Iran are Islamic republic. You may be confusing us with Bangladesh which is a secular democracy.

@Kaptaan Dude is trolling hard. And its a clear pattern of shitposting here and here.

 

[Major d1]

Again, you're creating your own definition.

A republic is simply a representative form of governance where citizens elect their representative. This what you own Khilafah model is based on, voting to elect representatives.

Pakistan and Iran are Islamic republic. You may be confusing us with Bangladesh which is a secular democracy.

@Kaptaan Dude is trolling hard. And its a clear pattern of shitposting here and here.

But In khilafah ppl will not select khilafa. They will be under ummah council. consults will declare who will be khalifa. Yes ummah council has a option on the basis of voting system. Republic system under democracy system. Not Khilafah system. Democracy is democracy , whatever it is liberal or secular. or moderate.

 

[Khanate]

But In khilafah ppl will not select khilafa. They will be under ummah council. consults will declare who will be khalifa. Yes ummah council has a option on the basis of voting system. Republic system under democracy system. Not Khilafah system. Democracy is democracy , whatever it is liberal or secular. or moderate.

In a parliamentary system, people do not choose a Prime Minister. You're thinking of American-style Presidential system.