How many wars has Pakistan won?

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

None of our kind worship Hindus.
We are blessed to be Muslims. Thanks.

Sure you don't and Hitler was actually Jamaican. Your biological fathers must all be hindus who raped your mothers whilst your cucked men folk watched........

 

[Hamza913]

Walaikum assalam brother.

1947 - you could easily have won Kashmir if the lashkars stayed out. Reality is that Srinagar remained with India. The objective was set before the battle. You can't change it after the battle has concluded.

1965 - Grand Slam failed. Indian offensive also failed. But India had to return more land as it captured more.

1971 - Pakistan should have evicted the Hindus from BD when it had the chance. Pls respect people and not call them a colony.

1999 - Peak 5353 runs on the LoC. It was not occupied by the IA. It is surrounded by 3 other peaks all occupied by IA.

1947 - Irrelevant, we still gained land, so therefore yes we won.

1965 - Incorrect, Hindustan captured less land, and persistently lied about how much land Pakistan captured (as my OP shows). And as said before, Grand Slam occurred before the war started.

1971 - That's all it was, a glorified colony. The more wealthy/religious people from East Pakistan along with the Urdu speakers got to join us, but everyone else was simply under our boot for over 20 years (not the first time West Pakistanis ruled over the area, the Punjabi General Shahbaz Khan Kamboh did the same under the Mughal Empire).

1999 - It is the dominating peak in the area, as per even the Hindustani army, and it's not the only peak Pakistan has kept from the Kargil War. The Hindustani military's claim of it being from the Pakistani side of the LOC is laughably wrong propaganda, because if that were the case, why did they so desperately try to take it back?

Sure you don't and Hitler was actually Jamaican. Your biological fathers must all be hindus who raped your mothers whilst your cucked men folk watched........

Leave this one be, he's pretty decent.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

1947 - Irrelevant, we still gained land, so therefore yes we won.

1965 - Incorrect, Hindustan captured less land, and persistently lied about how much land Pakistan captured (as my OP shows). And as said before, Grand Slam occurred before the war started.

1971 - That's all it was, a glorified colony. The more wealthy/religious people from East Pakistan along with the Urdu speakers got to join us, but everyone else was simply under our boot for over 20 years (not the first time West Pakistanis ruled over the area, the Punjabi General Shahbaz Khan Kamboh did the same under the Mughal Empire).

1999 - It is the dominating peak in the area, as per even the Hindustani army, and it's not the only peak Pakistan has kept from the Kargil War. The Hindustani military's claim of it being from the Pakistani side of the LOC is laughably wrong propaganda, because if that were the case, why did they so desperately try to take it back?



Leave this one be, he's pretty decent.

I will if you say so but no indian is decent. Even if they think they are Muslims.

 

[Hamza913]

I will if you say so but no indian is decent. Even if they think they are Muslims.

He's only Hindustani by nationality, which he has no control over. Ideologically, he has no connection with them and even genetically, Hindustani Muslims are slightly different to their Kafir counterparts.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Not as much as your mama is fantasizing. Her Ghand-hole is very sore right now...........

If you don't like PDF and consider us as low-lives you can always leave PDF. No one is forcing you to stay here. Do you want to see a Pakistani lund in your mama's Ghand-hole?....is that why you are here?...........

Whil I love your vigorous defence of Pakistan but please try to draw line. Some of these comments are well below the 'zone'. Also I don't want you to get banned. It's always a joy reading your over the top, effusive posts. Kind of puts a smile on my face.

All is fair in war but even then are should be rules of propriety.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

He's only Hindustani by nationality, which he has no control over. Ideologically, he has no connection with them and even genetically, Hindustani Muslims are slightly different to their Kafir counterparts.

Bro, from personal experience, indian so called "Muslims" are IDENTICAL to hindus and sikhs bar religion. They all look and act the same to me.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Bro, from personal experience, indian so called "Muslims" are IDENTICAL to hindus and sikhs bar religion. They all look and act the same to me.

I would say it applies to about 98% of them. If not they are outliers. It's like me and you in UK are not the representative of typical British. But as you say for all intents and purposes they are composite units that make up Gangadesh like Biharis, Odishans, Bengalis, Tamils, Keralites, Karnatakans who converted. By conversion your ethnic group remains the same. However there is a small sliver who trace their roots from our part of the world and migrated there before 1947.

 

[Hamza913]

Bro, from personal experience, indian so called "Muslims" are IDENTICAL to hindus and sikhs bar religion. They all look and act the same to me.

Most of the time, I'd agree, but there is a sizeable minority that is different, and @AfrazulMandal is part of that minority.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

If you look at Pakistani Christians it's obvious that most are shudras that converted by the British and they migrated with them as British oved into the Indus region. But their faces expose the Ganga heritage. By converting to Christianty they did not become English, similarly a Bihari converting to Islam is not going to become a Pakhtun, Punjabi, Sindhi or Balochi. He will remain a Muslim Bihari with Ganga writ on his face.

but there is a sizeable minority that is different

I agree there is outliers but I would not call them sizeable. These 'outliers' can be found amongst Sikhs and even Hindus.

 

[EpiiC]

The only therapy needed is for the phuddi of your mama because of your papa's little weiner.........heard your mama likes to swallow it as well.........

Dude get over it Pakistan never won a war against India.... Mainly due to numbers..... Like Bel vs Germany.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Dude get over it Pakistan never won a war against India.... Mainly due to numbers..... Like Bel vs Germany.

IRREFUTABLE , GENUINE, AUTHENTIC, RELIABLE & HONEST evidence to support your claims. Not meaningless conjecture and unsubstantiated narratives. If not then you are spreading false indianistic lies like the millions spouted each day by those creatures.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

I will if you say so but no indian is decent. Even if they think they are Muslims.

To me Indian Muslims are Indians. I draw no distinction. Period. They are complicit. And I can argue my case powerfully. There are about 4 million Kashmir Muslims [don't have exact number so forgive] but have given nothing but grief to India. As we speak 4 million Kashmiri's are keeping half a million man army occupied. Think about that. The problem is when Kashmiri's are only 4 in 1,350 million they don't stand a chance. That is ratio of one in 340. But still 1/340 have given India a headache and keep entire Indian Army group occupied.

Now think about Indian Muslims. There is 180 million Indian Musims and make one in 7. If this 1/7 went awol like Kashmiri Muslims they would bring India to it's knees in a week. At 180 million the number is larger then most Muslim countries bar a few. Russia's population is 120 million and indeed is almost equal to Pakistan's population. However you don't hear a peep from Indian Muslims other then a lynching here and there. Now that must mean they are loyal to India or they are irredeemably 'bozdil'. I refuse to accept that all 180 million are 'bozdil'. For instance their co-ethnic brothers are fighting under the Naxalite brand. To sum it up -

Kashmiri Muslims ~ 4 million causing grief to India and facing Indian Army bullets everyday.
Indian Muslims ~ 180 million ~ not a sound other then a lynching here or there when they indulge in beef.

 

[El Sidd]

If you look at Pakistani Christians it's obvious that most are shudras that converted by the British and they migrated with them as British oved into the Indus region. But their faces expose the Ganga heritage. By converting to Christianty they did not become English, similarly a Bihari converting to Islam is not going to become a Pakhtun, Punjabi, Sindhi or Balochi. He will remain a Muslim Bihari with Ganga writ on his face.

I agree there is outliers but I would not call them sizeable. These 'outliers' can be found amongst Sikhs and even Hindus.

You mentioned all Linguistic Groups not ethnic Groups. Any specific reason ?

What is your final solution to the alleged Ganga infestation in Pakistan? I heard Australians have the lead in ideas Until Now

 

[Hamza913]

I agree there is outliers but I would not call them sizeable. These 'outliers' can be found amongst Sikhs and even Hindus.

I'm talking ideologically, not in terms of phenotype.

If you look at Pakistani Christians it's obvious that most are shudras that converted by the British and they migrated with them as British oved into the Indus region. But their faces expose the Ganga heritage. By converting to Christianty they did not become English, similarly a Bihari converting to Islam is not going to become a Pakhtun, Punjabi, Sindhi or Balochi. He will remain a Muslim Bihari with Ganga writ on his face.

I disagree, I think they are native to the Indus but yes they are clearly mostly low caste converts (not all of them though).

 

[Suriya]

May Pakistan be blessed with many more victories like these

Inshallah Inshallah

My honest opinion? And I owe it to myself to express what I really think. At best Pakistan drew in 2 wars and lost in 5. At worse Pakistan lost all 5 out of 5 wars. Just to clarify at least one member of every generation in my family tree has served in Pak military and have fought in all wars with exception of Kargil. Do I feel any shame? No. The most vaunted military machine of the 20th century was the German Werhmacht. It lost every war in the 20th century. The reality is in every war Pakistan has faced insurmountable odds. India is simply far, far, far larger then Pakistan. India has greater population and greater resources. At the end of day the crushing numbers count.

Somebody pls ban this Sindhi traitor !