SamantK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 5,559
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
You guys don't agree with your leaders and abuse them.
You guys do not agree to the facts and trash them.
Read Post# 537
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You guys don't agree with your leaders and abuse them.
You guys do not agree to the facts and trash them.
What Subash's, Sardar's and others couldn't achieve then - what can they achieve now. You are welcome to bring them back. And, their reincarnation may also not be in the same form!
What did Sardar & Subash not achieve?
Dude, India is a country not under a dictator.. decisions are seldom taken alone..
Kashmir was the result of some more too, one important guy named VP Menon
We are not blind that we do not point out the mistakes done by some whether they be our leaders, its not to discredit them but to make sure those mistakes are not repeated.
I know that concept is difficult for you to understand, but then that is how things stand.
Thank you. That is what I wanted to highlight - Just Plain Facts.
You guys don't agree with your leaders and abuse them.
You guys do not agree to the facts and trash them.
When the reality would squarely face you, hide your face in the sand and call yourself Ostrich.
Hey @Black Widow
You guys abuse Nehru for being for one thing and Gandhi for another thing and other leaders for many other things. There is nothing new in it.
When you don't even show grace for those who helped and fought for creation of India, your own country, I got nothing more to tell you.
You guys don't agree with your leaders and abuse them.
You guys do not agree to the facts and trash them.
When the reality would squarely face you, hide your face in the sand and call yourself Ostrich.
In dictatorship the cronies are chosen by the dictators as well, in democracy it is at-least a larger collective wisdom.Even dictators seldom take their decisions alone. As in Democracy, they also have cronies around them.
Pakistan is always about black or white, we would not have had even that part of Kashmir but thanks to your Quaid and his tribals..VP Menon was a good Indian. He did what he was asked to do. But he failed in his mission. You don't have all of Kashmir and it is still up in flames as it was in 1947, even after over 60 years. So, what has changed, if at all !
It certainly was not me! Neither that guy took permission from all the Indians.. we still have some who hate him, it is not an uncommon phenomenon if you know what I mean... But how will you know what I mean, you are far from facts and reasoning..Then why did you kill Gandhi? Was this done to avoid him being discredited.
Dont get over dramatic now, you decide who respects facts and who dont.
I find it hilarious,that you think kabzaa is done by other people and stop crying.
Pakistan is always about black or white, we would not have had even that part of Kashmir but thanks to your Quaid and his tribals..
Their move went so wrong in Kashmir and the people whom they claimed to be liberating turned against them. One Kashmiri friend told me that people turned too much anti-Pakistan in 1948.Pakistan is always about black or white, we would not have had even that part of Kashmir but thanks to your Quaid and his tribals.
One of them was Maulana Maududi who was from "princely state of Hyderabad" who pioneered radicalization of Pakistan. Then Ziaul Haq was also from Indian side of Punjab.Sau baat ki ek baat...
We are also grateful to Jinnah Sahab he locked & took all the radicals from India to other side of present day Indian borders !
Self deleted.
They had to, the tribals which were supposed to seize control started raping and pillaging.. The Kashmiris knew where these tribals were from.. also we have a member here who belongs to one of those tribals and is proud of what they did in Kashmir.. go figure!Their move went so wrong in Kashmir and the people whom they claimed to be liberating turned against them. One Kashmiri friend told me that people turned too much anti-Pakistan in 1948.
One of them was Maulana Maududi who was from "princely state of Hyderabad" who pioneered radicalization of Pakistan. Then Ziaul Haq was also from Indian side of Punjab.
@Joe Shearer
Increase and decrease of the pain threshold on a set of people does affect. But can continuous infliction and application of pain on a same set of people for over tens of years, kill their desires. I don't think so. What it does is that they become tolerant to more pain and a stage comes where even increased application of pain may not matter. The result is even more popular and more vicious response.
Effect, not effort; reading implies reading accurately.
Unlike us humble folk down in the undergrowth, attention-getters are chrome-yellow in the correct places. Look up Mandrill.
As for the second lesson, work for one line. One word would be better; the fact that such short sentences cannot be printed should not deter you. Just think of the vast improvement in quality you would have achieved single-handed.
You're welcome. I hope you meant me, though I don't know which bit of information stirred you into comment. You're welcome anyway.
I don't know if this is correct. The Pakistanis ceded the Shaksgam Valley. I'm not sure that it forms part of Aksai Chin.
They think that the partition of India wad on communal lines and majority Muslim provinces were to go to Pakistan, and conversely. Few of them even know that besides British India, the British colony, there were 562 princes who had treaties with the Crown, but not with British India. The moment the British left, they became free. They were under no obligation to join either side on the basis of the percentage of each religion that they had.