What's new

How Indian army protected 90000 Pakistani soldiers in BD

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Says the guy who doesn't know the difference between Hamoodur Rahman commission n "mujib ur Rahman commission" which the fool imagined himself..



Another bs source with no facts or proof... 2 books by Richard n Leo , And Sarmila Bose contain actual research not just Heresay ....or we heard,they said etc B.S!

Well you call it BS or whatever..it was a study conducted by well established institution and published in very prestigious journal in 1976 and it is a number which most neutral experts agree on...So suit yourself.
 
.
Well you call it BS or whatever..it was a study conducted by well established institution and published in very prestigious journal in 1976 and it is a number which most neutral experts agree on...So suit yourself.


Oh please spare me.. Only Richard Sisson,Leon Rose n Ms Bose did collect solid data.. Interviews of survivors,deployment of troops,interviews of the army officers involved,recorded data and so on .. Even explained the geography of those areas ... Unlike the David fella who made a short film in collaboration with a British indian lady n govt of Bangladesh ..

Heck even archer bloods telegrams wer full of crap n Heresay .. Tht he "heard" from somebody who was there or who heard it from another frnd.... Heck even he contradicts himself in his autobiography ..

Anyways I've gotta sleep its 5:25 am!

Will continue this discussion later..
 
.
Oh please spare me.. Only Richard Sisson,Leon Rose n Ms Bose did collect solid data.. Interviews of survivors,deployment of troops,interviews of the army officers involved,recorded data and so on .. Even explained the geography of those areas ... Unlike the David fella who made a short film in collaboration with a British indian lady n govt of Bangladesh ..

As i said before suit your self..the study wasn't conducted by David Bergman but by International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh that too immediately after the war and not forty years later.
 
.
How the **** does this 90,000 soldier is even accepted? Most of these men were clerics,govt employees,engineers,doctors etc etc... The total deployment of army was 34,000 .. 20,000 when the conflict began ... Our of the 34,000 .. Only 23,000 were infantry or fighting troops..
read Post#19
 
.
Then that constitutes as war crime and had Soviet union been on the loosing side, it was these individual soldiers, who would have been tried and executed.

The commanders gave them a free hand and showed no interest in taking action. They were responsible and would have been tried.
I doubt that thousands of Red Army soldiers would have been given a trial by a war tribunal anyway.
 
.
The commanders gave them a free hand and showed no interest in taking action. They were responsible and would have been tried.
I doubt that thousands of Red Army soldiers would have been given a trial by a war tribunal anyway.

First hand accounts exists of Russian soldiers forcing themselves on women in Berlin fleeing in panic , when the women yelled for their political commissars.. but some of these women were shot too ..when they started yelling.

Incidents of rape were only common in Red army's rear guard.
 
.
They were POW and it was the duty of india to keep them safe under Geneva convention. india did not go out of its way to do anything. it was what anyone would have done.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom