jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
You keep on running in circles and are persistently arguing over something which is nothing but mere palaver. For the last time: I never said you have no reason to reply or interfere. To your offensive proverbial analogy, my reply was.
To which you replied:
And all my subsquent replies from here onwards where to clarify that I never QUOTED your post as I wasn't even talking to you in the beginning, but you tried to make a case that mentioning you means, "I invoked your response and if I don't admit that, then it implies that I am trying to silence you".
Dude, you yet to understand why I make that post to begin with?
You called on me, you said it never happened because you didn't use @, granted, but then you also said you never said I do not have a right to response to your post. Yet, you are saying what I am saying here is trying to "silence" or "sway" the moderator team.
See how many different nationality come up here and talk about it? And if you still think this is my fault and I started this whole thing, do go ahead and believe all you want. I am not a kind of person to judge people competence.
While you accuse me of being biased, then by taking the Chinses side, weren't you yourself is at least as biased as me? At least I was not the one who say "I am just a normal poster passing by"
If you can refer to webmasters post, he asked for names and that's exactly what members were doing. If that didn't sit well with you, don't blame us.
Regarding, Chinese members, this is what you said earlier on:
You on your own are doing a bang up job at exposing yourself. If the above excerpt from your post doesn't reflect on your bias, then I am sure the word bias needs your personal semantics treatment just as 'Quote' . Anyways, it's time for me to show maturity and not have to put up with your ad hominem responses, you may carry on though.
I have the right to response to any, I will SAY AGAIN, ANY post that refer to me, does that mean that does not sit well with me? I can be agreeing and disagreeing or even have share a non-descript post to your post, in this case, I still don't know why you first started all these WHEN I ALREADY SAID ON DAY ONE - LET THE MODERATOR DEAL WITH IT.
And biased? Yes, I am Biased, I never said I am not biased, you, on the other hand, said so yourself, which in the end you are just as biased as me. The problem is, I am a Chinese and I did live in China and Hong Kong for a long period of time, that OBSERVATION is legit unless you can counter proof otherwise, but I doubt you can actually do it. So, at least I have a valid reason to be biased, what's yours?