Hindu Mahasabha to build Godse’s temple

[coffee_cup]

wikipedia defines western secularism... separation of state and religion... indian secularism is different... its not separation.. but upholding every religion equally.. if one religion is granted something then every other religion will be granted the same status or govt. resources...

Ok I got it, India is not a secular country by Western standards.


Question: What is the official state religion of india?

 

[Dem!god]

I bet they wont be allowed by the government to build such a temple or else soon there would be a call to build memorials for Satwant Singh and Beant Singh who killed Indira Gandhi.

i dont think, any one can stop them.. other than on charge of law and order deterioration.... any one can build these things on their pvt. property..

Ok I got it, India is not a secular country by Western standards.


Question: What is the official state religion of india?

there is no western standard.

none.

 

[Levina]

i dont think, any one can stop them.. other than on charge of law and order deterioration.... any one can build these things on their pvt. property..
.

If so by now there would have been several temples for likes of Godse.

 

[Hindustani78]

Fool .I also support them and I also voted for BJP govt.
We are also satisfied by their performances.
But Govt cant do anything about some of these morons.After all law and order is a state initiative.

I can imagine it is creating problems for ruling party

Ghar Wapsi is tarnishing Narendra Modi's image - Economic Times
By VV Augustine, Vice President, Minority Morcha, BJP

As a practicing Christian, it is my right to celebrate. Suppose, I say you are a Hindu, don't celebrate your festival, will it be right? For our country's progress, Indians from all religions need to work together. In fact, since Hindus are a majority in the country, they should safeguard smaller religions.

I have been a member of the BJP for the past 21 years and was also member of the National Minority Commission between 2003 and 2006. I can tell you that both Narendra Modi and the BJP are very much secular.

Bharatiya Janata Party
List of Office Bearers & National Executive

 

[Dem!god]

If so by now there would have been several temples for likes of Godse.

yes there could hv been, but no body tried it till now, lets see hw comes out..
+ public criticism is other thing.. very few can dare to go against society... moreover till now godse has always been portrayed -ve.

 

[coffee_cup]

there is no western standard.

none.

Indeed there is a globally accepted Western standard for secularism, I just posted the definition in one of my previous posts. Summed up, it says separation of religion and state.

And by that Western definition (read standard), India is not a secular country.

Right?

 

[Dem!god]

Indeed there is a globally accepted Western standard for secularism, I just posted the definition in one of my previous posts. Summed up, it says separation of religion and state.

And by that Western definition (read standard), India is not a secular country.

Right?

again... there is no western standard...

 

[NKVD]

Well Uncle , Hindu Maha Sabha was started for Hindu politcal unity in early 1900 and Bharat Ratna Madan Mohan Malaviya was one of the founding member of Hindu Maha Sabha and during that time Madan Mohan Malaviya was even president of Indian national congress. Savakar even become part of Hindu Maha Sabha in the 20's. and from Hindu Maha Sabha member only RSS was established in 1925.

Yes savarkar was president of Hindu mahasabha of 20's perhaps his ideology was to broad and was to only extended to not one organisation but as rightwing politics he was biggest critics of Gandhi soft stand and Congress appeasement politics.perhaps this why he was branded as conspirators if Gandhi's murder but he was acquitted.I personally believe he was too great person spiritually I don't think he ever commit such cowardly deed.

 

[NKVD]

Indeed there is a globally accepted Western standard for secularism, I just posted the definition in one of my previous posts. Summed up, it says separation of religion and state.

And by that Western definition (read standard), India is not a secular country.

Right?

Who are West to judge by our national standards they are bunch of imperialists who are just proud of their body colour.
India gets its powers from hinduism which the core of our constitution which certified by supreme court of India.we don't need western imperialistic & materialistic ideology.

 

[coffee_cup]

Who are West to judge by our national standards they are bunch of imperialists who are just proud of their body colour.
India gets its powers from hinduism which the core of our constitution which certified by supreme court of India.we don't need western imperialistic & materialistic ideology.

Calm down dude, just trying to understand what sort of country india is per constitution.

So does India's constitution say that "Hinduism is the core of Indian constitution" ?

Could you kindly point me to the relevant articles in Indian constitution?

 

[Hindustani78]

Yes savarkar was president of Hindu mahasabha of 20's perhaps his ideology was to broad and was to only extended to one organisation but as rightwing politics he was biggest critics of Gandhi soft stand and Congress appeasement politics.perhaps this why he was branded as conspirators if Gandhi's murder but he was acquitted.I personally believe he was too great spiritually I don't he ever commit such cowardly deed.

V D Savakar was president of the Hindu Mahasabha in 1937 and was critical of Quit India Movement 1942 and he was not just against Gandhi but even against the congress for the whole. Sardar Patel and the whole congress working committee members were jailed for 3 years for mass civil disobedience in the form of Quit India Movement on August 7, 1942.

 

[NKVD]

Calm down dude, just trying to understand what sort of country india is per constitution.

So does India's constitution say that "Hinduism is the core of Indian constitution" ?

Could you kindly point me to the relevant articles in Indian constitution?

Supreme court of India is sole protector of the Indian constitution better ask them why they passed such judgement. They are better authority of to Explain.

 

[NKVD]

V D Savakar was president of the Hindu Mahasabha in 1937 and was critical of Quit India Movement 1942 and he was not just against Gandhi but even against the congress for the whole. Sardar Patel and the whole congress working committee members were jailed for 3 years for mass civil disobedience in the form of Quit India Movement on August 7, 1942.

Perhaps he was a uncrowned leader of mahasabha only officially crowned after but the biggest setback of of Hindu mahasabha was when Dr hedkewar left them in 1925 and form RSS.

 

[Hindustani78]

Perhaps he was a uncrowned leader of mahasabha only officially crowned after but the biggest setback of of Hindu mahasabha was when Dr hedkewar left them in 1925 and form RSS.

Hindu Maha Sabha is like the parent organization .

 

[NKVD]

Hindu Maha Sabha is like the parent organization .

But lost its charm and intellual charm after savarkar death.or say Gandhi's death after which they banned