Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gandhi was a weak idealist who almost destroyed India. Had it been him, we would have never joined Indian Union ever.
After reading what he did to India, I am thankful that my people didn't have to go through his idealism that you other Indians were force-fed and propagated with.
Though I have no natural position on Godse, he did what he had to do and thankfully did it before India got any smaller due to Gandhi's unrealistic world view.
And who the hell gave him the title FATHER OF NATION?
Who is Nehru to give him that title?
He was one of the many freedom fighters who tried his methods and though it miserably failed, it did garner a success due to British destruction in Europe in WW2.
There are thousands of sons of India who fought and died like heros and our history books are full of them.
Gandhi did nothing different.
You don't stand and fast in front of mass murdering foreigners when they are killing, raping and looting your country.
You fight them, and win.
Gandhi simply got laurels for what Hitler did to UK in WW2.
Had there been no WW2, the British would have simply shot him and continued their attacks on India.
Gandhi was a weak idealist who almost destroyed India. Had it been him, we would have never joined Indian Union ever.
After reading what he did to India, I am thankful that my people didn't have to go through his idealism that you other Indians were force-fed and propagated with.
Though I have no natural position on Godse, he did what he had to do and thankfully did it before India got any smaller due to Gandhi's unrealistic world view.
And who the hell gave him the title FATHER OF NATION?
Who is Nehru to give him that title?
He was one of the many freedom fighters who tried his methods and though it miserably failed, it did garner a success due to British destruction in Europe in WW2.
There are thousands of sons of India who fought and died like heros and our history books are full of them.
Gandhi did nothing different.
You don't stand and fast in front of mass murdering foreigners when they are killing, raping and looting your country.
You fight them, and win.
Gandhi simply got laurels for what Hitler did to UK in WW2.
Had there been no WW2, the British would have simply shot him and continued their attacks on India.
You can say this now wholeheartedli because India is became a fully united full potential nation But where did we get this unity ?You should ask that for yourselves.
He was correct when he used non violence method not because of that it was successful against UK but did a hell of the work to join this nation.Or create a force in every nook and corner of this nation for uniting.
WW2 was just a circumstances.If there was no Gandhi and there was a WW2 there would have been a 100 of nations in this subcontinent.
Because he was one that seeded unity idea in every state through K Kelappan and Kamraj in South India to nationalists in Jammu and Kashmir.
The unity was not the work of Gandhi. Again, you need to recheck your history that most of what is taught to kids as 'education'.
Uniting India was the single-handed effort of Sardar Patel who deserves far more credit for India than we give him. Also, it is the sacrifice of thousands of freedom fighters who fought like lions against the foreign occupiers and weakened their base with relentless assaults, suffered pains and torture in Andaman jails, gave up their family lives, their parents, their spouses and everyone else for the country.
NOT GANDHI.
He is just made a god by Congress who used his name to ruin and rule India for all this time.
You really don't know the meaning of non-violence.
What is non-violence? It is the practise of being peaceful, calm and loving towards everyone and creating an amicable environment for all.
It doesn't mean you pussyfoot those who are killing your men, raping your women, murdering your heroes, descecrating your national ideals and looting your resources for 2 damn centuries.
I would like to see how non-violent you are if I come and take over your house and ask your family to get out.
Then let's see where all your ideals are buddy.
A big lie that politicians of that era propagated and brainwashed entire India with. Sorry, but a British stooge who was always in their good books, danced and sang with them in private parties but claimed to 'lead' poor, weak and looted Indians in the public, is NO hero.
WW2 is the final death nail that hammered into the British empire, when they started weakening.
It was the sepoy mutiny, the relentless attacks by likes of Azad, Netaji, Udham Singh, Bhagat Singh and many other brave Indians who gave the country their freedom. Not Gandhi.
Sorry, brother. Please research again.
Gandhi did try, I am not denying it. But he simply wasn't capable enough to lead the country.
A country is not the same as a person. Emotions and idealisms don't run a country. Rationale, dedication and common sense run it.
If these morons had kept their wagging tongues under control then BJP might 've won a few more seats in J&K.why temple...
it should be memorial or something...making temple makes no sense....
why not... if they want to build a memorial.. whats wrong in it... indira forcefully made trimurti bhavan as nehru memorial...If these morons had kept their wagging tongues under control then BJP might 've won a few more seats in J&K.
But hey why should there be a memorial for Godse at all??
BEEEE ESSS. Dude for a very intelligent guy you read very little of History. Let me put it you- the Hindu right was NEVER powerful enough to get the Brits to quit. It was so weak that Brits didn't even bother to engage with them (unlike the muslim league). in fact if they had been in the forefront, they would have been cutting deals with rajas and maharajas. It was Gandhis leadership and the congress under him that did the job, all the way to botting out the kings by Patel.
I'm sure Nehru had more fans than Godse.why not... if they want to build a memorial.. whats wrong in it... indira forcefully made trimurti bhavan as nehru memorial...
Hindu maha sabha is attention deficient now.First of All Hindu Maha_sabha is Not Even A Part of Sangh Parivar See List of Members of Parivar Below.
Sangh Parivar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Secondly Hindu Mahasabha not Right wing But Far-right politics Lost its Ideology Since his Founder Member Madan Mohan Malaviya who was Also great Congress Leader Died In 1946 .before it was Lala Lajpat Rai We all Know how great they Both Are but Unlike RSS they are Headless organisation after there Leaders Death they Lost there Path.
@DRAY @levina
doesn't matter... more or less is not a criteria...I'm sure Nehru had more fans than Godse.
They 're attention deficient now.