gogbot
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,201
- Reaction score
- 0
There got to be technical reasons behinds its delay
Technology restrictions,
Testing facilities infrastructure,
R&D into new materials
Engineering aircraft from designs
underfunded for the majority of the development
Requirements creep.
The reasons for delays is vast , citing one and pointing to it alone is not very fair.
and its design flaws are reality which you tried to cover up in your justifications.....
Every design has deficiencies that are both considered and calculated.
Calling them flaws is simply inaccurate.
though justification alone is no solution to answer the questions which your own media is asking in loud.
Most of Our media knows **** about defense news , to this day they can't get the dates right for the Tejas project start.
They compare LCH to Comanche and make mess by quoting officals out of context.
You should consider carefully what the media is saying and think about what is really happening.
Next, I don't want to start a comparison
I agree , but then...
here but i reject your claim that LCA exceeds JFT in any parameter let aside TWR.
IF this was your opinion , fine. But then you made this claim.
I think you have not seen in Farnborough fully weighed JFT took off withing 400 meters.
LCA-N will take off in under 290m.
About the same length as IAC-1 , INS vikrant.