Abingdonboy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 29,597
- Reaction score
- 46
- Country
- Location
[/QUOTE]That was the initial goal, but with all the delays of the project, the future potential is getting lower as well. By now and with MMRCA as an alternative, 200 LCAs will be the max for IAF, which still is a good number, the problem is only, that we fail to do things simple like the Chinese can, we often want to much and make things too complicated again.
Take the MK2 for instance, we had weight and thrust issues, so instead of fixing these things only and induct the version with MMR as soon as possible, we now added fuel tanks, more avionics, IRST, possibly even a new radar and to make it even worse, also want a complete new cockpit. These changes obviously needs more time, with more vulnerability to new delays as well, which explains the hasitation to further orders.
However, I agree with you that IAF should have ordered and inducted the MK1s way earlier, since they are clearly more capable than many of the older Migs, but I think that has to do with the long and slow testing process of ADA/HAL as well.
I am in no way suggesting HAL is not at fault, but IAF needs be a little less stingy, show more confidence in HAL, and in other words be a little punjabi (if you know what i mean). IAF needs to chill, needs to make an order book of atleast 350 jet... so HAL can dedicate a seperate line for MK2, provide mk2 in three tranches. Accept the first tranche with MMR Passive radar, next tranche with better engine and AESA, and then keep developing it.
Sancho- I get that the LCA's delays in part can be explained by the IAF constantly changing their requirements. But this is fair enough surely in keeping with the IAF's philosophy of fighting quantity with quality. The IAF is not a force that seeks to put up sup-standard fighters with deficences made up by fielding them in huge numbers. This is a doctrinal issue.