JohnWick
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
- Messages
- 3,085
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Your Su-30 mki if billions of dollars are not invested on them will become another mig-21.....Again I will say that it's your point of view.
Our view is different, you don't had much needed fighter plane. Because you were having only one decent fighter f16 aircraft in your inventory. You inducted the jf 17 even not being fully developed.
Indian case is just different, we were already having 4th generation aircraft's in front line duty (su30mki, mirage 2000 and mig 29). We were not in hurray to induct a under developed aircraft. Many critical features are added and getting add in jf 17 after inducted in inventory.
Again, pls technology prove that jf 17 aircraft is superior to present hal tejas.
Overall, hal tejas mk1a will be future of Indian airforce just like jf17 block 3 for Pakistan.
But, our front line deployed aircraft's will be much more capable aircrafts like su 30mki, Rafael, AMCA... Etc
36 rafales are too small in number for IAF against J-20 J-10C and Su-35 of PLA and
70 PAF JF-17 Thunder block 3.
Mirage 2000 proves to be an absolute shit against the current Block 2 of thunder on 27 feb....As we had easily jammed their radars....
And it is not India where you can lie openly
IAF used 60 years old mig-21 as its front line fighter.....Crashing here and there and you are saying that we are reluctant to induct an under developed fighter????