What's new

H6K for Pakistan Strategic Forces

and pleases tell us how this gonna be happen???, all in all your H-6K usage theory is all wrong and really stupid

i cant belive i have to explain this, ur an elite member... they are the best chance to sink Indian aircraft carriee group with more than 10 C 802s armed on them ..
 
.
raad is 600kms, 10 minimum can be armed on H6K and can take out s 400 batteries at standby distance..

i sense so much fear in u.. there is a counter to every threat
don't need H-6K then its easily achievable if we get JH-7A or J-16
 
.
Fix the map, it clearly shows Indian Occupied Kashmir and Azad Kashmir Part of the Indian state. Don't use such kind of maps and also to create awareness among people.

who pays a damn what others create.. if u do pay a damn pls call google.. i dont carw about trivial things, trivial mind deal with trivial things
 
.
who pays a damn what others create.. if u do pay a damn pls call google.. i dont carw about trivial things, trivial mind deal with trivial things

Bytch, you might not care but we do. Abide by the forum rules or take your sh1tty *** away from this forum @waz
 
.
Bytch, you might not care but we do. Abide by the forum rules or take your sh1tty *** away from this forum @waz

what an uncivilized and low class reaponse, you need to be banned for cursing out.. mods pls ban this unclassy uncivilized individual or please aend him to Modi sarkar so he can parlay with rakshaks..
 
.
i cant belive i have to explain this, ur an elite member... they are the best chance to sink Indian aircraft carriee group with more than 10 C 802s armed on them ..
No need to get H-6K we need deep strike jets that can defend itself from the enemy, J-16/JH-7A will be the best option for this and H-6K need also an escort, we have different tactics than relying on only one plat form (H-6K) to sink Indian aircraft carriers, these tactics are fired from land/ sea/under the sea/air from stand off distances
 
.
No need to get H-6K we need deep strike jets that can defend itself from the enemy, J-16/JH-7A will be the best option for this and H-6K need also an escort, we have different tactics than relying on only one plat form (H-6K) to sink Indian aircraft carriers, these tactics are fired from land/ sea/under the sea/air from stand off distances

fair enough, that can be a good option, a muti role truck like J16 or its like
 
. .
what an uncivilized and low class reaponse, you need to be banned for cursing out.. mods pls ban this unclassy uncivilized individual or please aend him to Modi sarkar so he can parlay with rakshaks..

Ouch, did I hurt trivial mind's e-feelings? The only one here I can see low-class is you. :lol: Moreover, why did you bring in your uncle's (Modi) name? :lol:
 
.
Ouch, did I hurt trivial mind's e-feelings? The only one here I can see low-class is you. :lol: Moreover, why did you bring in your uncle's (Modi) name? :lol:

.. kisses for u.. enjoy ! life is bigger than gwtting back at someone.. look around how beautiful this life is, relax and be blessed..
 
. . .
Oh bahi this era is for STAND OFF MISSILES eras no need to go deep inside enemy territory, Few dozens of cruise missiles from stand off ranges do the better job than YOUR BOMBER IN A ENEMY TERRITORY
Bhai the purpose of stand off weapons is precisely to be used on a plane like this. Imagine one plane carrying 4-5 RAAD missiles instead of Mirage carrying only 1, its gives us the range plus the option to target multiple targets by 1 plane. No other platform currently in PAF gives this much flexibility. The planes does not need to venture that deep inside India to hit them but from a safer distance can cause alot of destruction specially on Indian economic hubs once a full scale war starts.
 
. .
look go to wiki its already said BARAK-8 has range of 150 km , and 100 km SAMs doesn't include in long range category but in Medium range category
LRSAM (Barak-8ER)[edit]
42px-Ambox_current_red.svg.png

This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2019)
An ER (extended range) variant of the Barak 8 is under development, which will see the missiles maximum range increased to 150 km.[21] Designed to engage multiple beyond visual range threats, the low launch signature Barak-8ER is understood to retain the same autopilot/inertial navigation system and active radar seeker guidance as the Barak-8, although some modifications to the software and to the missile control surfaces are likely. The booster increases the length of the missile at launch from its current 4.5 m to nearly 6 m, although the length in flight after the booster has been jettisoned may be slightly less than the base Barak-8 missile, if a TVC is not present. The missile diameter and fin spans are thought to be the same as the base Barak-8. The booster weight is currently unknown, although the missile's weight after the booster has been jettisoned is the same as that for the current Barak-8 configuration.

Levy said that initial operational capability (IOC) for Barak-8ER will first be declared for the naval variant, followed by IOC for the land variant. He declined to comment on a launch customer for Barak-8ER, but noted "existing Barak-8 customers will be interested in this configuration because it offers additional capability to their current system".[21] The missile is expected to equip the Indian Navy's future Visakhapatnam-class destroyers.[29][30]
 
.
Back
Top Bottom