What's new

Gujarat HC raps Narendra Modi govt for 'inaction' during post-Godhra riots

.
modi is the best leader in india today....

haters can go suck an egg...

modi is the best ....:toast_sign:

If a perpetrator of mass murder is the best leader in India today, Pakistanis and Chinese are justified in denigrating our country.

india's social fabric is predominantly hindu with other religions just influencing it in parts....any attempt to de-stabilize that can lead to disaster too...

Oh so you're a fascist now.
 
. . . .
If a perpetrator of mass murder is the best leader in India today, Pakistanis and Chinese are justified in denigrating our country.

Then first give justice to everyone that the "secular" parties have committed horrors against. Then talk of Gujarat alone.

Oh so you're a fascist now.

Better to be a Fascist than a Hindu-hating secularist coward. I say this despite not being a Hindu.
 
. .
Not condemning the attack was the best thing to do in that situation. Narendra Modi purposely inflamed the situation by saying that "It was a pre-planned act. The culprits will have to pay for it. It was not communal violence. It was a violent, one-sided, collective act by only one community."

Seriously, the congress is not without blood on its hands, as the 84 riots will attest to. However, I simply don't see how you guys can defend Modi here. His statements (not to mention other testimony) make it obvious that he was complicit in the massacre of thousands of muslims.

1. The issue is whether reveling his suspicion to public constitutes to criminality or not. It's not a right thing to do as a CM but is it a crime?
2. Given the asymmetry of the casualties(800:250), one might come to that conclusion but i don't think anyone is innocent here. read the report about mosques inciting youth saying "Islam khatrey mein hain".
 
. .
^^ Thanks but no thanks.

---------- Post added at 10:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 PM ----------

1. The issue is whether reveling his suspicion to public constitutes to criminality or not. It's not a right thing to do as a CM but is it a crime?
2. Given the asymmetry of the casualties(800:250), one might come to that conclusion but i don't think anyone is innocent here. read the report about mosques inciting youth saying "Islam khatrey mein hain".

Oh don't say that; after all mainstream Hindus and Dharmic faith people are expendable. They don't count at all especially in cases that happened much earlier than 2002.... you're wasting your time explaining how right you are to them.
 
.
Then first give justice to everyone that the "secular" parties have committed horrors against. Then talk of Gujarat alone.

I support giving justice to the victims of the 84 riots, and would support justice in any other riots if you can provide good evidence that the ruling party actively supported them.

Better to be a Fascist than a Hindu-hating secularist coward. I say this despite not being a Hindu.

Hindu-hating secularist is an oxymoron. You mean pseudo-secularists? I'd rather support a Hindu-hater than a fascist, as the Hindu-haters don't necessarily go around massacring people.

1. The issue is whether reveling his suspicion to public constitutes to criminality or not. It's not a right thing to do as a CM but is it a crime?
2. Given the asymmetry of the casualties(800:250), one might come to that conclusion but i don't think anyone is innocent here. read the report about mosques inciting youth saying "Islam khatrey mein hain".

Well having seen the rest of the statements from Modi and the Gujarati BJP leadership, along with the Tehelka investigation (sure, Tehelka have their biases but given the kind of video evidence they presented for their case, I don't see how their report can be considered anything but credible), there isn't any doubt in my mind that Modi approved of the attacks against muslims and purposely looked the other way when they were happening.
 
. . .
Modi is great man leading growth and development of Gujrat. .

The Germany Economy Under Hitler

Hitler achieved notable economic and diplomatic successes during the first five years of his rule. Hitler substantially revived the economy. Unemployment, so pivotal in bringing him to power, had dropped from 6 million to less than 1 million between 1933 and 1937, this at a time when the US was still wallowing in the Depression. National production and income doubled during the same period.
 
.
Muslis are attacking and getting attacked throughout the world even in china also but people raise voice against india only. No one want to discuss why china killed muslim in riots.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom