brahmastra
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 24, 2009
- Messages
- 1,914
- Reaction score
- -1
How many of paid channels have shown this?
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Turkey may be?
Now by doing so, you are feeding those communalists who pounce on every opportunity to say that you people are intolerant. Now do you want to be a fool and give them fodder. Heck, even RSS people aren't this dumb.
First you say that the Britishers incorrectly named Hinduism a religion and then you yourself go back to calling Hinduism a religion. I'm not sure what you're trying to say at this point.
hinduism was always culture oriented way of life until these islamic invader and later the britisgers came....they who practised organized, rigid religions were not able to understand that unlike theirs
hinduism was just a way of life of people in the subcontinent and named that a religion....
90% or so. But in some places - namely Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine, there are significant populations of Arab Christians, and historically, many Arabs were Christians or Jews (and going farther back simple polytheists).
How is that revisionist? The prevalent theory has long been one of Aryan migration into India, and revisionism is the act of questioning the prevalent theory.
Anyways, do you deny that there are massive linguistic differences between Indo-European and Proto-Dravidian languages? Do you deny that the Aryan culture as presented in the Vedas was a nomadic pastoral one?
As we have witnessed from the Kushan, Hunnic, Mongol, Islamic etc. invasions, India has always been invaded from the Northwest by nomads who then settle down and become civilized farmers. India is a very fertile land and nomadic pastoralism is not indigenous to India. Thus, the Aryans who practiced nomadic pastoralism were not indigenous to India.
We have to accept all these influences of people who settled into India and fused their cultures into the Indian culture.
T
We know exactly what would happen in Syria. A small portion of the population, composed of Saudi funded wahabi fanatics would start carrying out terrorist attacks against Christians and the government would respond by massacring the terrorists. Very different from what Modi did.
that is no paranoia....examples are there all over the world.....tell me one islamic country in the whole wide world that is secular , liberal,pluralistic and tolerating of other religions....none....nilch...nada....
want india to go down that route ?
The Sabarmati Express reached Godhra Station at 07:43 on 27 February 2002, with many Hindu pilgrims on their way back from a ceremony organised by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad at the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi site.The survivor of Godhra carnage who lost his wife in attacks recalls that 3000 strong mob of Muslims were present at Signal Falia.
After its scheduled 5 minute halt, the train was pulling out when someone pulled the chain to stop it, and stones were pelted at the train by the Muslim crowd. Then the train left, but was stopped again near a railway cabin where a large Muslim mob of about 500 attacked it. During the attack, the woman's reserved coach no. S6 burned down A total of 58 Hindu pilgrims (23 men, 15 women and 20 children) were asphyxiated in the smoke, while 250 others managed to escape.Innocent victims were tagged as Kar Sevaks and sent to Ayodhya.
The train was stopped and came under attack at Signal Fadia (sometimes misspelled as Signal Falia), near Godhra Junction, by a mob presumed to be Ghanchi Muslims.
The Tribune reported:
As the train left Godhra station, one of the miscreants who had boarded it, pulled the chain alarm after some time to halt the train a km away. It was here that a large number of stone-pelting miscreants set the coach ablaze by throwing petrol bombs and dousing it with kerosene and petrol.
As per chief investigating officer Noel Parmar (Noel Parmar was the investigating officer in the Godhra case who retired in 2009 after 43 years of service in the Gujarat police. He was known to be a tough officer throughout his career and has been constantly targeted by the civil society groups fighting for the accused in the Godhra case.), following events took place that led to the train burning:
..a communal-minded group wanted to teach a lesson to the karsevaks.. February 26, 2002, they called a meeting at the Aman guesthouse near the railway station. .. They collected some 140 liters of petrol from a nearby petrol pump. Salim Paanwala went to check the train's arrival time. .. found that the Sabarmati Express was late by four hours. He verified with a ticket checker, whose testimony was taken. Paanwala went back to the guesthouse and told the people gathered there that they should take a short nap and come back around 6.30 am. When the train arrived and a crowd started gathering, stone-pelting started. The passengers of the train shut the train's doors and windows. The train moved ahead to escape the stones being hurled. At that point the accused, according to plan, came to the station with the petrol. The crowd was at that time running along with the train. This is significant. The train was halted by one of the accused by pulling the (emergency stop) chain. Razaak Kurkur and Paanwala had given some boys the duty to board the train. As per their instructions, these boys boarded the train by cutting the vestibule and entered the compartment to pour the petrol and set it on fire. The chief investigating officer also pointed out that at 7 am in the morning, a crowd doesn't assemble just like that. It was pre-planned... Around 7.43 am, when the train came, people were instructed through a microphone to reach the station. There were provocative slogans: 'Kill Hindus, long live Pakistan!' .. The crowd was the cover they needed. Without the crowd screaming and crowding the place, they would not have been successful in torching the train... just 1 litre of kerosene could not have burned S-6
I support giving justice to the victims of the 84 riots, and would support justice in any other riots if you can provide good evidence that the ruling party actively supported them.
Hindu-hating secularist is an oxymoron. You mean pseudo-secularists? I'd rather support a Hindu-hater than a fascist, as the Hindu-haters don't necessarily go around massacring people.
Well having seen the rest of the statements from Modi and the Gujarati BJP leadership, along with the Tehelka investigation (sure, Tehelka have their biases but given the kind of video evidence they presented for their case, I don't see how their report can be considered anything but credible), there isn't any doubt in my mind that Modi approved of the attacks against muslims and purposely looked the other way when they were happening.
There's no evidence against Modi either. Funny you only mention 84 when there are a whole array of events that happened post that period and throughout early 90s. See this is the thing; many don't even know what's going on in the country.
Done plenty of experiments to know the difference; both are the same.
About second part:
What is happening in Kashmir, Assam, Kerala, Andhra, Manipur etc ... please run a research through these areas. Half knowledge is worse than zero knowledge.
Wow... based on a video that hardcore law experts have failed to concretely prove, you've come to a conclusion!
---------- Post added at 08:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:58 PM ----------
Don't show evidence to secularists; they will declare it hoax.
Here is what I can get from wiki so far about Godhra :