GB should be given province status

[American Pakistani]

Ha ha ha..hypocrisy much ?

What hypocrisy?

 

[Hindustani]

Kashmir can only be solved by nukes. India or Pakistan will have to nuke one another and Pakistan will threaten to nuke New Delhi if India doesn't hand over Kashmir... I have been saying this from day 1 only way to solve Kashmir as India is too stubborn and backstabbing to trust

I love the way you people think. 72 virgins are only a matter of a few bombs. Hell with that ideology, no wonder you people are stockpiling your "atom bumb"

 

[Edevelop]

G.B should be given a province status. But the reality is every fu*king political leader out there has a conflict of interest. They are too busy already looting the regions of Sindh, Baluchistan and Punjab.

 

[Icewolf]

I love the way you people think. 72 virgins are only a matter of a few bombs. Hell with that ideology, no wonder you people are stockpiling your "atom bumb"

http://www.therealstevegray.com/wp-content/uploads/English-Mother-******.jpeg

 

[Edevelop]

Ha ha ha..hypocrisy much ?

Actually it would be good for India. We can give this excuse and throw out the UN resolution demand once for all into the dustbin.

Actually i have never understood why India views G.B as a disputed territory. If the people want to be part of Pakistan by hence demanding a province, then case should be closed.

 

[Rusty]

We cant officially make them provinces because that would hurt our claim on IOK. But I don't see why we can't make them unofficial provinces, give them all the rights of a province without declaring them to be one.

Actually i have never understood why India views G.B as a disputed territory. If the people want to be part of Pakistan by hence demanding a province, then case should be closed.

The reality is that Azad Kashmir and GB are lost to India forever, there is 0% chance India will get them and she knows it. That is why India is pushing really hard to make LOC the international border.

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

Pakistan will always stick to it but you need to understand that in Gilgit Baltistan there is a feeling of getting all benefits as other Pakistanis. I think Pakistan should give them option under UN monitoring, either they want to be a province or not, if majority chooses to be province than it should be made.

What benefits? Any sane person would their living standards improved, perhaps you should look into the composition of G&B's Assembly - I doubt it's legitimate, much like the composition of the AJK Legislature, which is decided by the power residing in IB.

If Pakistan is serious about such issues, then conduct a referendum in Kashmir on three options, in line with modern demands:

1. Independent Kashmir
2. Secession to India
3. Secession to Pakistan

Any action deviating from this is pure and simple hypocrisy and a rejection of the rights of the people of Jammu & Kashmir to decide their own future, in accordance to their own wishes.

 

[Rusty]

What benefits? Any sane person would their living standards improved, perhaps you should look into the composition of G&B's Assembly - I doubt it's legitimate, much like the composition of the AJK Legislature, which is decided by the power residing in IB.

If Pakistan is serious about such issues, then conduct a referendum in Kashmir on three options, in line with modern demands:

1. Independent Kashmir
2. Secession to India
3. Secession to Pakistan

Any action deviating from this is pure and simple hypocrisy and a rejection of the rights of the people of Jammu & Kashmir to decide their own future, in accordance to their own wishes.

While I agree with the 3 options I have to say that it is unfair to the rest of the subcontinent.
All the princely states got 2 options, India or Pakistan. They never got the 3rd option of Independence. So it would be unfair if only Kashmir got that last option.
I do agree that ALL of Kashmir and GB should get the two option. India or Pakistan and everyone else should respect that.

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

While I agree with the 3 options I have to say that it is unfair to the rest of the subcontinent.
All the princely states got 2 options, India or Pakistan. They never got the 3rd option of Independence. So it would be unfair if only Kashmir got that last option.
I do agree that ALL of Kashmir and GB should get the two option. India or Pakistan and everyone else should respect that.

Forget the subcontinent - that issue was 60 years ago, and the blame lies entirely with Pakistan for the current composition of Kashmir (i.e., split between India/Pakistan). The fact remains that the blood of the innocents -- is the blood of Kashmiris -- our blood.

 

[KS]

If Pakistan is serious about such issues, then conduct a referendum in Kashmir on three options, in line with modern demands:

1. Independent Kashmir
2. Secession to India
3. Secession to Pakistan

There is NO option for independence in the UNSC resolutions which you guys so want to implement. You cant change your demands as and when its convenient. Stop building castles in air.

Actually i have never understood why India views G.B as a disputed territory. If the people want to be part of Pakistan by hence demanding a province, then case should be closed.

Because GB (Northern Areas) was also a part of the erstwhile princely state of Kashmir. It is as much disputed as the pakistani Kashmir and together comprises P-O-K.

 

[American Pakistani]

What benefits? Any sane person would their living standards improved, perhaps you should look into the composition of G&B's Assembly - I doubt it's legitimate, much like the composition of the AJK Legislature, which is decided by the power residing in IB.

If Pakistan is serious about such issues, then conduct a referendum in Kashmir on three options, in line with modern demands:

1. Independent Kashmir
2. Secession to India
3. Secession to Pakistan

Any action deviating from this is pure and simple hypocrisy and a rejection of the rights of the people of Jammu & Kashmir to decide their own future, in accordance to their own wishes.

Pakistani believes in giving them their right of self determination. The refrendum of Kashmir has been delayed by india for 60+ years...& until the Kashmiris of Maqbooza Kashmir will not stand up seriously & demand UN to held refrendum in their land the problem will keep on going...Pakistan has always raised voice in international forums for Kashmir issue, no matter it is civilian leadership or military all stand on same ground that Kashmiris must be given right of self determination, even Pakistan's Zardari raised this issue again in UN Assembly recently.

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

Seems like all were killed by Indian Army and terrorists that have been killing people in Kashmir were just saint doing peaceful protest. Another propaganda to demonize Indian Army.

If Pakistan is serious about such issues, then conduct a referendum in Kashmir on three options, in line with modern demands:

(Though the demand for an Independent Kashmir was there in '47.) The UN Resolutions are based on the democratic principles of self determination, the right to carve out one's own identity themselves.

Another propaganda to demonize Indian Army.

Demonize: "Portray as wicked and threatening."

I think the Indian Army's done that all by itself through the atrocities it has constantly committed against the people of Kashmir.

 

[Rusty]

Forget the subcontinent - that issue was 60 years ago, and the blame lies entirely with Pakistan for the current composition of Kashmir (i.e., split between India/Pakistan). The fact remains that the blood of the innocents -- is the blood of Kashmiris -- our blood.

Even if it is 100 years old it does not matter. The deal was that you had a choice between India and Pakistan. There were states that wanted independence but they never got, so why should Kashmir get special treatment?

How does the blame lie with Pakistan entirely?
Pakistan was a new nation with no military and very little land, but was built on the notion of a homeland for Muslims of the subcontinent. Kashmir is a natural part of that homeland so should have gone to Pakistan. India, despite her enormous size has an even more enormous greed and decided to cause this problem.
And keep in mind, it is the Kashmirsis on the Indian side that are being tortured to death, not the Pakistani side.

 

[American Pakistani]

Forget the subcontinent - that issue was 60 years ago, and the blame lies entirely with Pakistan for the current composition of Kashmir (i.e., split between India/Pakistan). The fact remains that the blood of the innocents -- is the blood of Kashmiris -- our blood.

How is Pakistan responsible for the split of Kashmir between india & Pakistan?

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

Pakistani believes in giving them their right of self determination. The refrendum of Kashmir has been delayed by india for 60+ years...& until the Kashmiris of Maqbooza Kashmir will not stand up seriously & demand UN to held refrendum in their land the problem will keep on going...Pakistan has always raised voice in international forums for Kashmir issue, no matter it is civilian leadership or military all stand on same ground that Kashmiris must be given right of self determination, even Pakistan's Zardari raised this issue again in UN Assembly recently.

until the Kashmiris of Maqbooza Kashmir will not stand up seriously & demand UN to held refrendum in their land the problem will keep on going

If you mean around 100,000 dead is not "seriously", then either you're trolling or very, very cold hearted. Also, note for the record that extremist groups supported by the ISI are responsible for the eviction of near 100,000 Pandits from the Valley as well.