Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Piers the establishment Anglosaxon - caught red handed weighing up how many civilians beyond 0 should be killed as illegal retribution.
A few days ago, DW published an article citing a number of so-called experts arguing that the IDF cannot be criticized for civilian deaths, that it is a necessity and therefore Israel cannot be guilty of war crimes.
I guess you forget all those beheadings…Yes because Europeans and Americans carry out war crimes against Muslim populations quite regularly. Its not the case the other way.
Indirectly killed by the West is a codeword for being killed by a Muslim.but they are not terroist, why i am obliged to call them such just because you and western goverments say so?
and you listened him and obbeyed, do not lecture me for it.
we do not but much less then western world did and do to the muslims, in last 20 years about ten million killed directly or indirectly by west.
Saddam bought components allowing him to create chemical weapons.Yes,and I seem to remember that it was you europeans [+the uk] who supplied saddam with the bulk of his chemical weapons.
Just keeping a good old european tradition alive,eh?
The guy is right and wrong.Israeli politician has meltdown and refers to Egypt, Jordan, Syria, African Union, Iran and Turkey as 'terrorist' countries :
Your country(and other Europeans) gave Saddam chemical weapons to kill Iranians.Saddam bought components allowing him to create chemical weapons.
That is not chemical weapons. Some unscrupulous businessmen ended up in jail.