Nalwa
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 826
- Reaction score
- 0
Greater Punjab was already in de-facto in control of the Misls, when MRS launched his campaign to unite the Misls. What he did was put an end to the invasions from the West. And yes, Mughals were on the decline and the British hadn't really moved in closer to Delhi. But this was a true for a lot of different kingdoms and states. The decline of the Mughal empire doesnt take anything away from MRS' and his generals's military and organizational acumen. He saw his chance and capitalized on it.i am writing abt ur previous article . ranjit singh ruled in 19th century . muslim rule was more older. he annexed kashmir then . may be at that time the mughals were already devastated and britishers had already poured in . so ranjit got the tuime to annex lands . so u cant say pak or india are independant states coz of him .... i wud say he was a kind of baghi frm mughal govt .
and the thing i hate most abt sikhs is they started that kashmir prob . so he was not a lion . mughal empire had already broken at that time
And how did the Sikhs start the Kashmir problem? By re-conquering it from the Afghans? Read a little history and then come back.