Always Neutral
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 4,859
- Reaction score
- -20
Mister "Always Neutral", I would like to point out that you are being unnecessarily mean to the new member. If you disagree with any aspects of his analysis, slinging personal insults wont add to your credibility.
People with varying levels of knowledge, insight and investigating abilities come here, they should all be appreciated for their contributions. No ones analysis is perfect, circuitbaba has done a decent enough job. Lets not turn this into a you are better, we are better thing, and analyze its technical, tactical and strategic aspects in a purely factual way.
I for one would like to point out that it is unlikely that India will try anything like bombing Pakistani Kashmir as long as Pakistan is involved in the American lead War of Terror, because that would seriously tick Uncle Sam off as Pakistan would without a doubt quickly redeploy all its air and land assets back to our eastern frontier, and probably make peace deals with Taliban forces in the process of freeing troops up. A lot of American progress in the region would be lost, and the Americans would face the un-easy choice of losing Pakistani support in the WoT (which is quite essential) or losing a new ally in India depending on who they support during the war. Therefore the Americans are likely to keep a serious lid on things even if tension spill out between Pakistan and India in the foreseeable future.
My friend we are here to discuss viable scenarios and not play with toy soldiers.
If CB was interested in a decent job then he must do decent research.
250 Thunders ? Why not 250 Raptors ?
Regards