Here comes the low-IQ curmudgeon who is perpetually mad that his secular narrative has been laughed and mocked by Pakistanis on this forum, and all the evidence of history is against his retarded, reductionist notions that he gets from Wikipedia.
I remember people used to take you seriously, and now----you barely get interacted with on this forum since most just roll their eyes on your continuous squealing like a puppy
Let's give you few lessons in history, shall we you man-child?
Here, an Egyptian copt----who was very anti-Islam----writing about Arab-rule in Egypt and the justice it carried (which was quite unprecedented in medieval times, mind you).
View attachment 636698
Here, a report of Jizyah being
returned by Muslims when Muslim were not able to protect non-Muslims against Romans (as per the contract). Showing Jizyah was based on contractual terms, and not exploitative taxation of a conquered people
View attachment 636699
Historian writing about the myth of "rape, pillage, forced conversion" blah blah. Arab Conquests didn't do any of those things...
View attachment 636700
Btw, Egypt was conquered in the 6th century by Amr Ibn Al Aas (companion of the Prophet PBUH), but it wasn't a majority Muslim country until the 10th-11th century. Showing that the 'Arabization' linked with Islam was a gradual, mostly consensual social process that took place over centuries, and not "forced" by sword and rape like it happened in Latin America