Four Iran border guards killed in clash on Pakistan frontier

[Max]

why can't they weed out these rats so they don't conduct these attacks?

We have killed Thousands of Afghan Indian funded/armed TTP and BLA separatists.. our main focus is on Afghan and Indian side.. If Iran have problem, we are ready to work..

Better you build fence and wall on 700 Km border.. we have no objection or border dispute, keeping it open for free movement of militants will harm our relationship..

 

[salarsikander]

Keep it on.

Reported for trolling and adding nothing valuable or meaningful to the post
@Oscar @waz

 

[Beny Karachun]

Reported for trolling and adding nothing valuable or meaningful to the post
@Oscar @waz

Trolling? yeah sure.
Both of you are our enemies, you can keep fighting.

 

[salarsikander]

Trolling? yeah sure.
Both of you are our enemies, you can keep fighting.

LOL. its not even border skirmish. so much for being delusional

 

[AmirPatriot]

Keep it on.

Terrorist sympathizer.

 

[B@KH]

Terrorism is now a Global issue and Pak alone cannot handle it.

IRAN and CHINA together needs to take on anti-Iran wahabi terrorists on Pak Iran Border once the gawadar port becomes operational and china establish its military bases. Few chinese military bases on Iran-Pak border will discourage the NATO led terrorists.

 

[AmirPatriot]

We have killed Thousands of Afghan Indian funded/armed TTP and BLA separatists.. our main focus is on Afghan and Indian side.. If Iran have problem, we are ready to work..

Better you build fence and wall on 700 Km border.. we have no objection or border dispute, keeping it open for free movement of militants will harm our relationship..

Iran has said countless times it is ready to work with Pakistan, so there is no issue there.

http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/06/20/471297/Iran-Pakistan-Zarif-Noor-Muhammad-Jadmani

http://www.presstv.ir/DetailFr/2016/03/25/457520/Iran-Pakistan-Rouhani-Sharif-Islamabad

Saying that we should build a 700 km wall is just fanciful, at least for the foreseeable future.

If Pakistan's attention is mostly diverted towards India or Afghanistan, then surely Iranian UCAVs attacking terrorists across the border should be seen as a helping hand? Why are some members here so hostile to such an action? Its not like we are Americans with vested interests - we have terrorism across the border constantly and there is only so much you can fight inside your own borders when the rats don't recognise borders. They have bases in Pakistan. The best way to fight these militants is to find where they are (intelligence) and kill their leaders and members (UCAVs, arrest and execution). If Pakistan is busy elsewhere, then Iran could lend a hand.

Terrorism is now a Global issue and Pak alone cannot handle it.

IRAN and CHINA together needs to take on anti-Iran wahabi terrorists on Pak Iran Border once the gawadar port becomes operational and china establish its military bases. Few chinese military bases on Iran-Pak border will discourage the NATO led terrorists.

Correct. Stability in the Balochistan area is in everyone's interest. Now, I don't know about Indian involvement in the region, but surely they will want security there now they are investing in Chahbahar, as does China in Gwadar, and obviously Iran and Pakistan.

 

[Drashid]

Keep it on.

Come on man, would you appreciate it if they said the same about IDF soldiers?

Iran has said countless times it is ready to work with Pakistan, so there is no issue there.

http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/06/20/471297/Iran-Pakistan-Zarif-Noor-Muhammad-Jadmani

http://www.presstv.ir/DetailFr/2016/03/25/457520/Iran-Pakistan-Rouhani-Sharif-Islamabad

Saying that we should build a 700 km wall is just fanciful, at least for the foreseeable future.

If Pakistan's attention is mostly diverted towards India or Afghanistan, then surely Iranian UCAVs attacking terrorists across the border should be seen as a helping hand? Why are some members here so hostile to such an action? Its not like we are Americans with vested interests - we have terrorism across the border constantly and there is only so much you can fight inside your own borders when the rats don't recognise borders. They have bases in Pakistan. The best way to fight these militants is to find where they are (intelligence) and kill their leaders and members (UCAVs, arrest and execution). If Pakistan is busy elsewhere, then Iran could lend a hand.



Correct. Stability in the Balochistan area is in everyone's interest. Now, I don't know about Indian involvement in the region, but surely they will want security there now they are investing in Chahbahar, as does China in Gwadar, and obviously Iran and Pakistan.

I would assume Pakistan is against this because it would ruin Pak-Arab relations.

 

[Max]

Iran has said countless times it is ready to work with Pakistan, so there is no issue there.

http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/06/20/471297/Iran-Pakistan-Zarif-Noor-Muhammad-Jadmani

http://www.presstv.ir/DetailFr/2016/03/25/457520/Iran-Pakistan-Rouhani-Sharif-Islamabad

Saying that we should build a 700 km wall is just fanciful, at least for the foreseeable future.

If Pakistan's attention is mostly diverted towards India or Afghanistan, then surely Iranian UCAVs attacking terrorists across the border should be seen as a helping hand? Why are some members here so hostile to such an action? Its not like we are Americans with vested interests - we have terrorism across the border constantly and there is only so much you can fight inside your own borders when the rats don't recognise borders. They have bases in Pakistan. The best way to fight these militants is to find where they are (intelligence) and kill their leaders and members (UCAVs, arrest and execution). If Pakistan is busy elsewhere, then Iran could lend a hand.



Correct. Stability in the Balochistan area is in everyone's interest. Now, I don't know about Indian involvement in the region, but surely they will want security there now they are investing in Chahbahar, as does China in Gwadar, and obviously Iran and Pakistan.

bomb them in Iran, Rigi brothers were not Pakistanis, they were Iranians? Jaish al adal is also Iranian.. Drone some of ur incompetent border guard who intentionally or unintentionally send militants to Pakistan, militants come back to Iran, hit the target and run back to Pakistan crossing Iranian border each time as if nothing happen..

2nd drone those bastard who are forcing them inside to take up arms by killing whole Baluch towns..

If you still want to drone us then allow us to send few f-16 to bomb Tehran too bcoz Mullah scums are funding political, religious and militants groups in Pakistan, making innocent Pakistani shia a complete terrorist in syrian and Iraqi proxy wars... deal my farsi brother, hope you would love PAF in Tehran... No?

We arrested a terrorist leader who was travelled from Iran to taftan border and his name was Abdus Salam Rigi, he travelled and crossed the Iranian border from official check post, no one stopped him in Iran.. Now here are some big mouth blaming thier shit on Pakistan.. Those bastards should question thier mullah why sistan is most backward?

 

[AmirPatriot]

I would assume Pakistan is against this because it would ruin Pak-Arab relations.

Against what? I mentioned a lot of different actions in my post.

bomb them in Iran, Rigi brothers were not Pakistanis, they were Iranians? Jaish al adal is also Iranian.. Drone some of ur incompetent border guard who intentionally or unintentionally send militants to Pakistan, militants come back to Iran, hit the target and run back to Pakistan crossing Iranian border each time as if nothing happen..

2nd drone those bastard who are forcing them inside to take up arms by killing whole Baluch towns..

If you still want to drone us then allow us to send few f-16 to bomb Tehran too bcoz Mullah scums are funding political, religious and militants groups in Pakistan, making innocent Pakistani shia a complete terrorist in syrian and Iraqi proxy wars... deal my farsi brother, hope you would love PAF in Tehran... No?

We arrested a terrorist leader who was travelled from Iran to taftan border and his name was Abdus Salam Rigi, he travelled and crossed the Iranian border from official check post, no one stopped him in Iran.. Now here are some big mouth blaming thier shit on Pakistan.. Those bastards should question thier mullah why sistan is most backward?

There was me thinking we were going to have a reasonable discussion... I guess not lol.

 

[Drashid]

Against what? I mentioned a lot of different actions in my post.

Against Iran and Pakistan cooperating at such a level. It will not only anger the Arabs, but also NATO. Pakistan's interests are to keep ties with Iran at a minimum.

 

[B@KH]

Iran has said countless times it is ready to work with Pakistan, so there is no issue there.
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/06/20/471297/Iran-Pakistan-Zarif-Noor-Muhammad-Jadmani
http://www.presstv.ir/DetailFr/2016/03/25/457520/Iran-Pakistan-Rouhani-Sharif-Islamabad
Saying that we should build a 700 km wall is just fanciful, at least for the foreseeable future.
If Pakistan's attention is mostly diverted towards India or Afghanistan, then surely Iranian UCAVs attacking terrorists across the border should be seen as a helping hand? Why are some members here so hostile to such an action? Its not like we are Americans with vested interests - we have terrorism across the border constantly and there is only so much you can fight inside your own borders when the rats don't recognise borders. They have bases in Pakistan. The best way to fight these militants is to find where they are (intelligence) and kill their leaders and members (UCAVs, arrest and execution). If Pakistan is busy elsewhere, then Iran could lend a hand.

Correct. Stability in the Balochistan area is in everyone's interest. Now, I don't know about Indian involvement in the region, but surely they will want security there now they are investing in Chahbahar, as does China in Gwadar, and obviously Iran and Pakistan.

if the ports are developed then the region too will develop and security too will be enhanced.
rest pak has leverage over india as india has no roots here except it exploit issues and with better and enhanced security it will not be a problem for pak. iran too needs to build new garrisions and enhance security at its borders.

Come on man, would you appreciate it if they said the same about IDF soldiers?
I would assume Pakistan is against this because it would ruin Pak-Arab relations.

well said. that is why only Iran-China can deal these anti-Iran wahabi terrorists and that is a also a good option.

 

[AmirPatriot]

Against Iran and Pakistan cooperating at such a level. It will not only anger the Arabs, but also NATO. Pakistan's interests are to keep ties with Iran at a minimum.

Pakistan's interests are also eliminating terrorism in Balochistan. They would rather allow terrorism in Balochistan than reduce ties with the Arabs and NATO?

 

[Max]

Against what? I mentioned a lot of different actions in my post.



There was me thinking we were going to have a reasonable discussion... I guess not lol.

talks of bombing our territory is reasonable but bombing champion of state sponor terrorism aka Mullahs is not.. Nice joke

we have saying in Urdu which mean "It takes two to make a quarrel"

why ur embassy people were roaming in Pakistan's prohibited area's without any permission from few days?

Why Iranian official are present in every shia political, religious meetings ln Pakistan? Why @B@KH like Iran worshipers are being produced?


cooperate with us, we will cooperate with you..

 

[Drashid]

Pakistan's interests are also eliminating terrorism in Balochistan. They would rather allow terrorism in Balochistan than reduce ties with the Arabs and NATO?

I would assume Pakistan is already trying to purge Baluchistan of militants then, as CPEC goes through there. Give it some time. Pakistan can surely do it themselves, getting Iranian help would make them look weak.