F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol, sure, you don't even know what type of damage explosive drone deal??what rubbish have you wrote did you even read it
lol, sure, you don't even know what type of damage explosive drone deal??
You damage something by explosion, if that thing was damaged or destroyed by said damage, you would have secondary, again, the method is loud, the result cannot be silent. Because it would be a kinetic attack
Do you understand how stupid it is to say you want to killed something with explosive without explosion, that's all that explosive does.
Dude, you lost the plot here.
Omg what a absolute bloody disaster those poor souls, NATO fighting Russia until last Ukrainian
How sad and simply sick
Not a single mine clearing vehicle in sight and no air cover
Russians rained hell down on them Lancet arrives at 0:45 and ATGM, mortars, mines and shells
Krab eats Lancet drone
Western fanboys be like
“oh but lancet cannot destroy armor it has only 3kg warhead “
“Oh but lancet need good luck”
“Oh but Lancet cannot damage armor”
Where is the "burning"? All i see is a small explosion - and then the video cuts out...
looks like it may have scratched the paint job a little and not much more...
There is a video from Iraq, Isis fired a Kornet (~4,5kg warhead) and it hit the left cheek from the front in an angle something around 30-40°, the most armored part of the whole Abrams tank. Or any other tank in the world! It penetrated first the whole turret armor and then the door to the ammo bunker, so the crew inside got burned to death.
View attachment 941681View attachment 941682View attachment 941683
Well, guess what happens, when the HEAT beam penetrates the ammo bunker door from the inside, thats the point here. You have burning ammo with a huge overpressure and a hole from this to the crew compartment. Plus all the effects from the Kornet HEAT beam itself and the penetrated main armor.Where is the proof that the crew inside was burned to death? It looks like blowout panels prevented a catastrophic explosion. The problem with YouTubers is that they can post edited contents and create whole stories from them.
You are a laughing stock. You don't even the know the most basic things about your own murican MBT or even the most basic things about every tank in the world: The turret cheeks are ALWAYS the most protected part. And then you start arguing and polluting this and other threads with huge amounts of garbage text. Every jhungary post the same story, the same behavrior pattern.Sure, explain to me how 3KG of PETN (which is considered the best explosive, which I doubt is what Lancet drone made of) of 8400 m/s detonation velocity and 1.76g/cm3 density can pack enough punch to defeat 900mm RHA armour. You aren't talking about projectile charge (like APFSDS round) nor tandem charge, you are talking about High Explosive warhead.
Go on, I am waiting.
It's your own god damn graph
View attachment 941694
Tell me, which area have more space you can put armour on? The circle in blue or the circle in red?
Everyone knows the top portion of the tank is less protected than the main chassis, because that's where the gun and all the equipment were, it would not have enough space to put armour in.
Beside, you still have not address any of the issue, how the crew escape if the tank was destroyed. Fire happened BEFORE the crew bailed. And how the tank manages to move after the fire? Both suggested the tank was not destroyed, I can't say for sure it is penetrated, but I doubt it actually was, because the commander will not be able to bail out post fire.
Well, guess what happens, when the HEAT beam penetrates the ammo bunker door from the inside, thats the point here. You have burning ammo with a huge overpressure and a hole from this to the crew compartment. Plus all the effects from the Kornet HEAT beam itself and the penetrated main armor.
The only way the crew could have survived this, is by not beeing inside the tank at all. Maybe this was the case, maybe, but this is not the archievement of the Abrams armor.
The video posted by jhungary is an another story, the Metis hits the ammo compartment from the side, so the blowout panels were able to work like intended.
to be fair the Bradley actually is a very good IFV probably the best In the World, in Iraq War it destroyed more Iraqi armour than the M1 Abrams and they lost only 3 units
just shy of 30 tons and with speeds of over 40mph this is a basically a taxi tank which can TOW tanks from range
it has tried to be replaced 2 times and US Army wouldn't have any other vehicle
working along with the Leopard 2A6 which has speed and manoeuvrability the combination of Leopard + Bradley = 2 very fast very heavily armoured vehicles
working in a 2:1 ratio they are ideal to perform armoured thrusts deep into enemy territory
however what West didnt realise is that Russia is not Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen
Russia is a top standing World power and has shown that overrated overpriced over engineered Western equipment is totally inadequate for a armoured warfare against a level foe
and as if that was not enough they are being destroyed in large numbers by Lancet drones costing $35,000
Russias must be laughing all the way to the bank, Bradley cost is $6 million Leopard $8 million