KAL-EL
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 7,311
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Could be finalland by the time the Ruskies finish with it.
Yeah.. yeah sure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be finalland by the time the Ruskies finish with it.
Only show of force.Russia is going to deploy nuclear weapons again near its borders touching Finland and Kaliningrad. Return of the cold war. That will have far reaching negative consequences for whole of Europe in the long term.
When you mess with an adversary who can reply in the same tone no one wins actually and both sides suffer.
US& NATO did a stupid mistake by messing in Ukraine .What they achieved is the return of the cold war. Same old nuclear holocaust fears, same old excess military spending etc.
Hope you aren't a closet Nazi?Yeah.. yeah sure.
Hope you aren't a closet Nazi?
I give a shit about conventional war capabilities, a NATO/Russia war would be nuclear, it's not conventional.You do know Finland, in term of both troop number and warfare experience are more or less only just behind the US right? Name a NATO country that have 200,000 active duty member ready to go and have 900,000 reserve trained up? Plus that is a big buffer between Russia and NATO, if NATO is to be hit, it would have been Finland first.
Adding Finland into NATO work on NATO favor, not the other way around, that is the exact reason why Finland did not join NATO before this Russian stunt.
Finland, Norway and Sweden are insignificant countries and their only importance is making up the numbers in NATO. These countries are feeling exceptionally vulnerable as Ukraine stands between them and Russia. If Ukraine collapses to Russian rule they will panic as they are aware the Russian juggernaut may trample them too. But even greater threat to European security is if China decides to fight NATO through the Russians by supplying huge quantity of lethal arms to the Russian-Ukraine war. That would be a disaster for the Europeans as it would extend and inflame the war even more and tilt the balance in favour of the Russians. Europe nd US would have to invest more resources to the conflict which would weaken their position on Taiwan and reduce the standard of living of their people as money is redirected to the war chests instead of social and health programs. Also India holds the key and both the West and India know it. That is why India is exploiting their position and trying to squeeze as much advantage and concessions as they can from the West. India has leveraged it's strength so much that they have installed their representatives within high ranks in the UK and US.I give a shit about conventional war capabilities, a NATO/Russia war would be nuclear, it's not conventional.
This is just a provocation and a diplomatic humiliation for Russia. West Europe is not more secure with Finland inside NATO.
The buffer was when Finland was non-NATO, and that's the reason Finland was not NATO member, because USA in the past had some respect for Russia and avoid a nuclear war, but since USA developed their ABM shields, they lost that respect, starting in the 2010s decade.
Now that Finland is NATO member, a misunderstood and a provocation between NATO and Russia is more easy and likely.
You have no idea, you are a fool not to understand the gravity of situation. Turning into a frontline against one of the most powerful countries in the world is not something to be happy about. USA will throw you under the bus when the time comes, even if your best friend, they love their own land more than yours.Seems to be common theme among pro-Russian people all over forums & social media. Most have abandoned whole "Russian conquers Europe with military" babbling and go straight to nuclear weapon babble.
First of all, If you talked nuclear war, then there are only 7 countries, NATO no NATO does not really matters.I give a shit about conventional war capabilities, a NATO/Russia war would be nuclear, it's not conventional.
This is just a provocation and a diplomatic humiliation for Russia. West Europe is not more secure with Finland inside NATO.
The buffer was when Finland was non-NATO, and that's the reason Finland was not NATO member, because USA in the past had some respect for Russia and avoid a nuclear war, but since USA developed their ABM shields, they lost that respect, starting in the 2010s decade.
Now that Finland is NATO member, a misunderstood and a provocation between NATO and Russia is more easy and likely.
It really depends.I disagree honestly, 200 tanks, 300IFVs and 1000 APCs is kinda underwhelming for the amount of soldiers they have. Israel got a similar amount of active and reserve soldiers and almost 10 times more tanks and APCs (We don't have IFVs unfortunately, yet), and that's not accounting equipment in storage.
I'm sure their training and gear are way better than the average mobilised Russian. Still, Finland's peacekeeping operations only amount to a few thousand soldiers operating, rarely ever getting into combat situations. That would be like saying Russia is combat experienced because of their operations in Syria. It's true about the guys that served in Syria, not the Russian army.
Russia definitely doesn't have the power to spare in order to fight Finland, but Finland is truly a nation whose doctrine is defensive in nature, their military structure shows it.
Poland is going for an offensive military, with crazy amount of K2 and M1A2 tanks, IFVs and artillery being bought. They'll have the strongest tank force in Europe by far by then.
Finland and Sweden ok, but Norway is another story.Finland, Norway and Sweden are insignificant countries and their only importance is making up the numbers in NATO. These countries are feeling exceptionally vulnerable as Ukraine stands between them and Russia. If Ukraine collapses to Russian rule they will panic as they are aware the Russian juggernaut may trample them too. But even greater threat to European security is if China decides to fight NATO through the Russians by supplying huge quantity of lethal arms to the Russian-Ukraine war. That would be a disaster for the Europeans as it would extend and inflame the war even more and tilt the balance in favour of the Russians. Europe nd US would have to invest more resources to the conflict which would weaken their position on Taiwan and reduce the standard of living of their people as money is redirected to the war chests instead of social and health programs. Also India holds the key and both the West and India know it. That is why India is exploiting their position and trying to squeeze as much advantage and concessions as they can from the West. India has leveraged it's strength so much that they have installed their representatives within high ranks in the UK and US.
I think Russian kind of knew the outcome of the war, Here me out before going to war every single possibility is played and researched, And Russia was kind of preparing for the war/invasion from 2013 i guess but recently NATO intervention gave him the reason to invade Ukraine.Massive developement.
The main purpose of Invading Ukarain was to kee NATO away from Russian border.
What will Russia do now?
Ok blue eyed boy of uncle Sam.Lol, it is Russia that started the war
How do you know he is blue eyed and a bastard of Uncle Sam?Ok blue eyed boy of uncle Sam.
Look like Russia can now nuke Finland