GriffinsRule
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
In PAF it was used for internal fuel.Side note: At least the Chinese Q5s had ONE single internal bay for carrying a single nuke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In PAF it was used for internal fuel.Side note: At least the Chinese Q5s had ONE single internal bay for carrying a single nuke.
Will disagree with your assessment, point defense fighter emerging out of ground clutter has 50% chance. Unless you are talking about Iraq vs USAF, which is not the case here. This is pretty much what Abhi was trying to do, but in the most stupid imaginable way.A F-7PG vs Tejas, Mig-29 or Mirage-2000 would be a turkey shoot (and not a turkey shoot in favor of F-7PG ).
If a point defense with F-7PG is worth performing or not; that depends on how many F-7PGs are PAF willing to lose on that day.
briefing between USA & IAF red flags officer on briefing was more concerned about mig21 bisons as compare to SU30MKi
Will disagree with your assessment, point defense fighter emerging out of ground clutter has 50% chance.
Finals samungli
No it was not.A 50% attrition rate means that all 46 of F-7PGs would be gone within a week of an all out war.
The BVR missiles which would be employed in next conflict involving South-East Asia would be more advanced than AIM-120 versions used by USAF in 2003.
.... and small F-7PG may be a nimble beast but I don't think PAF has ever tested it agianst an high-off boresight WVR missile with HMD assited launch.
I don't think so.Was this plane used in Operation Swift Retort?
F7 were not part of operations, but were up in air fields protecting important installation at that timeI don't think so.
The aircraft that took part was:
F16
Jf17
Mirage III
Mirage 5
Saab 2000 erieye
Falco DA20
No f7.