The article also states that Argentinean aircraft manufacturing facilities are far more advance than that of China and Pakistan hence they can develop a much more potent aircraft in the future. So far this is the most detailed article regarding the Argentinean procurement that has at least crossed my eyes. There are many things that have been highlighted out of which only one thing can be accepted to be true is that Argentina wants to own the JF-17 and develop it according to their own needs. China and Pakistan both have shown and optioned the JF-17 as tailored option for any air force that wishes to procure the aircraft. Hence repeatedly JF-17 has been highlighted with its design traits of being modular in design, easier to intergrade both hardware and software.
The question regarding integration of Israeli systems could be read in two ways. i.e
1) Just as comparison of the weapons China manufactures = any western manufacturer.
2) Procuring JF-17 frame and integrating a complete Israeli package. (Remember Kfir Block 60 was offered)
Not sure of how much similarity is there between Pakistani and Myanmar JF-17 as Pakistani JF-17 have a semi western package where as Myanmar has an all Chinese package. Same would be the case if Israeli package would be on board.
The only thing that comes to my mind is regarding design limitations and performance, however they might be different as well as the Engine would be different to that Pakistan uses.
Argentina and Israel Aerospace industries (IAI) have resumed negotiations for the latter’s Kfir Block-60 multi-role fighter
quwa.org
This would only be seen once the contract is made public or actual production of JF17 commences in Argentina. This could perhaps be the offsets offered.
Did inform earlier that the JF-17 deal is for 100 + aircraft.