What's new

Escort services thrive on social media

I don't know about West specifically, but globally it does seem they ('unaffiliated' - non-religious, atheist?) won't grow that much compared to others:

View attachment 467826

Edgy Atheism is on decline and wil decline to just 5% in 2050.



Not necessarily. Maybe its true for muslims but not for other religions.
It was almost zero a while back.
You are discounting China and the developed nations which are either atheist majority or moving in that direction .
 

Attachments

  • FT_15.12.17_religiousSalience.png
    FT_15.12.17_religiousSalience.png
    19.2 KB · Views: 27
Will you bring your family girls in your so called "very good service" ? Naujubillah:crazy:

There are many UGLY Bangladeshis on PDF.

The social values in BD has changed over last 10 years drastically, and bred many UGLY Bangladeshis.

UGLY ≠ How you look.

You two have now seen how morally repugnant a good number of BD members here are....saying incest between siblings is "ok" and all kind of disgusting crap.

They have stripped absolute morals for relative ones that they can now dictate/be dictated to on feelz....thus they become mindless sheep, sycophant complex for who carries the biggest stick (and generally those are the most immoral kind of people too).
 
You two have now seen how morally repugnant a good number of BD members here are....saying incest between siblings is "ok" and all kind of disgusting crap.

They have stripped absolute morals for relative ones that they can now dictate/be dictated to on feelz....thus they become mindless sheep, sycophant complex for who carries the biggest stick (and generally those are the most immoral kind of people too).
But his post and what you posted are based on your own feelz too.
 
But his post and what you posted are based on your own feelz too.

When was the last time that promoting sibling-buggering as "OK" lead to the building of civilisation rather than its deterioration?

There is a large body of evidence as to what historically works for the larger psyche of human society...and what creates its downfall. Past the intuitive essence that ought to be there in a moral being....promoting heavy materialism, ego and capricious vice (feelz for immediate self-centred fulfillment, regardless of its larger effect) leads to one clear thing in Human society (and if its not apparent, it should be clearly read up on at least)...compared to the drive for larger truths through personal sacrifice, self-control and ability to understand a larger responsibility (feelz regarding absolute moral framework being instrumental to having inalienable rights, freedoms and existence in the first place).

Humans creating their own fickle standards, based on their own feelz at the moment, open to control and exploitation by other immoral beings simple crushes humanity itself in the end. It always has been and always will be an entropy accelerant.....because the vast majority of exchanges between good/bad and leader/follower are not reversible processes.....but those that benefit from society's degradation would have you believe just that (or that there is no such delineation to begin with) and enough people are both stupid and gullible enough for it to be a potent force.

@Desert Fox @Psychic
 
When was the last time that promoting sibling-buggering as "OK" lead to the building of civilisation rather than its deterioration?

There is a large body of evidence as to what historically works for the larger psyche of human society...and what creates its downfall. Past the intuitive essence that ought to be there in a moral being....promoting heavy materialism, ego and capricious vice (feelz for immediate self-centred fulfillment, regardless of its larger effect) leads to one clear thing in Human society (and if its not apparent, it should be clearly read up on at least)...compared to the drive for larger truths through personal sacrifice, self-control and ability to understand a larger responsibility (feelz regarding absolute moral framework being instrumental to having inalienable rights, freedoms and existence in the first place).

Humans creating their own fickle standards, based on their own feelz at the moment, open to control and exploitation by other immoral beings simple crushes humanity itself in the end. It always has been and always will be an entropy accelerant.....because the vast majority of exchanges between good/bad and leader/follower are not reversible processes.....but those that benefit from society's degradation would have you believe just that (or that there is no such delineation to begin with) and enough people are both stupid and gullible enough for it to be a potent force.

@Desert Fox @Psychic[/QUOTE
The concept was in support of civil rights not feel. Again what You're typing is also based on what are your feels of today and of the past. I admit I'm more conservative to the others and I prefer that incestual relations should be illegal. Albeit I do so of my own feelz given that I view such an act as disgusting. My morals are against it as a result of my own feelz.
 
Last edited:
When was the last time that promoting sibling-buggering as "OK" lead to the building of civilisation rather than its deterioration?

There is a large body of evidence as to what historically works for the larger psyche of human society...and what creates its downfall. Past the intuitive essence that ought to be there in a moral being....promoting heavy materialism, ego and capricious vice (feelz for immediate self-centred fulfillment, regardless of its larger effect) leads to one clear thing in Human society (and if its not apparent, it should be clearly read up on at least)...compared to the drive for larger truths through personal sacrifice, self-control and ability to understand a larger responsibility (feelz regarding absolute moral framework being instrumental to having inalienable rights, freedoms and existence in the first place).

Humans creating their own fickle standards, based on their own feelz at the moment, open to control and exploitation by other immoral beings simple crushes humanity itself in the end. It always has been and always will be an entropy accelerant.....because the vast majority of exchanges between good/bad and leader/follower are not reversible processes.....but those that benefit from society's degradation would have you believe just that (or that there is no such delineation to begin with) and enough people are both stupid and gullible enough for it to be a potent force.

@Desert Fox @Psychic
Well said man.

And for those accusing your post as based on your personal feelings are mistaken. What you said there is historically proven to be true, and history is based on nobody's "feelz".

History repeats itself.
 
The concept was in support of civil rights not feel. Again what You're typing is also based on what are your feels of today and of the past. I admit I'm more conservative to the others and I prefer that incestual relations should be illegal. Albeit I do so of my own feelz given that I view such an act as disgusting. My morals are against it as a result of my own feelz.

This is more of a fireside chat to have over some scotch.....nothing productive to be said anymore here online.
 
Retarded argument. As long as the girl is adult, she can decide for herself. Not sure why people bring up families as if that's a counter argument. That adult "girl" doesn't need her family to take them to the service.
You can be a characterless I don't care , But no where in the world support prostitution and its illegal most of the countries . In public if I ask you the same question and your statement will be complete opposite I know .Supporting prostitution is not a good idea but you can be infected by tons of stds .So its you who is the retard

You look very confident!

If you do not care about the values your family taught you until 18 years, then why would there be any concept of family in the first place?

why would your parents brought up you and invest on you until 18 years, if you disregard the moral and values they taught to you?

And if you do not care about the values of family, then why would incest not be deemed as right to do?
He is just a characterless and think he is smart.

You two have now seen how morally repugnant a good number of BD members here are....saying incest between siblings is "ok" and all kind of disgusting crap.

They have stripped absolute morals for relative ones that they can now dictate/be dictated to on feelz....thus they become mindless sheep, sycophant complex for who carries the biggest stick (and generally those are the most immoral kind of people too).
I value my religious and moral prospect .It is you who bring incest and garbage things which sleep in your dirty mind.I am strongly against any kind of immoral sexual behavior .
 
You can be a characterless I don't care , But no where in the world support prostitution and its illegal most of the countries . In public if I ask you the same question and your statement will be complete opposite I know .Supporting prostitution is not a good idea but you can be infected by tons of stds .So its you who is the retard
I wonder if your public support extend everywhere. Should muslims be killed in Myanmar if majority public says yes? Should muslims be killed in India for beef eating if majority supports it? What does majority having certain opinion has anything to do with what should and shouldn't be legal? If you need majority opinion to decide something on legality then it just means you don't have any thought of your own, you are like a sheep in herd, whatever the herd decides, you follow them and think it's right just because majority says it.
I value my religious and moral prospect .It is you who bring incest and garbage things which sleep in your dirty mind.I am strongly against any kind of immoral sexual behavior .
Did I say anywhere that those who don't want to be prostitutes should be forced into prostitution? Whoever like you don't like it, don't become one. No one is forcing you too. On the other hand YOU WANT TO FORCE other people from not doing it because YOU PERSONALLY don't like it. It should be up to their own mind as far as legality goes. What you personally don't like, shouldn't be the deciding factor of if others can do it. I don't smoke or eat veggies, doesn't mean I am going to ban it for everyone who does.
 
You can be a characterless I don't care , But no where in the world support prostitution and its illegal most of the countries . In public if I ask you the same question and your statement will be complete opposite I know .Supporting prostitution is not a good idea but you can be infected by tons of stds .So its you who is the retard


He is just a characterless and think he is smart.


I value my religious and moral prospect .It is you who bring incest and garbage things which sleep in your dirty mind.I am strongly against any kind of immoral sexual behavior .
Don't force your moral/values/beliefs on others. Let others have their own values.

If you are against prostitution then fine. No one is forcing you to whore yourself out(at least I hope so). And no one is forcing you to visit brothels either. Those who indulge in prostitution and those who frequent brothels, leave them be.
 
Don't force your moral/values/beliefs on others. Let others have their own values.

If you are against prostitution then fine. No one is forcing you to whore yourself out(at least I hope so). And no one is forcing you to visit brothels either. Those who indulge in prostitution and those who frequent brothels, leave them be.
I
Don't force your moral/values/beliefs on others. Let others have their own values.

If you are against prostitution then fine. No one is forcing you to whore yourself out(at least I hope so). And no one is forcing you to visit brothels either. Those who indulge in prostitution and those who frequent brothels, leave them be.
Carry on.
 
Don't force your moral/values/beliefs on others.

And what if their moral values say murder is ok...but mine say's its not? I have no right to impose my moral values on them?

Why have a common body of laws (with enforcement <---notice how force is in that word) for more than the individual in the first place actually? At every level you are imposing on some non-zero number of people if you do so right?

@Desert Fox @Psychic @Skies
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom