And just as reference, here is where Pakistan is :
Raising awareness which was the job of the govt :
Zubair, M. and
Garforth, C. (
2006)
Farm level tree planting in Pakistan: The role of farmers' perceptions and attitudes. Agroforestry Systems, 66 (3). pp. 217-229. ISSN 0167-4366
Farm level tree planting in Pakistan: The role of farmers' perceptions and attitudes
The low proportion of forested land and continuing degradation of existing forest cover are serious threats to the sustainability of forestry in Pakistan. Farm forestry has been identified as a feasible solution, particularly in the plain areas. Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour in a
survey of 124 farmers in Dera Ismail Khan district of Pakistan's North West Frontier Province showed that farmers' willingness to grow trees on their farms is a function of their attitudes towards the advantages and disadvantages of growing trees, their perception of the opinions of salient referents and factors that encourage and discourage farm level tree planting. Farmers viewed
farm forestry as economically beneficial and environmentally friendly. Tree planting was perceived as
increasing income, providing wood for fuel and furniture, controlling erosion and pollution and providing shade for humans and animals. Farmers saw
hindrance in agricultural operations and the harbouring of insects, pests and diseases as negative impacts of tree planting; however, these were outweighed by their perceptions of positive impacts. Tree
growing decisions of farmers were influenced by the opinions of family members, owners/tenants, fellow farmers and village elders. The factors that significantly predicted farm level tree planting wer
e availability of barren land, lack of markets, lack of nurseries and damage caused by animals and humans. Farm forestry programmes are more likely to be successful
if they acknowledge and address the factors which underlie farmers' reasons for planting or not planting trees.
http://www.cinram.umn.edu/sites/cinram.umn.edu/files/zubair.pdf
Yet govt from 2006 until the current govt gave no interest in this! This is esp advantageous for Sindh and Punjb but seems like ministers in neither province are educated and thus cant be bothered to pick up an already conducted survey!
Tree planting in Pakistan:
16 July
2009
Lahore, Pakistan - Pakistan set the Guinness World Record for tree planting, beating India in a healthy and productive international competition contributing to preserving fragile and endangered forests.
With
541,176 young mangroves trees planted by 300 volunteers from the local fishermen communities just in one day, the country broke the previous 447,874 record held by historical rival India.
http://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?170461/WWF-rewards-Pakistan-for-tree-planting-world-record
Yup the swamps you were worried about....is being rewarded by WWF...
Then in 2013 more swamps:
By planting 750,000 mangroves, Pakistan claims new world record
KARACHI:
The provincial forest department set a new world record on Saturday by planting 750,000 mangrove saplings at Kharo Chan, Thatta, in a little over 12 hours. This is the highest number of saplings planted within a day.
.
.
.
.
“In 2009, the department had set a record by planting 541,176 saplings at Keti Bundar. This record was toppled later that year by India. Our efforts are an attempt to regain the title.”
.
.
.
.
.
The world record isn’t the only reason the feat is something to rejoice about: mangrove forests along Sindh’s coastal belt have been vanishing rapidly. Residents of coastal communities have pointed their fingers at the land and timber mafias, who they claim are hacking away at the trees. According to IUCN officials, mangroves forests sprawled out over 600,000 hectares back in the 1930s. But by 2005, the figure had plummeted to around 96,000 hectares.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/567023/by-planting-750000-mangroves-pakistan-claims-new-world-record/
Raising awareness:
29 May 2012
Tree planting helps Pakistani farmers weather floods
KHAIRPUR MIR’S, Pakistan (AlertNet) - Abdul Qadir Shah, a cotton farmer in Pakistan’s southern Sindh province, has been able to spring back from the destructive floods of the past two years thanks to his decision to plant mango, date and neem trees on his 14-acre plot.
When floodwaters hit Khairpur Mir’s district, some 400 miles (644 km) northeast of Karachi, in 2010 and then again in 2011, Qadir Shah suffered financial losses of 4 million rupees ($44,000) as his cotton crop was ruined.
“But income from mango and date palm trees, which I had planted some four years earlier in my cotton field and on the edges of nearby irrigation waterways, provided enough money to let me repair damaged water channels, buy cotton seed, farm tools and pesticides, and other inputs for cultivating my farmland again this year,” he explained
http://news.trust.org//item/?map=tree-planting-helps-pakistani-farmers-weather-floods
This mind you was supposed to be done by the extension studies dept of universities and dept of forestry who have special people hired since 1950s to go talk to the farmers and educate them of how to minimize loss! I see most of the officers are as good as dead!
Green Pakistan by Plant a Tree & Install FES Stove
by Association for Humanitarian Development (AHD)
https://www.globalgiving.org/projects/rural-women-empowerment-in-pakistan/updates/
Wind, Solar, LNG, Biomass, Geothermal. Is that less efficient ? Isn't this what ruling party is working on ? How about learn what Europe has been able to do
Ruling party is an old dog which cant learn new tricks we have seen it time and again!
WHAT exactly is it doing it managed to by LNG more expensive when prices were at its low...Biomass isnt even addressed!
Solar park- boasted to be the worlds largest seems to be another lie 2 other countries have already claimed that they will build worlds largest even before Pakistan's one is complete! And lets not even go in the calculated cost vs reality!
The problem with the ruling party is - instead of seeing themselves as civilian slaves to serve they think of themselves as rulers!
Most of it is. Baluchistan, Sind, and Punjab are 70% of Pakistan
And Baluchistan has more forest than it is credited for! Sindh and Punjab have destroyed most of theirs but as the stuff I have posted in the post before this one....People can still repair- Just depends how interested are the uneducated ministers!
Ever given a thought what techniques IVC used ? Certainly there were no dams ! And mind you they were not in Central Punjab, where today most of the agriculture is.
1) I didnt say they had dams- maybe derivatives of it....Not much is known about the details...
2) Why did I bring in IVC- its irrigation system was complex for its time: Instead of building canals, Indus civilization people may have built
water diversion schemes, which, like terrace agriculture, can be elaborated by generations of small-scale labor investments.
Indus civilization people practiced
rainfall harvesting, a powerful technology that was brought to fruition by classical Indian civilization but
nearly forgotten in the twentieth century.
At a recently discovered Indus civilization city in western
India,
archaeologists discovered a series of massive reservoirs, hewn from solid rock and designed to collect rainfall, that would have been capable of meeting the city's needs during the dry season.
3) In 2600 B.C.E., the Indus Valley was verdant, forested, and teeming with wildlife. It was wetter, too; floods were a problem and appear, on more than one occasion, to have overwhelmed certain settlements.
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Indus_Valley_Civilization
So you claiming we were deserts historically is kind of wrong!
And if our unpar govt still cant learn from modern techniques they should hang their heads in shame coz even in Mesopotamia they had some dam like structures
IVC had town planning - canals to allow draining out of flood water- something a our metro didnt have! Shocke that people living in BC planned and were more visionary than those living in 2000s!!
Soil is everything and PTI is putting stuff not native to this land !
Not native to the land? What is native to the land?