And do tell me which part of Pakistan didnt get flooded? It is less to do with trees and more to do with lack of long term planning ESP
lack of dams to control the water ...who do we have to thank for that?
Anything against nature is itself poor planning.
Its silly to spend tens of billions of dollars on something like dams which are not sustainable
First, you have to evacuate populations of towns and villages and cut thousands of trees.
Second, create artificial valleys but thats not always successful. In Pakistan, majority are built on earthquake fault lines and in the future, if a natural disaster were to strike, the damage could be catastrophic.
Third, concrete is used to channel and store water. If you did not know already, it has a life and requires regular maintenance and costs and the nature of material is such that large amount of water gets evaporated by heat and sunlight
Last but certainly not the least, it is often said they are needed because of energy requirements, however, facts will tell you the amount of money spent on this project could instead be used to give every house hold a solar panel which has no operational costs.
* Other than developing countries, no one else is building dams. North America and Europe built them in the 60s and today the the reality is they admit it has become a danger to them and costly to maintain.
* Sometimes the simple things are the solutions
Have a look at what desert countries like Saudi Arabia and Israel are able to do.
http://www.akdn.org/architecture/project.asp?id=2258
http://www.timesofisrael.com/how-israel-became-a-water-superpower/
Thank who ? Its people like you who are to blame. If people had slight knowledge and interest in actually developing the country and debating pros and cons, things would have been a lot different. If there is no chance of Kalabagh dam being built due to political pressures leading to ethnic pressures, people should have fcking moved on 30 years ago and found other ideas.