Armstrong
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 19,390
- Reaction score
- 94
- Country
- Location
The name of person in my dp is premchand dogra/degra
I don't like Dogras !
@SarthakGanguly - Oi tu Dogra tou nahin ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The name of person in my dp is premchand dogra/degra
I dont know you are getting confused..... Your points were:
1) In Kashmir, majority (muslims) won't accept Hindu CM as its the psych and mindset of Indian people...
2) BJP won because of its Hardline stand and polarised Hindus.
I am rebutting it by saying
1) Today Indian voter mindset is slowly but steadily changing (even Muslims and Kashmiris) as evident thaat BJP won 11-2% of Muslim votes which was earlier unthinkable.
2) I said as per your logic, Marathis would have elected a MARATHI party not a north Indian party like BJP , then again I said as per your logic even if all were hindutwavaadis, why did the marathis vote for BJP and not Sena as Sena is infact more Hindu than BJP?
While that is true, it depends on the inhibitions being put forward. That somehow Muslims in Kashmir will suffer under a Hindu BJP CM. This has political misconstruing at its core, but there is historical precedent for it.. and at the same time against it.
The Indian state under the Raj and after it has had some non-muslim leadership in smaller positions who played instrumental roles in providing betterment to the Muslim communities..
At the same time there are clear historical examples where Hindus(and Muslims in a vice-versa example) in positions of power have played a biased role against the Majority or minority Muslim population. It is then therefore usually best to take a leader from the major section of the community at the top and then intersperse it with those from the minority communities in the positions directly beneath them... or as the other alternative.. appoint a Hindu CM but ensure that the majority of his staff and cabinet are Muslim and hence help keep his decisions balanced.
Removal of 370 means ban on owning property in kashmir for non kashmiris will be lifted,,mass migration of others,,kashmiris fear it will lead to their dilution.
it wont be lifted....it'll be perceived as further cultural invasion by indian and will most likely be resisted - given the current ground realities and the rife anti-indian sentiment that exists (not just in the valley)
it wont be lifted....it'll be perceived as further cultural invasion by indian and will most likely be resisted - given the current ground realities and the rife anti-indian sentiment that exists (not just in the valley)
What are you talking about.? Many in valley don't like india, and many like india, its easy to migrate "INDIANS" to kashmir in prtext of being pandits or kashmiris.. If we are really evill. we could have done that. So first define what is evil.. and understand what an evil force can do to the maximum. and evaluate what that evil force are doing now... !!!
Well voting rights to migrated Kashmiri Pandits already given by current government (not sure about that) and article 370 is just matter of time. If BJP come to power in J&K then no one can save article 370.
You know cheraman the hindu king who provided sanctuary for muslim preachers and gave his own "HINDU" land to setup the "FIRST" muslim mosque in india. That is a hindu bro.. a hindu can be a muslim, christian or a hindu.... as long as tthey don't propogate idiocy.
BJP is trying to win as much states it can be coz state representation is there in rajya sabha. .Every 3 years new members elected in rajya sabha (1/3rd)..so by the end of modi term he may enough numbers to repel art 370.
Kashmir is Muslim majority.
Moreover - it's not an "indian state"...if it were, you wouldnt have more occupation soldiers imposing will through the barrel of the gun - more occupation soldiers than citizens/residents...latter who time and time again have rejected and rebelled
wonder what these same BJP types would say about when Afzal Guru was murdered judicially by the occupying entity......a good % of Kashmir (not just the restive valley or Azad Kashmir) shuttered down shops and protested quite angrily. He spoke for Kashmiri freedom and was silenced for it. Then again, same happens to the seperatist leaders. india's "democracy" doesnt apply in those lands and we can see why
That may be the utopian concept, but it has little effect on the reality of Indian politics as it seems or communal tensions.