Does Britain really need the military?

[John Reese]

Says who ? LOL have you ever been to Uk for that matter ?
In fact I am I feel very good watching Indians doing great, They are quite humble the NRI as opposed to the ones who have never been out of Indian borders.
You were the one claiming it as such chupa powa indian

Indian NRi are cool And vibrant community Unlike Pakistani Who reserve and Packed Community And Wannabe indians

Why Do i go to UK though My Only European visit Was Amsterdam that official visit

The UK will be more powerful than India for some time. Indian nukes are yet to have the range to hit the UK, but the same cannot be said for British nukes.

Say Who do you Know Range Agni-5 it 8000 that's Enough For UK

Why We need Distance When We have SLBM with Nuclear Sub in our Inventory

 

[salarsikander]

Indian NRi are cool And vibrant community Unlike Pakistani Who reserve and Packed Community And Wannabe indians

@I S I is it true ? Would you call yourself as an Indian or swine ?

 

[Hamza913]

Why you people claim falklands?

Look where is britain and where is falklands and Gibraltar.

Irish and Islamists are not going to attack with advanced fighter jets and submarines.

The majority of the Falklands prefer the UK, so they belong to the UK. End of story. Same with Gibraltar.

You never know about the Irish, the UK removing it's military would most likely make them attack again. Same for Arab militants.

 

[John Reese]

@ISI. is ir true ? Would you call yourself as an Indian or swine ?

 

[salarsikander]

Whatr a shameful Indian you are. the guys is trying to escape the wrath of animals by calling himself indian not out of how own free will ! By the way we were talking in the context of West

 

[John Reese]

Whatr a shameful Indian you are. the guys is trying to escape the wrath of animals by calling himself indian not out of how own free will ! By the way we were talking in the context of West

 

[salarsikander]

Where's the source

@I S I check post #77 and answer me

 

[John Reese]

Where's the source

@I S I check post #77 and answer me

here she the self confession of lady

 

[Hamza913]

Say Who do you Know Range Agni-5 it 8000 that's Enough For UK

Why We need Distance When We have SLBM with Nuclear Sub in our Inventory

Only when Agni six comes around will you be able to hit the UK.

As for nuclear subs, Britain has better ones.

 

[salarsikander]

here she the self confession of lady

To avoid discrimination and yet low life like you is making deal out of it. How sad

 

[John Reese]

Only when Agni six comes around will you be able to hit the UK.

As for nuclear subs, Britain has better ones.

Pure bs Agni 5 can go beyond 5500 Km is minimum range
According to DRDO chief, the exact range of Agni V is "classified" or "understated"

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/243544/agni-v-can-launch-mini.html

http://articles.economictimes.india...387066_1_nato-india-and-china-space-programme

Tell these to chinese think tank that why its icbm
China accuses India of undermining Agni-V missile capabilities

Source :
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahom...gni-V-missile-capabilities.html#ixzz4Il7O25HT

Read Chinese Think tank report
http://www.icsin.org/publications/chinese-reactions-to-indias-agni-v-test-firing

Child we can convert PSLV into an ICBM ant time do you even know history of ICBm's how they are developed in Cold war

 

[waz]

So is The middle East , US and other European countries

May be.you say that there Britain has many population of Indias and Pakistan because we once colony of British

There nothing special there many India Firms who gives jobs to thousand of UK citizens

Sir,after reading bit of history
I have exactly idea about British and US relationship

Until Late 1800's UK never given recognition to USA

For example helping confiderate states of America are only given more support to this policy

After rise German Empire in eary 19th century

UK realise that they need a stronger partner much stronger terms resources and military than gentle French

So they changed their policy to suite USA
After 1st war British cement this equation more with USA which are made on mutual
Interest but somewhere there society's still think US as there old colonial state

Terms like cowboys and Yankees are British proper british slang

After rise of NAZI Germany its clear that only hope to safe Britain was US
Though Hitler has no plan to take on US another major world force when they taking soviet

It was British which persuade them of old English lineages but as normal state policies US only makes it move if it has its own self interest in it
After ww2 and mighty British Empire fallen
It's clear to UK that to make any relevance in post war era against mighty opposition's like soviet they will have to swallow there British Raj legacy and take USA as there sole protector

You can still feel this difference when you talk to any families which belong to old british Lords
They still has that selfpride and elite Ness in them against their old British Raj and US or 14 colonies

Sir,I say it's partnership formed by mutual interest not any bond of sharing same Caucasian DNA

Thanks for the response. The UK and the US have a shared vision, look at NATO. The UK has firmly backed the US in troubled times e.g. 9/11. We share long cultural and historical ties as well.

 

[waz]

Why you people claim falklands?

Look where is britain and where is falklands and Gibraltar.

Irish and Islamists are not going to attack with advanced fighter jets and submarines.

The Falklands belong to the UK and will be with us forever, hopefully. The people there are British. Argentina has no claim over the islands, as the people of Argentina are not even natives themselves, they are all of European stock. You should read about what happened to the natives of Argentina. They have no right to an island which was first settled by British people 200 years ago. The French were also there but they left.

 

[Srinivas]

The Falklands belong to the UK and will be with us forever, hopefully. The people there are British. Argentina has no claim over the islands, as the people of Argentina are not even natives themselves, they are all of European stock. You should read about what happened to the natives of Argentina. They have no right to an island which was first settled by British people 200 years ago. The French were also there but they left.

Most of the Islands are cleared by colonials which were inhibited by native tribes. You can check about the native tribes of Fuegians and Patagonia. Just like what happened to Diego Garcia Island and the native tribes who inhibited it.

Britain wanted strategic Islands in all corners of the world they cleared them by doing genocide, implanted false history and started administering them.

They say Columbus discovered America, and people know this is a lie and Native Americans inhibited those lands and they have a civilization.

History we read is in the point of view of Europeans which undermines the achievements of Native people and their civilization.

English people has no business in those Islands, they have the strength and they did the genocides and they are claiming them.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Seriously?? Who is comparing Britains military technology and capabilities to India's??
Some people are really funny/delusional on this PDF. No comment.