@niaz sb, please correct my record as I remember being taught in school that there were 600 tanks on attack while the article suggests there were only 230?
Honourable Canuck786,
My post was in response to your statement:
“When India attacked Chawinda with 600 tanks we only needed a few good men to tackle it. Similarly if our backs were to be against the wall, we would again need a few more good men and blessings of Allah to come out of it Insha Allah!”
Since this is a scholarly column my post was meant to point out that Pakistan defenders even though outnumbered were more than a “ few good men” as you put it. Secondly, the Indian force launching that attack had only one armored division and a single armored division has about 300 tanks, certainly not 600.
I was in the UK as a young student when the war started and used to go to Pakistan High Commission at the Lowndes Square to read the latest newspapers and get the latest news. Most of the Pakistani students were keenly following the events as it was the first full-scale all-out war between India & Pakistan, I still vividly remember the happening of 1965 war.
If there is any retired officer of Pak Army who actually participated in the 65 war and is a member of PDF forum, he would probably know the first-hand account; according to best of my info the main attacking force was the Indian Army Ist Corps which consisted of one armored division (1st Arm’d) and two infantry divisions ((14th Div. & 26th) and one Mountain Div. (6th Mountain) making 4 divisions in total. Indian forces at the Sialkot sector were commanded by Lt. Gen P.O. Dunn. Maj.Gen. Rajinder Singh Sparrow commanded the Ist Armoured Div. (Black Elephant)
The defending force on Pakistani side consisted of one armored division (6th Arm’d) and one infantry division (15th Infantry). GOC of 6th Armoured was Maj. Gen. Abrar Hussein with Gen. Tikka Khan (then Major General) commanding the Infantry. Pakistani formations were part of Ist Corps commanded by Lt Gen Bakhtiar Rana based at Lahore.
Undoubtedly the Pak Army even though outnumbered fought very well. However, I am sure you are aware that propaganda plays a big part in the war and to keep up the morale of the nation, enemy strength is often exaggerated.
I quoted the passage from the war history site in my post. I remember reading the account battle of Chowinda in the Defence Journal as well but it didn’t mention the exact number of tanks employed by either side. Thus I am unable to vouch for the veracity neither of the article you referred to nor in a position to disprove it.