What's new

Do you want the military to takeover in Pakistan?

Do you want to see another military takeover in Pakistan?


  • Total voters
    95
It is the job of politicians and professionals

Military should only be engaged to safeguard border
Politicians in this country, are frauds, croupters , killers & incompetent, under-educated, pice to garbage?
They can't solve a simple mathametical equation, how can they can solve the problems of a country?

They military-ruler usually builds a political party after he takes over. For example, during General (retired) Pervez Musharraf's military-rule his political party was called Pakistan Muslim League Qaid (PML-Q).

The party still exist and currently holds 2 seats in the National Assembly.

Pakistan Muslim League (Q) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Then why he is having his own different party, APML?
Lies never lasts?
 
.
Politicians in this country, are frauds, croupters , killers & incompetent, under-educated, pice to garbage?
They can't solve a simple mathametical equation, how can they can solve the problems of a country?

Oh my...
something senseful out of you finally.
Respect for that comment!
 
.
Oh my...
something senseful out of you finally.
Respect for that comment!
Friend?
Sory, if went wrong, but it's me, but what can you do, when our over educated, hero's on the fourm, starts advocating Damocrazy not the real democracy?
Then , batmannow has to give them , what they deserved?
 
. . .
Sorry no military-
It's not the dam election, or refer n dum, the kid went to far, it's not in his hands or some 1 else, if politicians have proved themselves stupids, then state has to good bye to them, it's the reality?
 
.
How about having a stable democracy instead of doing the same thing over and over and over again?

Its like banging your head on a concrete wall to see if it hurts and bleeds. Pakistanis have been doing the same for 60+ years. Anyway I don't think Army is in any mood to take over Pakistan. They will sit behind. If any party goes over board on harming Pakistan they will be given warnings behind the scenes.
 
.
Weakest democracy is better then strongest dictatorship. So in my view democracy should prevail

I voted "no" even though the economic and human capital development during the last military rule was far more better than all the democratic governments we had combined.

But as per you even if it be on the account of the common man and the nation? no security, no growth, no development, no education, but still we should support democracy, right?

Remember, government is not something "one size fits all". Democracy is not the only form of government that can give good results. It all depends on the condition and ground reality and requirements of each country.

I am with any government be it military or one party rule or dictatorship or bipartisan. Important thing is which ever develops the nation more and uses the resources and human capital more efficiently, i am with it.

It is the job of politicians and professionals

Military should only be engaged to safeguard border

Let the protests bring some result and there be election reforms before next elections whenever they be, be it next month or after 1 year or 4 years or 10 years.
 
Last edited:
.
Right Now...I want IMRAN KHAN as PRIME MINISTER...................................NO COMPROMISE
anyone ...who gets in our way.....will be CRUSHED by OUR PUBLIC.............NO COMPROMISE
 
.
Military Rule in Pakistan

The Five Military Rulers (1956-2008)

Iskander Mirza (March 23, 1956–October 27, 1958): 948 Days
Ayub Khan (October 27, 1958-March 25, 1969): 3,802 Days
Ceded Shaksgam Valley to China in 1963.
Yahya Khan (March 25, 1969-December 20, 1971): 1,000 Days
Surrendered East Pakistan to India in 1971.
Zia-ul-Haq (July 5, 1977-August 17, 1988): 4,061 Days
Lost Siachin Glacier to India in 1984.
Pervez Musharraf (October 12, 1999-August 18, 2008): 3,233 Days
Surrendered Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) to United States in 2004.

Days since independence (22-08-2014): 24,480
Days under military rule: 13,044
Days under democratic rule (22-08-2014): 11,436

Democratic rule in Pakistan can only surpass military rule on January 17, 2019 under the current status quo.
F
 
. .
For the prevailing conditions in Pakistan it is necessary for military to take over to save Pakistan from becoming Iraq and Syria.You can see the protest launched by sipa-e-Sahaba yesterday under the influence from Nawaz sharif can turn in to deobandi-shia or deobandi-barelvi clash and this will result in to the break down of our sacred Pakistan.The yesterday protest clearly shows that nawaz sharif can go to any extent to save his power and he has no care for Pakistan survival .I think military take over is a last resort to save the country as cia; mosad and raw are planning to disintegrate Pakistan through sectarian war just like Syria and Iraq the current senario clearly shows this.I request Gen Raheel Sharif to take over the country in order to save it and donot care for constitution and judiciary as first of all state is important .If state collapse then there will be no benefit of constitution and judiciary
 
.
Days since independence (22-08-2014): 24,480
Days under military rule: 13,044
Days under democratic rule (22-08-2014): 11,436




Ama ya to 100 jute kha lo ya so pyaz ! dono mat khao !
 
.
A system should be maintained forever, musical chair will only bring Pakistan to stone age, like it is been happening for sometime.

The Marshal Law is likely to give another excuse to corrupt politicians, and corrupt system.
 
.
A system should be maintained forever, musical chair will only bring Pakistan to stone age, like it is been happening for sometime.

The Marshal Law is likely to give another excuse to corrupt politicians, and corrupt system.
All will be hanged to make an example , no one can do any crouption in politics in future!
It's coming!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom