DNA of Indonesian/Chinese/Japanese/Northen Indian/Southern Indian/Bengali and others

[Maira La]

Dravidan is old human ethnicities, we can see from human migration root and also their skin tone, so it is still possible some of them migrate in ancient time. Dravidan does have some similar DNA with European about 20-30 % and has close linguistic relation as well

But the main source of European must be coming from African directly since the distance between 2 continents are not much. In the ancient time I think African continent and Europe is still united.

This is why I said Dravidan is not the source, but they does give additional DNA component to current European people.

All Eurasians (both Europeans and Asians) come from a small group of people who left Africa 60,000 years ago, so Europeans can't be genetically closer to Africans than to other Eurasians.

Besides Dravidian is a language family, not a genetic thing. The native hunter-gatherer ancestry of South Asians is called AASI in the scientific community and it did not contribute to the formation of Europeans.

 

[Indos]

All Eurasians (both Europeans and Asians) come from a small group of people who left Africa 60,000 years ago, so Europeans can't be genetically closer to Africans than to other Eurasians.

Besides Dravidian is a language family, not a genetic thing. The native hunter-gatherer ancestry of South Asians is called AASI in the scientific community and it did not contribute to the formation of Europeans.

Language family is basically learned to see the broader human grouping. No one deny that Dravidan people or Austronesian people for example have common phisycal appearance.

Later human do mixing in later period that I think mostly caused by war in their previous location and some also seek better places for agriculture cultivation, then we can see variation within South Asian people that some define as the result of Aryan Invasion that later could explain discriminative Hindu caste system.

From my nation perspective, both Arab and Chinese migration to Indonesia have been recorded by Ibnu Batutah, ancient Arab traveller. Those Arab and Chinese who still look like their original people are the result of very recent migration during Dutch rule. To see connection between Indonesia and Middle East, it can be seen by the fact that the main component to make dead man as mummy in Ancient Egypt comes from Sumatra, particularly Barus region.

 

[Tom-tom]

Reference Populations – Geno 2.0 Next Generation
Introduction:

Modern-day populations from around the world carry particular blends of regional affiliations. We compared your DNA results to each of 60 geographic and ethnic populations and calculated which two of these populations were most similar to you in terms of the genetic markers you carry.

Here is the report made by National Geographic

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/

Alright, Salam, ramadan mubarak., distantly far removed bhia jaan. Link not working.

 

[Indos]

Alright, Salam, ramadan mubarak., distantly far removed bhia jaan. Link now working.

Walaikum Salam. Ramadhan Mubarak as well for you.

Yup the link is not working anymore. Luckily I have made this thread and some PDF members, including me, have already saved or copy paste the result in this thread.

 

[Maira La]

Language family is basically learned to see the broader human grouping. No one deny that Dravidan people or Austronesian people for example have common phisycal appearance.

Language families don't necessarily correspond to genetics. See the chart below I created just now (better than the national geographic bul*sh*t):

Indonesians speak Austronesian, yet they are genetically closer to original Austroasiatics than to Austronesians.

 

[Indos]

Language families don't necessarily correspond to genetics. See the chart below I created just now (better than the national geographic bul*sh*t):

View attachment 923419

Indonesians speak Austronesian, yet they are genetically closer to original Austroasiatics than to Austronesians.

You are true that Javanese is more Austroasiastic than Austronesian. It is the result or earlier migration from mainland SEA into Indonesia. Most probably happen when Indonesia and mainland SEA is still connected by land.

The later migration of Austronesian from Taiwan through sea is later.

The finding is accurate based on Indonesia Eijkman recent DNA suryei. Eijkman Institute is our gov institution but has been established since Dutch rule.

 

[Indos]

National Geographic see both Austronesian and Austroasiastic as one by saying it as SEA DNA. Both are cousins to each other.

 

[sutton999]

Without look into details, my bet this DNA result is pretty inaccurate.

northern Indian 3% England/Ireland DNA, that is impossible for only small number of British were there for not that long time.

Vietnam I would imagine a lot more than 12% East Asian DNA, by how similar in looks alone.