AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Whose side you are on? I can see now why your compatriots are calling you neo-Razakar on the internet.
You are justifying the murders and atrocities on your own people and making excuses for the people who did that! Just to get acceptance here and to feed the hatreds that you have for India.
Pathetic! Pathetic!
I don't think this is about choosing sides, it is about realizing that the conflict was not a clean 'black and white' one, and that with the emotions dying down, the 'victors history' needs to be reexamined and the truth found, as was suggested in the conference subsequent to the declassification of US documents pertaining to those events, by Bangladeshi and Pakistani officials and researchers.
Atrocities and massacres committed by both sides, there is no question about that, they contributed to the escalation and exacerbation of the situation, and the grey areas and complexities were complicated by Indian supported groups and militants.
Remember that I have often said that the intention for covert support for militant groups in Kashmir was not so innocents woudl be massacred, but some of the groups have gone out of control. It is likely the same happened in East Pakistan with the Indian supported militants.