deckingraj
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
This is my last post on this particular subject since you are not getting it even after repeated attempts
The link that windjammer posted in contrast to Indian claims said "it is unclear if F-104 was given to PAF by Jordan"...which means he could not provide a credible source to refute Indian claims...However the link(neutral) that i posted clearly said that F-104 were given to PAF....Do you see the difference??? I have a source which is neutral and is supporting Indian claims about F-104...You have a source which is neither refuting my claim nor is supporting your claim...Do you see the difference???
Moreover look at Growler post above...even he is saying that you did get F-104...Now if you have respect leave this particular topic in our debate right here...
...They are unclear about the exact numbers of losses...All they know is there were significant losses as admitted by Pak(according to them) and possible reason that f-104 were not used after 71(they were retired)...the link i give is US source who keeps a record of how many f-104 were built and operated by whom and how they performed against russian counterparts and it is not their job to find out exact kills...All they are interested in knowing is how their fighter performed against their then arch rivals...
I did not answer??? Man what is wrong with you?? I started posting in this thread way before you...Since we started on 1971 i wanted to stick to it...How can you conclude anything if you just keep posting from 1965 to 1971 ...what will we achieve??? Keep you 1965 findings with you...and for now concentrate on 1971...Once we are done with 1971 we will talk about 1965...Did i say anything different then the original reply i gave??? So now explain how did i jumped to 1971??? Are you just posting for the sake of it ???
So as our link did that. Our link also refuted Indian propaganda that PAF acquired F-104 from Jordan based on the conflicting Indian versions.
The link that windjammer posted in contrast to Indian claims said "it is unclear if F-104 was given to PAF by Jordan"...which means he could not provide a credible source to refute Indian claims...However the link(neutral) that i posted clearly said that F-104 were given to PAF....Do you see the difference??? I have a source which is neutral and is supporting Indian claims about F-104...You have a source which is neither refuting my claim nor is supporting your claim...Do you see the difference???
Moreover look at Growler post above...even he is saying that you did get F-104...Now if you have respect leave this particular topic in our debate right here...
But you refuted it without any sane reason claiming that it is unclear which it is not. So I am using your own logic to disapprove your link. Since they are uncertain about the kills of F-104 how can they make comments about PAF so called significant losses against IAF of F-104. And because of this contradiction and ambiguity we can say your link is unauthentic and unreliable.
...They are unclear about the exact numbers of losses...All they know is there were significant losses as admitted by Pak(according to them) and possible reason that f-104 were not used after 71(they were retired)...the link i give is US source who keeps a record of how many f-104 were built and operated by whom and how they performed against russian counterparts and it is not their job to find out exact kills...All they are interested in knowing is how their fighter performed against their then arch rivals...
You also didn't answer to 1965 war posts by Pakistani members and jumped to 1971 war.
I did not answer??? Man what is wrong with you?? I started posting in this thread way before you...Since we started on 1971 i wanted to stick to it...How can you conclude anything if you just keep posting from 1965 to 1971 ...what will we achieve??? Keep you 1965 findings with you...and for now concentrate on 1971...Once we are done with 1971 we will talk about 1965...Did i say anything different then the original reply i gave??? So now explain how did i jumped to 1971??? Are you just posting for the sake of it ???