Did Pakistan Army kill three million Bengalis in Bangladesh?

[TMA]

I already said the 3 million figure is disputed. But there is documented evidence on the genocide, whatever the actual number is.

The intention was to exterminate Hindus and their influence from East Pakistan. As I said, the ratio of Hindu population in Bangladesh fell from over 25% to less than 15% after the war. There are also some famous pictures of Pak military checking if the captured men are circumcised or not to determine their religion.

The famine part is also true, it was partly due to the massive looting by Indian Army in Bangladesh after the war.



Again, I've already said 3 million figure is disputed. It was not only Pak army, their local allies like the Razakars were also involved.

Yeah you can tell this narrative to your people...but we do not buy this.

 

[Rusty]

I already said the 3 million figure is disputed. But there is documented evidence on the genocide, whatever the actual number is.

The intention was to exterminate Hindus and their influence from East Pakistan. As I said, the ratio of Hindu population in Bangladesh fell from over 25% to less than 15% after the war. There are also some famous pictures of Pak military checking if the captured men are circumcised or not to determine their religion.

The famine part is also true, it was partly due to the massive looting by Indian Army in Bangladesh after the war.



Again, I've already said 3 million figure is disputed. It was not only Pak army, their local allies like the Razakars were also involved.

Ok so you admit there was no genocide against Bengali Muslims.
Now the second question is, why do bengalis lie when they claim there was a genocide?
If you honestly thought there was one against your Hindu master's, why not say " there was a genocide against Hindu Bengalis"

I hope you get my point, many Pakistanis are really sympathetic to bengalis (myself included)
But when make up nonsense like genocide and 3 million what nots, all you do is make people like me go from sympathetic to anti Bengali.

Again, your famine in 74 actually killed millions of bengalis. But that was due to your own fault and you can't blame us for it.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

True, no Bengali or Indian propagandist has ever been able to bring forward Objective Evidence of the alleged atrocities, and that's why no one takes those made-up figures seriously.

Because it NEVER HAPPENED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!........and they know it. indians and bengalis are genetically hard-wired to be compulsive, extreme liars, which is why you can NEVER believe ANYTHING they say. Especially if they don't have hard, damning evidence to back it up.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

BD’s own investigation during Mujib’s time put the figure of dead at 230K. He suppressed it of course!!! Politicians need some dramatic numbers to play in the arena of politics. By the by, when Bhutto came to Dhaka in 1974 to invite Mujib to an OIC meeting, folks thronged into the streets in such large numbers to greet him that BD paramilitary had to disperse them by force!!!

Interestingly, none of Mijib’s or his chief cohorts’ family members died in 1971. However, they were killed by scores in 1975 by BD folks themselves without any remorse whatsoever!!!

And, Mujib himself killed 40K ex Mukti Bahini Terrorists (MBT) when they defied his “one party one leader under India” rule and resorted to robbery, murders etc.!! Not to mention the one million folks that persished during a man made famine in 1974 due to wide spread corruption, his mismanagement, smuggling of relief goods to India etc..

And, many ex Pak Army officers, who joined MBT, killed one another via coups, betrayals etc. They lived by treachery, and they died by treachery...

the commission formed could only find 57000 dead.
Also those killed by mukti bahini are more than the number of bengalis killed.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Ok so you admit there was no genocide against Bengali Muslims.
Now the second question is, why do bengalis lie when they claim there was a genocide?
If you honestly thought there was one against your Hindu master's, why not say " there was a genocide against Hindu Bengalis"

I hope you get my point, many Pakistanis are really sympathetic to bengalis (myself included)
But when make up nonsense like genocide and 3 million what nots, all you do is make people like me go from sympathetic to anti Bengali.

Again, your famine in 74 actually killed millions of bengalis. But that was due to your own fault and you can't blame us for it.

You forgot to add the other indian/bengali narrative that the 50,000 PA soldiers were raping 10 million bengali women whilst at the same time killing 3 million bengalis. As per indian/bengali logic, the PA defied the laws of Physics in 1971.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Again, I've already said 3 million figure is disputed. It was not only Pak army, their local allies like the Razakars were also involved.

Nice attempt at giving some credibility to those Fabricated and made-up figures with absolutely nothing to back them up, by terming them as simply disputed.

It was Mukti Bahini also that carried out all kinds of atrocities against Biharis and other Non-Bengalis .. Why mention Razakars only?

 

[Rusty]

You forgot to add the other indian/bengali narrative that the 50,000 PA soldiers were raping 10 million bengali women whilst at the same time killing 3 million bengalis. As per indian/bengali logic, the PA defied the laws of Physics in 1971.

It's just part of their myth. They need it to justify their existence and Indian intervention ( as well as their slavery to India)
Obviously non of it is true.

 

[American Pakistani]

3 million could be an exaggerated number but there was a genocide in 1971 there's no question about that. Hindu population in Bangladesh fell from over 25% from pre-1971 to less than 15% after the war.

Because most of them moved to india permanently.

Hummm, out of 25000 troop, 93000 surendered and you people challenge the figure.

Many times we have bust your lies which should've been countered earlier. The troops were 34,000 while rest were police, para, civil administrators, govt servants, families of all those Pakistanis govt employees.

 

[Species]

Ok so you admit there was no genocide against Bengali Muslims.
Now the second question is, why do bengalis lie when they claim there was a genocide?
If you honestly thought there was one against your Hindu master's, why not say " there was a genocide against Hindu Bengalis"

I hope you get my point, many Pakistanis are really sympathetic to bengalis (myself included)
But when make up nonsense like genocide and 3 million what nots, all you do is make people like me go from sympathetic to anti Bengali.

Again, your famine in 74 actually killed millions of bengalis. But that was due to your own fault and you can't blame us for it.

Lol, Hindu masters? Like Pakistanis are under Christian masters?

Anyway, the leaders of the campaign decided to keep it non-communal which is why the religion of the victims are not highlighted. Saying like there was no genocide against Muslims would sound like sympathizing with the perpetrators, a crime is still a crime. But it's mentioned in the studies and investigations if you're interested.

There were severe administrative faults but the famine was largely due to the looting by Indian Army after the war. Dude, the Indians looted $2 billion worth of agricultural products, equipment of mills, when our total GDP was around $6 billion, what do you expect other than a famine?

Nice attempt at giving some credibility to those Fabricated and made-up figures with absolutely nothing to back them up, by terming them as simply disputed.

It was Mukti Bahini also that carried out all kinds of atrocities against Biharis and other Non-Bengalis .. Why mention Razakars only?

Grow up man, disputed is enough to imply what we both are saying. Or should I say it was the greatest lie of humanity or something more cheesy? Anyway, you should move on and let bygone be bygone.

Because most of them moved to india permanently.

Question is why did they move in the first place? Because they were the prime victims.

 

[American Pakistani]

Question is why did they move in the first place? Because they were the prime victims.

Because one or 2 stories were picked by mutkia terrorists and bharat and hyped so much to give birth to a narrative that Pakistan is massacring Hindus. All those left feeling scared.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Grow up man, disputed is enough to imply what we both are saying. Or should I say it was the greatest lie of humanity or something more cheesy? Anyway, you should move on and let bygone be bygone.

You need to wake up and smell the coffee, mate ... If you don't know what Objective Evidence means, use google

 

[Species]

You need to wake up and smell the coffee, mate ... If you don't know what Objective Evidence means, use google

I will make sure to use the term when I write a book on 1971.

 

[Musalman]

Hummm, out of 25000 troop, 93000 surendered and you people challenge the figure.

Yes 93,000 included 25,000 troops, their families including infants, civil services people, West Pakistani civilians. My infant counsin was also made POW by your Indian troops, he also came back in 1974.

 

[Rusty]

Lol, Hindu masters? Like Pakistanis are under Christian masters?

Anyway, the leaders of the campaign decided to keep it non-communal which is why the religion of the victims are not highlighted. Saying like there was no genocide against Muslims would sound like sympathizing with the perpetrators, a crime is still a crime. But it's mentioned in the studies and investigations if you're interested.

There were severe administrative faults but the famine was largely due to the looting by Indian Army after the war. Dude, the Indians looted $2 billion worth of agricultural products, equipment of mills, when our total GDP was around $6 billion, what do you expect other than a famine?



Grow up man, disputed is enough to imply what we both are saying. Or should I say it was the greatest lie of humanity or something more cheesy? Anyway, you should move on and let bygone be bygone.



Question is why did they move in the first place? Because they were the prime victims.

Last I checked Trump is turning red and blue, angry that his super power nation cannot control Pakistan. We are no one's slaves

I am sorry, but your point still makes no sense.
There was a genocide.... but not against the majority Muslims... but it happend.... maybe against the Hindus... but we don't want to mention that they were Hindus.... but it happend.... to somone....

 

[monitor]

I already said the 3 million figure is disputed. But there is documented evidence on the genocide, whatever the actual number is.

The intention was to exterminate Hindus and their influence from East Pakistan. As I said, the ratio of Hindu population in Bangladesh fell from over 25% to less than 15% after the war. There are also some famous pictures of Pak military checking if the captured men are circumcised or not to determine their religion.

The famine part is also true, it was partly due to the massive looting by Indian Army in Bangladesh after the war.



Again, I've already said 3 million figure is disputed. It was not only Pak army, their local allies like the Razakars were also involved.

It's fales .Actually it is Indian soldier checking whither he hide any weapons . This is confirmed by the photographer.
We need truth not propaganda .