Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they want a true Hindu consolidation why will they target him ? he perfectly fits the role of a radical mullah spreading extremism to which all politicians needs to do is to point Hindus towards his BS and the rest will follow.If I am not wrong a "Hindu nationalist" government is in power in Maharashtra and also in Centre, so what is stopping them from banning him/his organisation. Appeasement???
Will that not raise questions about their sincerity in caring for Hindus and their sensibilities since they are in power now and have done nothing about it.If they want a true Hindu consolidation why will they target him ? he perfectly fits the role of a radical mullah spreading extremism to which all politicians needs to do is to point Hindus towards his BS and the rest will follow.
Nope,Most Hindus don't know him ,all it requires is his BS on Tv and Hindus may realize what the problem is.Will that not raise questions about their sincerity in caring for Hindus and their sensibilities?
But what about those who know him and his antics? Won't they consider this to be a failing/backstabbing of/by their trusted party?Nope,Most Hindus don't know him ,all it requires is his BS on Tv and Hindus may realize what the problem is.
This guy is just an orator issue is the crowd.
you don't understand,lets say the govt banned him ....But what about those who know him and his antics? Won't they consider this to be a failing/backstabbing of/by their trusted party?
Banning him means you are effectively invalidating his sermons. And that gives the government the leverage to ban his videos from public space and stop his channel. So is that not what hindus and some muslims want? By not doing so, the Maharashra government is not acting what it preaches...you don't understand,lets say the govt banned him ....
whats next ? will ppl stop following his sermons ? will ppl consider it attack on muslims ? he started this problem but he is no longer alone.
All govt needs to do is let NIA service this joker for few weeks to change his tone.
But that would make you a communalist ****hole.
Really ? govt and SC both can't make AIMPLB to get away with barbaric medieval practices of oral talaq and polygamy and you think the delusional idiots who listen to his sermons and few end up joining ISIS will care what govt is saying and doing ?Banning him means you are effectively invalidating his sermons. And that gives the government the leverage to ban his videos from public space and stop his channel. So is that not what hindus and some muslims want? By not doing so, the Maharashra government is not acting what it preaches...
But they can take steps, can't they? Wasn't Government recently discussing about UCC implementation? So why is there no discussion about banning this man and his sermons while knowing how dangerous this is becoming considering the OP. Either the government can't ban him or doesn't want to ban him...Really ? govt and SC both can't make AIMPLB to get away with barbaric medieval practices of oral talaq and polygamy and you think the delusional idiots who listen to his sermons and few end up joining ISIS will care what govt is saying and doing ?
Your logic is completely flawed.Banning him means you are effectively invalidating his sermons. And that gives the government the leverage to ban his videos from public space and stop his channel. So is that not what hindus and some muslims want? By not doing so, the Maharashra government is not acting what it preaches...
This is shahrukh khans official twitter accountBut they can take steps, can't they? Wasn't Government recently discussing about UCC implementation? So why is there no discussion about banning this man and his sermons while knowing how dangerous this is becoming considering the OP. Either the government can't ban him or doesn't want to ban him...
So if we believe he is dangerous, then why not stop him. You can't stop everything but you will diminish his presence/reach, Won't you? By not banning, you are letting his reach expand/sustain...Your logic is completely flawed.
I hope you know one Anwar Al Awlaki a american preacher who was killed couple of years back and he was also banned by Americans. His sermons even after his death is creating suicide terrorists.
Even this *** hole is banned what will happen except the govt getting dragged another needless controversy and getting another month of defending those actions and getting another name tag as communal... and some would say... didn't i say so....
Please think before you post.
Shahrukh is following him because it's not illegal, make it illegal and see how many follow...This is shahrukh khans official twitter account
His following is an issue which govt can't ban.