Dhaka attackers followed controversial Indian Islamic preacher Zakir Nayek

[laphroaig]

Not one. They are all the same. Virulently, epidemically so.

A virulent epidemic by its very nature is one that propagates and spreads from a point zero case. I do not disagree that all faiths at some time in their history were expansionist. But my point is related to the times we live in.

There are faiths that preach and attempt to spread inorganically. And there are faiths that do not. I see a lot, if not most, of global strife centered around this one aspect in which major faiths of the world differ.

 

[Joe Shearer]

A virulent epidemic by its very nature is one that propagates and spreads from a point zero case. I do not disagree that all faiths at some time in their history were expansionist. But my point is related to the times we live in.

There are faiths that preach and attempt to spread inorganically. And there are faiths that do not. I see a lot, if not most, of global strife centered around this one aspect in which major faiths of the world differ.

Your comment is based on incorrect information. There is no point that I see in engaging with that sort of stand.

 

[laphroaig]

Your comment is based on incorrect information. There is no point that I see in engaging with that sort of stand.

It is an opinion based on experience and attitudes molded by societal influences and interactions.

And based on a plinth of fact.

There are religions that are expansionist today. Who seek to preach and convert. Convert those who were not born into the religion. Therefore inorganic growth by the harvest of souls.

This rubs the religions that do not do the above. And that is where the strife emanates from. Always has, throughout history. That is the basic germ of the war of faiths. Whose faith is right, better. And when there is no faith to fight against, one easily mutates within and it then becomes my way of our faith is the right way.

In essence, I am right, and you are wrong. And if you do not agree, I need to take your head off and move to the next argument.

Hope that explains.

 

[Joe Shearer]

It is an opinion based on experience and attitudes molded by societal influences and interactions.

And based on a plinth of fact.

There are religions that are expansionist today. Who seek to preach and convert. Convert those who were not born into the religion. Therefore inorganic growth by the harvest of souls.

This rubs the religions that do not do the above*. And that is where the strife emanates from. Always has, throughout history. That is the basic germ of the war of faiths. Whose faith is right, better. And when there is no faith to fight against, one easily mutates within and it then becomes my way of our faith is the right way.

In essence, I am right, and you are wrong. And if you do not agree, I need to take your head off and move to the next argument.

Hope that explains.

In essence, you are a communalist ****hole.

PS: And I've taken the head off already, so....

PPS: *With one religion as the exception. Damn you for a barrack-room lawyer.

 

[laphroaig]

In essence, you are a communalist ****hole.

No I am not. But if you have run out of cogent arguments, then I guess it is always easier to resort to baser invective.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

we should be throwing Naik in jail just like Anjem Chaudhry was.

 

[laphroaig]

we should be throwing Naik in jail just like Anjem Chaudhry was.

But that would make you a communalist ****hole.

 

[Joe Shearer]

No I am not. But if you have run out of cogent arguments, then I guess it is always easier to resort to baser invective.

Since you cannot name a single religion that meets your airy criteria, I understand your defining everything else outside your dogma as not cogent. It is pitiful in its inadequacy, but I suppose that is the best that you can do. Now **** off.

we should be throwing Naik in jail just like Anjem Chaudhry was.

Highly overdue. But is Anjem Chaudhry in jail? Wish he was.

 

[laphroaig]

Since you cannot name a single religion that meets your airy criteria, I understand your defining everything else outside your dogma as not cogent. It is pitiful in its inadequacy, but I suppose that is the best that you can do. Now **** off.

Joe

Use some of those drops man.

But not in your ****hole please.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Joe

Use some of those drops man.

Oh no! There's only one, you slob. And stop trapping me, or I'll come down there and tear your balls off. One at a time.

 

[GR!FF!N]

As far as I have known and seen Dr Zakir naik never made this claim.

Actually he did..

 

[Joe Shearer]

But that would make you a communalist ****hole.

Unless, @Guynextdoor2 , you agree to throw in @laphroaig in and make it a package deal.

PS: How about in the same cell?

No I am not. But if you have run out of cogent arguments, then I guess it is always easier to resort to baser invective.

You forgot to mention the sheer bliss of ignoring cogent arguments and using baser and baser invective. It's such a relief.

 

[DesiGuy1403]

Just my 2 cents.

religious bigots are as dangerous as anti-religious bigots.

The only ones who gets to claim any moral high ground are the ones who are completely open to debate and discourse of their beliefs.

Rest can pour what ever drops in what ever holes of their anatomy.

 

[The_Showstopper]

He is not banned due to our Internal politics..Nothing because of Pakistan or BD....In India, everything related to Muslim brothers are unfortunately seen in the vote bank politics...That is why the development of minorities are curtailed to good extent...If any one ban Naik, Muslims will not vote for that party...Now why the political party will take the risk and loose the lucrative Muslim vote?

If I am not wrong a "Hindu nationalist" government is in power in Maharashtra and also in Centre, so what is stopping them from banning him/his organisation. Appeasement???

 

[DesiGuy1403]

If I am not wrong a "Hindu nationalist" government is in power in Maharashtra and also in Centre, so what is stopping them from banning him/his organisation. Appeasement???

Why stop anyone from self-destruction?
It's your youth that is traveling to Syria and dying there.

So, instead of being boastful, bit of introspection might be the order of the day.