Sashan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 1
Which just shows your bias and that you can't look at this case without your preference for the US. That's sad, but doesn't make here guilty, nor justifies the wrong doing of the US authorities. If she has done something wrong and there are proves for it, she should be charged for it, but until that is proven, you can't claim things about her, only because of her origin or because you feel that you are something better than her. So lets wait if the authorities can come up with something real, but the fact that they had no chance to get a grip on her and just shows the weakness of this case and the strenght of GoI.
says more than enough to prove my point!
It does not prove anything. I have clearly mentioned it is my personal view and it does not mean my preference for US. It is about the hard earned reputation of Indian Americans vs the reputation of a crook which can represent a country i.e India. There was an opportunity for her to face the trial. Instead she took the immunity route, a hard bargained one as well almost disrupting the relationships of two countries which was due to efforts of many and not just these IFS officials.
On the contrary, isn't your bias on the show(or some false sense of patriotism) here when you talk about the weakness of the case and strength of GOI? One look at the case details and one would understand there is a clear prima facie evidence. Else there would have been no need for the entire diplomatic machinery to save her a**. A battery of lawyers would be sufficient.
As for me feeling I am something better than her, I am ofcourse. I abide by the law here compared to her and that I am proud of. Don't you think so? or you feel she is better off than me(and you) as she is some neta or babu or something
Last edited: