What's new

Deployment of THAAD: News & Discussions

US threatening China in the SCS is a blessing in disguise for China.

China usually needs a crisis for it to take action. If the 1996 Taiwan crisis didn't happen, China would not have the military power it does now.

China has been incredibly reserved in its military modernisation so far. Hopefully the US threatening China will allow the perfect excuse for the CPC to get rid of all the liberal tree hugging hippies and get pro-military hardliners in there which will result in more spending on the military and military policy changes.

I hope the US continues to threaten China militarily, gives China the perfect justification for its military buildup.

The biggest obstacle for even faster military development is liberal CPC members that think military development is not important.

The phrase “shoot oneself in the foot” springs to mind。

Judging by their past records,the Yankees are obviously extremely good at “it”。:enjoy:
 
. .
US threatening China in the SCS is a blessing in disguise for China.

China usually needs a crisis for it to take action. If the 1996 Taiwan crisis didn't happen, China would not have the military power it does now.

China has been incredibly reserved in its military modernisation so far. Hopefully the US threatening China will allow the perfect excuse for the CPC to get rid of all the liberal tree hugging hippies and get pro-military hardliners in there which will result in more spending on the military and military policy changes.

I hope the US continues to threaten China militarily, gives China the perfect justification for its military buildup.

The biggest obstacle for even faster military development is liberal CPC members that think military development is not important.

Yep, initially it was Deng who made a big mistake by listening to the liberals to scrap our Y-10 commercial airliner.

The liberals hate Mao, so they wanna destroy everything that Mao has left to China.

The Y-10 was also Mao's legacy, and if it wasn't scrapped, China would have already built something equivalent to the Boeing 747, so we wouldn't be waiting for so long.
 
Last edited:
.
A3208/15 - THE SEGMENT MEPEP-LUVAR OF ATS RTE Y2 CLSD. 31 OCT 23:50 2015 UNTIL 01 NOV 01:00 2015. CREATED: 30 OCT 09:35 2015

A3217/15 - THE FLW SEGMENTS OF ATS RTE CLSD: 1. Y2: MEPEP-LUVAR. 2. L888: MUMAN-SANLI. 31 OCT 23:40 2015 UNTIL 01 NOV 01:00 2015. CREATED: 31 OCT 14:16 2015

6631405315770192965.jpg


6631415211374824447.png
 
. .
Tell Japan to not be naughty with the nukes.
HQ-19 is a Anti-Balistic Missile Interceptor, a defensive weapon. Many countries around you have such system in place: Russia, India, Pakistan, South Korea, Japan and ...Vietnam.

pretty much depending on China military posture (and America´s response by and large), decides Japan will acquire nuclear weapon or not. and not that you deploy a defensive system.
 
.
HQ-19 is a Anti-Balistic Missile Interceptor, a defensive weapon. Many countries around you have such system in place: Russia, India, Pakistan, South Korea, Japan and ...Vietnam.

pretty much depending on China military posture (and America´s response by and large), decides Japan will acquire nuclear weapon or not. and not that you deploy a defensive system.

I think you have confused the SAM with the BM interceptor.

missiledefence.png
 
Last edited:
. .
Ya ya warning to india
Japan
Australia
Vietnam
Taiwan
Somalia
Cuba
Ethopia
Africa
And many more..

Omg master china is the best.:china::omghaha::flame:

It will be another 30 years before you lot come up with a ballistic missile interceptor as lethal as the HQ-19。:D:lol:

Then there are HQ-26 and HQ-29 for you guys to covet。:argh:
 
. .
Chinese talks very loud but when US came near to they artificial islands, they did nothing, Why did not use your ships to escort US off the islands? Building weapons is meaningless if you dare not use them. US still has plan to patrol near the islands at least twice every three months.
If Chinese dared to do something to push US away from those fakes island. All the countries in South East Asia will have to reconsider cooperation with US.
 
. .
HQ-19 = THAAD-ER(still in planning stage or development?)

HQ-19 or SC-19(two different beasts)?That's the question。:D

GMD uses DN-1 or DN-2

It's funny how these systems have been in testing for over a decade and have yet to enter service.
 
.
Chinese talks very loud but when US came near to they artificial islands, they did nothing,

Speeding up our constructions and militarizing them is us doing something. Just be patient and watch the show.
Our responses will be matched by the pace of our construction and militarization. The situation will be very different in a few year's time.

Building weapons is meaningless if you dare not use them.

If having weapons is meaningless, then your country would have stopped buying them and pay for your rice instead, Us not using them is more to do with responsibility. Similar applies to our nuclear capabilities. Don't mistake us for not using them for us being afraid to use them. It is simply we do not need to, this does not mean we won't. It all depends on the circumstances.
 
Last edited:
.
your reply futher prove that your dubmness is only limited by those bullshits you put into the post. The more you type, the more stupidity you reveal yourself.

This is a weapon system far far beyond your comprehension Go back to do what you do best: keep posting your world war 2 junk equipments on vietnam's military thread.
Ha ha ha it is you fool that posts dumb comments on VN army thread. I post what I like, and especially for you I am thinking to post world war 1 toys being in service in the VN army.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom