Democracy never flourished in Pakistan because rulers were hand-picked in past: PM

[Verve]

And how disingenuous of you to ignore what happened after the PM was removed.

A new PM and then Elections on time, what else did you expect Dumbo!?

 

[VCheng]

A new PM and then Elections on time, what else did you expect Dumbo!?

And the bloody civilians kept in their place, which is the point of such periodic exercises of illegality.

 

[Verve]

And the bloody civilians kept in their place, which is the point of such periodic exercises of illegality.

Each government completed its tenure, don't get your knickers in a twist. Go have a stiff drink or something.

 

[VCheng]

Each government completed its tenure, don't get your knickers in a twist. Go have a stiff drink or something.

Of course. There was no illegal meddling in politics in any of these situations. Of course.

 

[Verve]

Of course. There was no illegal meddling in politics in any of these situations. Of course.

Nothing illegal at all. One didn't do as ordered by SC do he got disqualified and other didn't declare his receivables in his assets.

Many MNA and MPA have been disqualified for similar actions. And a legal lesson for you, a PM is an MNA first and foremost.

 

[VCheng]

Nothing illegal at all. One didn't do as ordered by SC do he got disqualified and other didn't declare his receivables in his assets.

Many MNA and MPA have been disqualified for similar actions. And a legal lesson for you, a PM is an MNA first and foremost.

Of course. Of course.

And yet the reality of the country and its institutions is clearly evident in what it is, isn't it? But at least for now, the "alignment of institutions" has been created, so it will be a great step forward to deliver what has been promised, right? The "hand-picking" that PMIK mentioned was only in the past, and not now. Of course!

We shall soon be able to see the results here, too.

 

[Verve]

Of course. Of course.

And yet the reality of the country and its institutions is clearly evident in what it is, isn't it? But at least for now, the "alignment of institutions" has been created, so it will be a great step forward to deliver what has been promised, right? The "hand-picking" that PMIK mentioned was only in the past, and not now. Of course!

We shall soon be able to see the results here, too.

Get drunk and wait for the results.

 

[VCheng]

Get drunk and wait for the results.

Actual results are always preferable to promises made. What's the rush?

 

[Verve]

Actual results are always preferable to promises made. What's the rush?

Zardari was smart. Nawaz was stupid.

Nothing illegal about any of it. Stupid get caught and disqualified.

 

[VCheng]

Zardari was smart. Nawaz was stupid.

Nothing illegal about any of it. Stupid get caught and disqualified.

Zardari did become the first to complete his term, an achievement of sorts, I suppose. Whom the hand blesses or not is a mystery sometimes. Who are we to question such patriotic wisdom?

 

[Nilgiri]

You don't tell us what to do or think. We do.. Pakistan like Israel is a nuclear state surrounded by terrorist nations.

Pakistan first!

Dan Coats just agreed with you

 

[Imad.Khan]

As if his election was any different

says a Bengali

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...ocracy-bnp-chief-alamgir-181231183622220.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...rested-over-election-irregularities-reporting
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/01/opinions/bangladesh-election-oped-intl/index.html

IK is very likely the most popular political personality in Pakistan, I can't deny that.

BUT to become PM, he was hand picked and had a helping hand - the same thing he seems to be criticising.

You are contradicting yourself, why would he need to be hand-picked or given a helping hand if he is the most popular political personality in Pakistan.

 

[beijingwalker]

Democracy never flourished in China either, so what's a big deal

 

[Imad.Khan]

Nope. The hidden hand also made sure that electives (at MPA and MNA level) just fell into PTIs laps and that the system be hijacked to ensure that the vote count favours their ladla's party.

IK may have been the most popular political figure, but he wouldn't have won as many seats as he did without the not-so-hidden help.

Unlike the 2013 elections where we have video evidence of people actually stuffing ballot boxes and i am sure you must have read the findings of the judicial commission. No such thing happened this time, even then i am sure you would claim that 2013 elections were fair but this one wasn't.

Of course. Just as the Supreme Court suddenly delivered swift justice to remove the previous PM, by the force of law. Of course.

Suddenly and swift?

Panama Leaks occurred on 9th May 2016. Nawaz is ousted April 13th 2017 and only gets sentenced in July 2018 on just one case and the trials are still ongoing on others. How is this suddenly and swift? If it was someone like you or me we would have been rotting in jail as soon as the leaks came out.

Oh yeah, just compare that to Asghar Khan's case and so on. The SC delivered results just in time in accordance with its assigned task. How opportune. Of course.

So just to please you, the decision should have been delayed just like the Asghar Khan case.

Here is a question for you, do you want the corrupts to be punished or not?

Of course. There was no illegal meddling in politics in any of these situations. Of course.

So punishing a corrupt is illegal now? Salute to your logic

 

[maithil]

Oh the irony !