Debunking Indian claims of F-16 firing AIM-120C AMRAAM

[mastaan]

How do you explain the discrepancy in the contract number being shown as a sale to countries other than Pakistan?

Sir, we have enough airmen to help us with that. I am a layman.. All i know is that uniformed men would know their stuff and am trying to understand as well.

There are three inconsistencies and they need to be understood as i see it
1. 2 vs 1 plan down of IAF
2. 2 pilots as confirmed by DG ISPR and Pakistan PM vs only 1 being returned
3. This AMRAM claim by IAF and who is right between the two parties and how could one find that

 

[Maxpane]

I already congratulated 9 Sqn in the morning.



This piece should remind them that we have 600+ of these for them

sir was f 16 involved in that mission?

 

[Rank]

Shortest Summary

 

[Emmie]

Is there a clearer picture of the contract number on that missile, because @DESERT FIGHTER post shows that contract number being for an AIM 120C contract for Taiwan.

 

[Maarkhoor]

I already congratulated 9 Sqn in the morning.



This piece should remind them that we have 600+ of these for them

What is the problem if we have sent F-16? Kiya India ko unki marzi ka jet se hi bomb kerwana hai lolssss

 

[Agha Sher]

This AIM-120C debris on Indian side so are they confirming another hit? Was it PAF or not, will decide later. However, let them unload whatever they have and there is reply for everything and we must thank them to clear this out. Again, was there another hit on Indian side as well? because one felt inside Pakistan.

Hoping for another kill. however, an exploded AIM-120 does not exactly means a kill, isn't their a self-termination mechanism if the target is missed?

Also, it seems like the missile was sold to Taiwan, how on earth is it with PAF? (They might have fabricated the evidence)

 

[Bilal Khan 777]

sir was f 16 involved in that mission?

F16s will always be used to defend Pakistani skies when Indian aircraft try to cross the LOC.

 

[ice_man]

A) PAKISTAN didnt use F-16.
B) Pakistan suffered no loss.
C) i know you people have no shame, but can you give any proof of your claim?
C) AIM120C5 drama again exposed;
View attachment 542962

View attachment 542964


View attachment 542961

thank you for clarifying i hope the indians watch this but they are a crazy nation just build their own hysteria and believe it .

 

[Great Janjua]

I already congratulated 9 Sqn in the morning.



This piece should remind them that we have 600+ of these for them

I think ISPR should come forward and debunk these useless souls

 

[Bilal Khan 777]

What is the problem if we have sent F-16? Kiya India ko unki marzi ka jet se hi bomb kerwana hai lolssss

Because they dont want their pilots to wear pampers when they get inside the cockpit.

 

[Maarkhoor]

Indians are showing this picture

and referencing this contract:

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/66635/pentagon-announces-“forgotten”-contracts-(feb-14).html


But notice the additional P00016 at the end. There is a separate contract:

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/ar...raytheon-wins-$200m-for-amraam-(dec.-23).html


This contract is noted as 'a separate contract' and the receiving parties are USAF, USN, USA, and foreign military sales to Canada and Poland.

Another Indian lie debunked.

Don't waste you efforts on indiots....it is just like that...

Ami Ami mujhe ladkey ne mara hai...

Ami: tu b maar ja kar...

Nahiem ami woh bada ladka hai....

 

[Maxpane]

F16s will always be used to defend Pakistani skies when Indian aircraft try to cross the LOC.

sir did we get any damage as indian media claim? cuz its very disturbing

 

[Arsalan 345]

it looks taiwanese missile.even if it's pakistani,congratulations for a successful missile strike on iaf jet.india should shame that it's showing aim-120c as proof.where is the radar signature that iaf is talking about? they are making fun of iaf.

 

[Izooka Bazooka]

Indian media is claiming to have found remains of an AIM-120 C5 with Serial Nr: CC12497 & Contract Nr: FA8675-05-C-0070

That lot and contract was for Taiwan. This is noted in official report here: https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpic/cp...ry%20Sales.pdf

 

[valkyr_96]

Indians are showing this picture

and referencing this contract:

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/66635/pentagon-announces-“forgotten”-contracts-(feb-14).html


But notice the additional P00016 at the end. There is a separate contract:

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/ar...raytheon-wins-$200m-for-amraam-(dec.-23).html


This contract is noted as 'a separate contract' and the receiving parties are USAF, USN, USA, and foreign military sales to Canada and Poland.

Another Indian lie debunked.

Please reach out to natsecjeff on twitter