Taygibay
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 3,392
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
My brother kindly go through my previous post. You are far from reality. Calm down and come down to earth and spell the reality
Spell, LOL, delicious! But the rest is not as great.
PariK reports what he has access to and you oppose, fine!
With incessant calls for a logic that you yourself don't apply.
and that is the disturbing part.
36+18 is the deal we are signing. Don't know from where PARIKRAMA getting these source which even French ministry could deny. It's true India need more fighters like rafale for various reasons but how far we can spend is the real question. PARIKRAMA says we will buy atleast 200 rafale. But India already investing in 150+ FGFA, 150+ AMCA, 200+ Tejas MK2. I mean seriously we have sufficient funds? I doubt it. By far IN will go for another 40+ rafale for its INS Vishal which will enter service by 2030. That too if Americans have no problem with India not buying carrier jets from them as many inputs are made available from US carrier programs. If India gets new Vikrant 2 rafale should be modified for ski jump rather mig29 or mi35 cuts the cue. If IN buy super carrier proposed by Russians then don't make any mistakes it could be aimed with N FGFA and AMCA and Tejas MK2.
So these stupid so called source are really misleading and pathetic with these kind of claims. U dint even mentioned about another single engine fighter under make in India. At most IAF will operate around 36 (by2022) 18 more as follow on by 2025. By this time India will have very matured fleet of fifth generation FGFA, handsomely upgraded Super Su, AMCA with promising results.
I will also claim that this is what my so. Called source based news says. Because it's far far away from timeline and reality
I really wish we have 200 rafale along with 300 sukoi by 2030. If this happened them it's good. But it's not the plan in first place as claimed by many here. Wishing is one thing Saying it as source is another thing as it misleading
What would Le Drian deny or have to deny? Contrarily to other DMs,
he never says too much in the first place. And if you mean about an
MII line or even just a simple second order, the person who clearly
said it was coming is not our MinDef but Éric Trappier himself in his
Results 2015 conference Q&A.
The numbers bandied around vary in credibility but Dassault's CEO's
sense of humour is way finer than inventing orders so that we know
that a different deal is under negotiations.
Well, insulting twice removed people you never met is a low PK exercise.
You may only be attacking the constrained interpretation of their message.
Plus, the following comparison with FGFA concerns an undeveloped plane.
And maybe others don't mention the foreign single engine line because it is
not coming.
You alone are responsible for believing what you read on fora, my man!
Besides, PariK is not the worst offender in that domain.
Heed to your own advice from top and calm down.
I hope life provides a nice setting for you to do so, Tay.
P.S.
Random R, you again answered what you thought I said, mate!
No system for another plane whichever can be called SPECTRA.
Find out why and you'll get the meaning of my post you quoted.
And great day, Tay.