COAS was asked by the Govt to play facilitative role for resolution of current impasse, ISPR

[he-man]

He has no SOFT CORNER for Taliban. Its a blatant lie made by US buffoons. Taliban are extremists bent on enforcing their enforcing their jihadist version of Islam on everyone, everywhere with any means possible. IK is no such thing. He is a democrat and follower of Jinnah envisioned Pakistan, not the mullahcracy envisioned by Taliban. Its time you Indians and other non-Pakistanis understand this fact.

Problem is i am not a fool to believe ur views.............i very well know for a fact that taliban khan was against any military action on ttp.

If u don't then u simply are living in a fool's paradise.

 

[Norwegian]

Presidency is a ceremonial office in a parliamentary form of the government. The constitution of Pakistan even in its original form never gave powers to the President, chief executive of the country has been always prime minister. 18th amendment actually transfered powers back to prime minister, powers which Musharraf as a president transferred to himself through LFO in 2002. Restriction on more than two terms was also introduced by Musharraf, this was done specifically to curtail BB and NS - constitution otherwise never had this restriction.

Thanks for the clarification, but these changes poses huge risks to the stability of the politics at national level. We know all about massive corruption during Benazir terms and Sharif terms in the past. Their democratic governments were forcibly ousted by the powers of the President and Army on charges of corruption and abuse of political power. Yet they are back again in business by reversing the amendments? What do we as a nation do now? If this system continue to exist in present form, we would never get rid of these elitist seasoned politicians.

 

[Emmie]

@he-man keep it to the topic on hand. Thanks

 

[SBD-3]

https://twitter.com/x/status/505084424833085440

 

[Norwegian]

i very well know for a fact that taliban khan was against any military action on ttp

Again you are misinformed. TTP wanted IK to lead the delegation from Pak government to negotiate with them. IK refused outright. Soft corner? In his interviews, he only wanted to negotiate so that out of 50+ Taliban groups, those who wish to live in peace can be separated from the violent and extreme one's. Those left could then be taken out by PakArmy. This has always been his stance.

 

[he-man]

@he-man keep it to the topic on hand. Thanks

What off topic stuff did i post??
Please tell me.

I have been banned from 2 threads today.
Can u tell me why is that?

Again you are misinformed. TTP wanted IK to lead the delegation from Pak government to negotiate with them. IK refused outright. Soft corner? In his interviews, he only wanted to negotiate so that out of 50+ Taliban groups, those who wish to live in peace can be separated from the violent and extreme one's. Those left could then be taken out by PakArmy. This has always been his stance.

Imran khan is not a progressive leader.
Nawaz may be corrupt but will be better for pakistan in long run than imran khan.

Plus after this rally is over his political future looks doubtful

 

[SBD-3]

What off topic stuff did i post??
Please tell me.

Bashing Imran Khan

 

[Emmie]

Thanks for the clarification, but these changes poses huge risks to the stability of the politics at national level. We know all about massive corruption during Benazir terms and Sharif terms in the past. Their democratic governments were forcibly ousted by the powers of the President and Army on charges of corruption and abuse of political power. Yet they are back again in business by reversing the amendments? What do we as a nation do now? If this system continue to exist in present form, we would never get rid of these elitist seasoned politicians.

Well, you won't agree but those amendments were necessary, executive power has to vest where it should be in parliamentary form of the government.

Could you please specify what exactly you want to discuss? Change in a system or rectification of a system?

What off topic stuff did i post??
Please tell me.

I have been banned from 2 threads today.
Can u tell me why is that?



Imran khan is not a progressive leader.
Nawaz may be corrupt but will be better for pakistan in long run than imran khan.

Plus after this rally is over his political future looks doubtful

Fancy words like Taliban khan and bla bla is totally uncalled for. This might derail the thread.

 

[he-man]

Well, you won't agree but those amendments were necessary, executive power has to vest where it should be in parliamentary form of the government.

Could you please specify what exactly you want to discuss? Change in a system or rectification of a system?



Fancy words like Taliban khan and bla bla is totally uncalled for. This might derail the thread.

As anyone can see i am not derailing this thread a bit

 

[Emmie]

As anyone can see i am not derailing this thread a bit

What your Taliban khan story got to do with the press release issued by ISPR?

 

[Norwegian]

Could you please specify what exactly you want to discuss? Change in a system or rectification of a system?

Both. Since most if not all of our parliamentarians are seasoned politicians from the status quo class who paid millions of RS to get these seats, I really have no idea who we can get rid of these and replace with true representatives from all classes of Pakistani society. If all executive authority of the nation has to be in the hands of national assembly, then we are gonna have to see poor, working class people there. Not rich, elite people from upper middle class and known industrialists.

Imran khan is not a progressive leader.

LOL. He is at least a leader, unlike seasoned politician Nawaz.

 

[VCheng]

I agree however I believe in checks and balances to be in constitution. Removing Presidential powers in my opinion was a big mistake and should be brought back, or Presidential system like Iran's be introduced where candidates are vetted and few selected by a supreme council for public to vote on and ministers are technocrats instead of damned politicians.

A system of checks and balances works the best, I agree with you. But any changes must be done in the proper manner so that they remain constitutionally valid. It is up to the nation to decide what works best for it.

 

[Zarvan]

He is trying to be neutral here. So he is refuting no body..

Mr ISPR has released the statement on COAS behalf and they have clearly said it was government who asked Army to mediate

 

[Zarvan]

What off topic stuff did i post??
Please tell me.

I have been banned from 2 threads today.
Can u tell me why is that?



Imran khan is not a progressive leader.
Nawaz may be corrupt but will be better for pakistan in long run than imran khan.

Plus after this rally is over his political future looks doubtful

Your thoughts had made it clear that why crime are on the rise in India

 

[Asian.Century]

“The army’s role (as mediator) is continuing and it will certainly guarantee the implementation of any agreement that the protesting parties reach with the government,” but NS and his company of badshah has to go, and announce ELECTION END OF 2015.