Jango
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,530
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country
- Location
`For example most of the terrorists were or are nabbed by tracing their cell phones or by tapping their telephone. So when this crucial evidence is presented in Court, Court has no choice but to reject it because, In criminal panel code, there is not even a single law which cover scientific evidence as part of trial. So all scientific evidences are discarded and all terrorist walks free.
Now whose fault is it? To plug such gaps in law making? When Parliament can pass 18,19,20 amendment then why can not saviors of democracy can plug such piety gaps in constitution?
That's why most terrorists in Sawat and tribal areas will be persecuted in Army courts, Under Army law which cover such loopholes.
There was a retired judge on TV saying the exact thing, that the law should be changed to accommodate electronic evidence, because the world is quickly changing and most stuff is done on gadgets now.